-
[quote]A fan asked why some characters, like Storm and Wolverine, get the spotlight over others, like Rogue and Gambit. "It's all about who's writing the books," said Alonso. "[B]There's a lot of love for Rogue [/B]and she's in a team book ['Uncanny Avengers'] and there's been a lot of love for Jubilee. She's popped up recently... The great thing about all them is that they could all anchor a solo series, like Cullen's 'Magneto.' Meet the writer who gets the character and we'll do it."[/quote]
So the current writers are the reason Marvel is not having Rogue anchor a title??!!!! :mad::(
-
No one would have been there for an Inhumans only panel. Marvel knows this. It's obviously why they're putting the two together. Because, despite their best attempts, the Inhumans just aren't catching on like they want. So now they've figured that they should just tie them together somehow with this upcoming storyline, and then people will have to care. The X-fans at least. :mad:
-
Why does Marvel hate Crystal so much?
-
[QUOTE=Jackraow21;1340531]No one would have been there for an Inhumans only panel. Marvel knows this. It's obviously why they're putting the two together. Because, despite their best attempts, the Inhumans just aren't catching on like they want. So now they've figured that they should just tie them together somehow with this upcoming storyline, and then people will have to care. The X-fans at least. :mad:[/QUOTE]
I'm sure that outside of Kamala and Lockjaw (both of whom conveniently share one book), people still won't care about any of the Inhumans.
-
they can keep trying. you can't force people to like something they aren't interested in. it's just embarrassing.
worse is soule parading beast out like anyone would miss him. heads up! you can keep him.
-
[QUOTE=Hi-Fi;1340537]Why does Marvel hate Crystal so much?[/QUOTE]
How many books do you want her to have?
-
The Inhumans have their fans and deservedly so. They're great characters who can stand on their own with the right creative team... and Soule and McNiven are definitely the right creative team. The Inhumans don't need to be intertwined with the X-Men. Marvel simply wants the Inhumans to blow up almost instantly like Ms. Marvel or Spider-Gwen have.
-
[QUOTE=FlawedCoil82;1340386]So not one person at the panel could ask what the definitive fate of "X-Men '92" would be? Lame. :([/QUOTE]
What that it is a 4 issue mini? He already know that. I don't think it'll become ongoing
-
[QUOTE=Dog;1340541]How many books do you want her to have?[/QUOTE]
One, maybe. She hasn't had a relevant appearance in years.
-
[QUOTE=nx01a;1340352]
Marvel have cannibalized the FF and the X-Men to continue their corporate-mandated Inhumans push, from using the previously X-related 'Uncanny' moniker to dragging Cyclops and Beast and Johnny Storm into the Inhumans fold. Now the fate of mutants and Inhumans has been intertwined. If the Inhumans are so great, why do they need to be tied to the X-franchise going forward? I think Black Bolt et al are awesome but making the X-franchise almost entirely about responding to the terrigen mists and mutant/Inhuman relations? No. Just no. Let the Inhumans sink or swim on the strength of the characters and the writer and artist, not the strength of whatever other Fox movie franchises Marvel can throw into the mix.[/QUOTE]
This.
I imagine the kind of people that at this point STILL don't believe that Marvel isn't trying to lesser the role of the FOX franchises and use to promote the Inhumans probably still believe that Saddam had WMDs somewhere. Or that Bill Cosby is a nice guy. Or that they are shocked that there is corruption at FIFA.
You have to be very gullible to not see anything wrong just because middle management of one of the largest corporations of the world tell you there's nothing wrong.
[QUOTE=Knight of DC;1340364]Because it's hard to accept that zeitgist has been moving away from the X-Men for quite some time. Yeah, it's not just the movie rights. Be honest and take a look at sales of the X-Books over the last couple of years, outside of UXM and ANXM, they weren't exactly high sellers. Even alleged cash cow Wolverine wasn't a big seller in the lead up to his death.
[/QUOTE]
Except for the small fact that they STILL outsold Avengers titles. Wolverine and Deadpool sold more than Iron Man or Captain America for example.
-
[QUOTE=FlashingSabre;1340573]One, maybe. She hasn't had a relevant appearance in years.[/QUOTE]
She'll be showing up in the unannounced All-New Inhumans, according to the podcast from the other day.
-
[QUOTE=protege;1340405]It doesn't sound like there are going to be any Xmen/inhuman clashes[/QUOTE]
I suspect its a tricky position. They want to use X-men to prop up Inhumans. Make X-men look bad in whatever fashion, fans revolt, Marvel are the bad guys. Make Inhumans look bad and no one cares about them, the property doesn't grow. Thus rather than just telling a story as you would expect, due to ulterior motives and unique circumstances they have to tapdance around it so everyone looks wonderful.
-
[QUOTE=berserkerclaw;1340570]What that it is a 4 issue mini? He already know that. I don't think it'll become ongoing[/QUOTE]
There is conflicting information tho. There are just as many websites claiming that "X-Men '92" is an on-going series as there are claiming it is just a mini-series. I want to know how much longer Marvel will get to have me as a paying customer.
-
"When "All-New, All-Different Marvel" arrives this October, the fates of the Inhumans and the X-Men will be intertwined more than ever before.". Since when have they ever been?
-
[QUOTE=Bl00dwerK;1340614]"When "All-New, All-Different Marvel" arrives this October, the fates of the Inhumans and the X-Men will be intertwined more than ever before.". Since when have they ever been?[/QUOTE]
Pietro and Crystal marriage...
Luna...
Son of M...
And maybe the Illuminati stuff.
