[QUOTE=MaximoffTrash;5910105]So does Lore introduced the mutants then?
Anyway I don't want them in MoM, and if there is a Lore-Wanda as the villain, she should serve main Wanda and Stephen's narrative.[/QUOTE]
The same mutant rumor has been moved around since Endgame. If it doesn't happen in Strange 2, the rumor will then move to Thor, lol.
[QUOTE=The Agent of Chaos;5909983]Interesting leak for Multiverse of Madness.
[spoil]It is rumored that Patrick Stewart’s Professor X has a significant role in Multiverse of Madness. His role apparently parallels the character’s role at the start of House of M where he tries to help Wanda and apparently “dies”. The movie ends with Wanda creating a universe/multiverse-wide hex. The leaker wasn’t exactly sure what happened.
Now there has been post-reshoot leaks that clarifies the ending. Apparently they go fill House of M and create new reality with mutants have been a part of MCU history and Deadpool is the only one that remembers the previous X-Men universe (similar to Wolverine in House of M).[/spoil][/QUOTE]
I really don’t want to care at all about leaks cause so many just be the title’s of them have been so over the top it makes the WandaVision ones look humble, but I have to just post about this one cause it is leaks that are going around like these that are so contrary to the reality of the story the MCU and Fiege is planned out so far for Wanda.
WandaVision already revealed by Fiege himself about No Strange at the end of the last episode cause the whole wanted to avoid the Mansplaning problem. This one would totally undercut all of that completely and that is why I find it just more Clickbait sensationalings to get clicks and likes by the leakers.
The leaks are IMO by just their titles become so over the top that if was a Major Doctor Strange fan I be ticked off if this was really HIS movie anymore or not, lol! :p
The mutant rumors are exhausting i mean they can use variants or whatever like they tried with the ralph nod to fox in WV but not even the fantastic four are casted and we know they're coming, i think we gonna get mutants in at least 4 or 5 years from now.
Not more stupid evil Wanda/Reverse Hom "leaks". Can we just stop listening and posting so called leaks and spoilers, this it;s the same old crap over and over again.
[QUOTE=ARkadelphia;5909802]What if… Mr Kurt Busiek is slated to write a Wanda solo and is hanging around this thread to get a deeper education on the character’s recent escapades and test the waters on different ideas about continuity?[/QUOTE]
I'm not. Sorry to disappoint.
kdb
[QUOTE=leokearon;5910294]Not more stupid evil Wanda/Reverse Hom "leaks". Can we just stop listening and posting so called leaks and spoilers, this it;s the same old crap over and over again.[/QUOTE]
I've heard from a friend who works at Njntendo but also knows Kevin Feige's hairdresser, that Xavier, Optimus Prime, Cloud Strife, Danger Mouse, and Rocky & Bullwinkle all try to stop Wanda, while Doctor Strange sits in a corner and cries, "thus was supposed to be my movie", he sobs, as Tifa Lockhart, Space Harrier, Batman, Catwoman, Top Cat, Officer Dibble, Bart Simpsion, and Doctor Who arrive.
Wanda says that she tried to understand her powers but that was all totally pointless, so she just decides to let it all Hex out and do the thing she did at the beginning of WandaVision. "So this is character development?" She asks, confused.
[QUOTE=Kurt Busiek;5910583]I'm not. Sorry to disappoint.
kdb[/QUOTE]
I KNEW I should have put this in the regular What if?… thread rather than here. :)
[QUOTE=Cruelrain;5910092]I do feel the same but would the writers use as inspiration a very obscure character from wanda's first solo comic? Especially if she isn't the lead but a co-lead apparently[/QUOTE]
It certainly has been done before. For example: Logan used the character [URL="https://comicvine.gamespot.com/albert/4005-15689/"]Albert[/URL] as the inspiration for [I]X-24[/I].
[QUOTE=MaximoffTrash;5910105]So does Lore introduced the mutants then?
Anyway I don't want them in MoM, and if there is a Lore-Wanda as the villain, she should serve main Wanda and Stephen's narrative.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=GenericUsername;5910142]The same mutant rumor has been moved around since Endgame. If it doesn't happen in Strange 2, the rumor will then move to Thor, lol.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=CJStriker;5910254]I really don’t want to care at all about leaks cause so many just be the title’s of them have been so over the top it makes the WandaVision ones look humble, but I have to just post about this one cause it is leaks that are going around like these that are so contrary to the reality of the story the MCU and Fiege is planned out so far for Wanda.
WandaVision already revealed by Fiege himself about No Strange at the end of the last episode cause the whole wanted to avoid the Mansplaning problem. This one would totally undercut all of that completely and that is why I find it just more Clickbait sensationalings to get clicks and likes by the leakers.
