What is your verdict on Gerry Conway's Amazing Spider-Man run?
[URL="http://community.comicbookresources.com/showthread.php?15924-What-is-your-verdict-on-Roberto-Aguirre-Sacasa-s-Sensational-Spider-Man"]Recently, I've done a few threads asking about relatively recent Spider-Man runs.[/URL]
But let's look at a classic run, the tail end of the first 150 issues of [I]Amazing Spider-Man[/I].
I'm curious about what the consensus on it is.
To explain the potential scores, as it's possible for one man's B to be another man's C...
An A+ is the highest score. It's meant to be pretty rare, an indication that this run is up there with the best of the medium (Frank Miller's Daredevil, Byrne/ Claremont X-Men, Neil Gaiman's Sandman, etc.)
An A is impressive, but not quite on that level. It would be among the best for the character.
A B indicates that the run is good but not great. The majority of the material is still worth rereading. In terms of quality, it's largely a success.
A C is pedestrian. It's neither good nor bad, and most of the material is probably not worth rereading.
A D is poor. It's a flat out failure. Most of the material isn't worth reading in the first place.
An F is worse.
It's also possible that some of the people here might not have an interest in Silver/ Bronze age comics, so there is an option for those who probably aren't going to read any of it.