-
[QUOTE=TheCape;5039668]So where do you think is Jean going after this, i'm sure that she will still be in X-Force for a couple of issues, but what is her next step after she quits.[/QUOTE]
X of Swords. She'll be busy in that which wont end until Nov barring any delays. We dont know what the X-landscape will be by December so its too soon for really anyone to guess
-
[QUOTE=Ferro;5039618]well im not a fan, but there is a chance taylor comes back sooooo maybe that's why?[/QUOTE]
of course I would like to Taylor to get jean away from bad writing but I don't see his vision for the character matching the one from hickman.
If he writes her on Moira book it will be only flashbacks, if the rumor is right. I think the free comic day story is about a avengers/marvel universe/x-men crossover/story that is gonna happen on the end of year.
[QUOTE=Will Evans;5039653]She’s killing all the prudes right now.[/QUOTE]
I'm not a prude, i just a fan of good writing and character coerence.
people has to stop calling other "prudes"
[QUOTE=CRaymond;5039652]Jean needs to kill someone she doesn't need to kill. That'd be nice to read.[/QUOTE]
no, she already did that in billions brocollis
-
Jean's stunt in today's issue was great. Really loving the creativity Percy is bringing, and not seeing the same old force fields/mind blasts that we are use to.
Also, Jean's been attracted to Logan for decades. Its been a part of her character for a long time. Saying otherwise is just inaccurate.
-
[QUOTE=Soulsword323;5039686]Jean's stunt in today's issue was great. Really loving the creativity Percy is bringing, and not seeing the same old force fields/mind blasts that we are use to.
Also, Jean's been attracted to Logan for decades. Its been a part of her character for a long time. Saying otherwise is just inaccurate.[/QUOTE]
jean attraction to Logan is not the big deal people make it to be. It happened few times and was purely phisical.
People make it a bigger thing than it was. she was also attracted to Gambit and Fantomex, I don't see peopel shipping her with them
-
[QUOTE=spirit2011;5039494][spoil] well it's out of character, but OOC is the new way writers choose to write. i still don't think polyamor is any true, you can bet there will be a plot twist. never that Marvel would aloow it to happen[/spoil]
They are all grown up kids, Cable is 15/16, Rachel is a young adult. I see no need to stick together for kids.
For me Krakoa is the most forced status ever, Jean and Cyclops living on same house is very forced.[/QUOTE]
Well, the point of the kids is they never have been together as a family. They being together for the kids, is not meant for nurturing Nathan and Rachel, but more like just a sense of togetherness. Which explains why all the Summers are on there.
Polyamorous setup is waaaayyyy too much for me. But we'll see.
-
[QUOTE=spirit2011;5039693]jean attraction to Logan is not the big deal people make it to be. It happened few times and was purely phisical.
People make it a bigger thing than it was. she was also attracted to Gambit and Fantomex, I don't see peopel shipping her with them[/QUOTE]
None of those were anything consistent and definitely not on the same level. Jean and Logan have been a thing in multiple AR, forms of media and plenty of teases in the main universe. Its really not that hard to see why they have people that ship them. Marvel has given them material to ship. There is no breadth of Jean and Fantomex interaction to even gain much traction
-
[QUOTE=spirit2011;5039693]jean attraction to Logan is not the big deal people make it to be. It happened few times and was purely phisical.
People make it a bigger thing than it was. she was also attracted to Gambit and Fantomex, I don't see peopel shipping her with them[/QUOTE]
They don't just have an attraction. They have a deep friendship as well, and have a much stronger connection to one another than Gambit or Fantomex. This goes back to the 80s.
-
How come no one is commenting about Wolverine's unsubtle and illicit comment that Colossus "has a big everything"?
I think I convene the Heads of Gay to acknowledge the taxonomy of Bears under 5'8" be classified as Wolverines.
-
[QUOTE=Soulsword323;5039710]They don't just have an attraction. They have a deep friendship as well, and have a much stronger connection to one another than Gambit or Fantomex. This goes back to the 80s.[/QUOTE]
That still doesn't make it a excuse for relationship. Friendship isn't the same as romantic sexual relationship
-
[QUOTE=spirit2011;5039716]Friendship isn't the same as romantic sexual relationship[/QUOTE]
The best ones are.
-
[QUOTE=Soulsword323;5039655]Percy's mind.
Jean was stellar in today's issue. Love that she's getting action on the side too. And in a pool? Kinky.[/QUOTE]
Pool sex is hardly the height of kink! Though they were public baths...
-
[QUOTE=mike7171;5039694]Well, the point of the kids is they never have been together as a family. They being together for the kids, is not meant for nurturing Nathan and Rachel, but more like just a sense of togetherness. Which explains why all the Summers are on there.
Polyamorous setup is waaaayyyy too much for me. But we'll see.[/QUOTE]
IDK people live separated from parents just fine. It is just regressive stay "together" for the display to kids that aren't even kids.
It was time to Jean explore new things as a single woman, tha tis exciting instead of the same thing all over again
-
[QUOTE=spirit2011;5039716]That still doesn't make it a excuse for relationship. Friendship isn't the same as romantic sexual relationship[/QUOTE]
Jean and Scott were friends long before they entered into a relationship. Being friends first can be a good foundation for that
[QUOTE=spirit2011;5039722]IDK people live separated from parents just fine. It is just regressive stay "together" for the display to kids that aren't even kids.
It was time to Jean explore new things as a single woman, tha tis exciting instead of the same thing all over again[/QUOTE]
It would be regressive if this were something we've seen before, but its not. This is a new status quo for this family and quite progressive
-
[QUOTE=CRaymond;5039711]How come no one is commenting about Wolverine's unsubtle and illicit comment that Colossus "has a big everything"?
I think I convene the Heads of Gay to acknowledge the taxonomy of Bears under 5'8" be classified as Wolverines.[/QUOTE]
I mean, other women acknowledge Powergirl’s boobs.
I doubt anyone will say Colossus is flaccid.
-
[QUOTE=Havok83;5039704]None of those were anything consistent and definitely not on the same level. Jean and Logan have been a thing in multiple AR, forms of media and plenty of teases in the main universe. Its really not that hard to see why they have people that ship them. Marvel has given them material to ship. There is no breadth of Jean and Fantomex interaction to even gain much traction[/QUOTE]
Other media has no bearing on the comics, they aren't canon for starters. people shipping them doesn't make for the lack of development.
Jean have a longer friendship with Logan, but that is it.
[QUOTE=CRaymond;5039711]How come no one is commenting about Wolverine's unsubtle and illicit comment that Colossus "has a big everything"?
I think I convene the Heads of Gay to acknowledge the taxonomy of Bears under 5'8" be classified as Wolverines.[/QUOTE]
that is just a joke. would be weirder if Logan said he is big at everything except his ***k
that would raise my suspicions
[QUOTE=Havok83;5039723]Jean and Scott were friends long before they entered into a relationship. Being friends first can be a good foundation for that
It would be regressive if this were something we've seen before, but its not. This is a new status quo for this family and quite progressive[/QUOTE]
They had tons of unrequited love for each other since x-men #6, their internal thoughts about each other were always romantic. It was a slow burn romance, Logan and Jean were never like that