The leaks are IMO by just their titles become so over the top that if was a Major Doctor Strange fan I be ticked off if this was really HIS movie anymore or not, lol! :p[/QUOTE]
Well, Multiverse of Madness was originally suppose to come out before Spider-Man: No Way Home and set-up the events of that multiverse Spider-Man movie.
[QUOTE=leokearon;5910294]Not more stupid evil Wanda/Reverse Hom "leaks". Can we just stop listening and posting so called leaks and spoilers, this it;s the same old crap over and over again.[/QUOTE]
Why do people keep calling it “Reverse HoM”? It is literally just House of M! I mean, the whole premise is about Wanda creating a new reality where the mutant population is increased.
[QUOTE=The Agent of Chaos;5910963]Why do people keep calling it “Reverse HoM”? It is literally just House of M! I mean, the whole premise is about Wanda creating a new reality where the mutant population is increased.[/QUOTE]
Many people online who want to see this happen (e.g. not very many people) haven't even read House of M, they just know about "No more mutants," which somehow has become a meme that is at least somewhat familiar even to people who haven't read the story, like Spider-Man selling his marriage to the devil or Wanda's kids turning out to be demon hands.
So when people say "Reverse HoM" they're just talking about a big moment when Wanda does some kind of mutant-related spell. They're never going to give up making rumors about it.
[QUOTE=gurkle;5910999]Many people online who want to see this happen (e.g. not very many people) haven't even read House of M, they just know about "No more mutants," which somehow has become a meme that is at least somewhat familiar even to people who haven't read the story, like Spider-Man selling his marriage to the devil or Wanda's kids turning out to be demon hands.
So when people say "Reverse HoM" they're just talking about a big moment when Wanda does some kind of mutant-related spell. They're never going to give up making rumors about it.[/QUOTE]
I’m pretty sure leokearon (person I quoted) is familiar with the premise though. Even plenty of other comic readers call it that.
[QUOTE=The Agent of Chaos;5911052]I’m pretty sure leokearon (person I quoted) is familiar with the premise though. Even plenty of other comic readers call it that.[/QUOTE]
When people are talking about "reverse HoM", they are mainly talking about the opposite of "no more mutants", so basically introduce mutants through Wanda being used as a plot device.
They are talking about the results, not the "fake reality".
[QUOTE=The Agent of Chaos;5910963]It certainly has been done before. For example: Logan used the character [URL="https://comicvine.gamespot.com/albert/4005-15689/"]Albert[/URL] as the inspiration for [I]X-24[/I].
Well, Multiverse of Madness was originally suppose to come out before Spider-Man: No Way Home and set-up the events of that multiverse Spider-Man movie.
Why do people keep calling it “Reverse HoM”? It is literally just House of M! I mean, the whole premise is about Wanda creating a new reality where the mutant population is increased.[/QUOTE]
I'm not talking about the rumor being for ITMoM. It has been for every movie since Endgame. People were rumoring it before the ink was dry on the Disney/Fox deal.
And Wanda didn't bring mutants about in HoM. She created an alt reality. A fake one btw. That favored mutants. It didn't create them, didn't bring back the ones depowered, nor the ones killed off from being depowered. She wasn't even using her own powers to do it. At the end of it she does the No More Mutants thing, which depowers them. Killing off an untold amount of people. So when people say the reverse of that, they mean she's powering mutants, bringing them in. The opposite of the end of the event.
[QUOTE=GenericUsername;5911098]I'm not talking about the rumor being for ITMoM. It has been for every movie since Endgame. People were rumoring it before the ink was dry on the Disney/Fox deal.
And Wanda didn't bring mutants about in HoM. She created an alt reality. A fake one btw. That favored mutants. It didn't create them, didn't bring back the ones depowered, nor the ones killed off from being depowered. She wasn't even using her own powers to do it. At the end of it she does the No More Mutants thing, which depowers them. Killing off an untold amount of people. So when people say the reverse of that, they mean she's powering mutants, bringing them in. The opposite of the end of the event.[/QUOTE]
If I recall correctly, non-mutant humans did become a minority due to mutants reproducing more in that reality's history.
[QUOTE=The Agent of Chaos;5911119]If I recall correctly, non-mutant humans did become a minority due to mutants reproducing more in that reality's history.[/QUOTE]
It was all fake. All an illusion that Wolverine figures out. In the end, mutants are reduced down to 250 total.
[QUOTE=GenericUsername;5911122]It was all fake. All an illusion that Wolverine figures out. In the end, mutants are reduced down to 250 total.[/QUOTE]
I know, I've read it.