[url]https://thesimplecinephile.com/2019/05/17/cateshortland/[/url]
Printable View
[url]https://thesimplecinephile.com/2019/05/17/cateshortland/[/url]
I bought both the BW ongoings the past few years. Despite my support BW as a lead dropped from one, 18 issues to 12 the next.
When this was listed as a mini I immediately said...trade wait. My support dollars didn't mean squat as I saw it.
Yu's Black Widow. :)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]82478[/ATTACH]
What?:eek:
[url]https://www.cbr.com/when-does-black-widow-movie-take-place/[/url]
[QUOTE=Winterboy;4362440]What?:eek:
[url]https://www.cbr.com/when-does-black-widow-movie-take-place/[/url][/QUOTE]
I would take the word of an actor, who hasn't even been officially announced as part of the cast, with a huge grain of salt. Would be interesting to see if true, though.
[QUOTE=Winterboy;4362440]What?:eek:
[url]https://www.cbr.com/when-does-black-widow-movie-take-place/[/url][/QUOTE]
Would work a little better with my thought of the Red Room cloning being a credits scene.
ON BLACK WIDOW AND THE EXPENDABILITY OF CHILDLESS WOMEN
[url]https://wearyourvoicemag.com/culture/black-widow-expendability-childless-women[/url]
NATASHA’S “SACRIFICE” SENDS THE DETESTABLE MESSAGE THAT THE ONLY VALUE THAT CHILDLESS WOMEN HAVE TO OUR LARGER SOCIETY IS IN DEATH.
that's a big yikes from me doogie
[ATTACH=CONFIG]82563[/ATTACH]
:)
[QUOTE=Witchfan;4363383]ON BLACK WIDOW AND THE EXPENDABILITY OF CHILDLESS WOMEN
[url]https://wearyourvoicemag.com/culture/black-widow-expendability-childless-women[/url]
NATASHA’S “SACRIFICE” SENDS THE DETESTABLE MESSAGE THAT THE ONLY VALUE THAT CHILDLESS WOMEN HAVE TO OUR LARGER SOCIETY IS IN DEATH.[/QUOTE]
This is along the lines of what gurkle was saying a few pages back, and tbh I sort of agree. The juxtaposition of Hawkeye's tearjerker family arc with the subtext of Natasha's infertility plot from AoU is ... not ideal lol
(warning I am inclined to agree with any take that says Natasha dying was bad)
Nat and Matt by Joe Chiodo. :)
[ATTACH=CONFIG]82636[/ATTACH]
[video=youtube;taPxLlG_UkY]https://youtube.com/watch?v=taPxLlG_UkY[/video]
beet the universe
Got it! :cool:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]82660[/ATTACH]
Awesome!
INVISIBLE WOMAN #2 (OF 5)
MARK WAID (W) • MATTIA DE IULIS (A)
Cover by ADAM HUGHES
Variant Cover by AMANDA CONNER
Susan Richards, the Invisible Woman, forms an unlikely — and uneasy — alliance with fellow spy the Black Widow to comb the alleys and palaces of Madripoor! They’re searching for Sue Richards’ first partner — but what they discover will shake Sue to the core and turn her mission upside down!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]82709[/ATTACH]
[QUOTE=Winterboy;4372797]Awesome!
INVISIBLE WOMAN #2 (OF 5)
MARK WAID (W) • MATTIA DE IULIS (A)
Cover by ADAM HUGHES
Variant Cover by AMANDA CONNER
[B]Susan Richards, the Invisible Woman, forms an unlikely — and uneasy — alliance with fellow spy the Black Widow[/B] to comb the alleys and palaces of Madripoor! They’re searching for Sue Richards’ first partner — but what they discover will shake Sue to the core and turn her mission upside down!
[ATTACH=CONFIG]82709[/ATTACH][/QUOTE]
Grouping Sue and Natasha into the same category, spy, just sounds so wrong.