-
[QUOTE=Ascended;3811615]
Jane-Thor especially has proven highly popular. I could easily see the MCU trying their hand at that story once Hemsworth steps back. It won't be with Portman, but they've recast bigger roles than Jane Foster. And it won't be with Mjolnir (unless Peter Dinklage re-forges it) but you can always write around it and find a new way in.[/QUOTE]
I think the [I]Captain Marvel [/I]movies will probably go for a lot of what they would probably do with a JaneThor movie.
Personally, I think the only thing it would accomplish to do a Jane Thor movie is to get to the major parts of the Thor mythos that the movies hadn't gotten to yet, like Balder and Enchantress.
[QUOTE]And it wouldn't surprise me if they decided to make either Stan or Mackie the new Captain America once Evans leaves. I dunno if they'll go there, and I won't be surprised if they don't, but it won't surprise me if they do. It's a viable option, yknow?[/QUOTE]
Like with Thor I don't see us getting a new Cap immediately after Evans leaves. I think it's possible either way, but I agree it's equally viable that they might just forge their own paths with their identities (Bucky already has a new one to boot).
-
[video=youtube;gr7Sbu2Zgk4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr7Sbu2Zgk4[/video]
-
[QUOTE=Frontier;3811828]I think the [I]Captain Marvel [/I]movies will probably go for a lot of what they would probably do with a JaneThor movie.[/QUOTE]
Entirely possible. Carol is (should be) working in the same sphere as Jane-Thor, with that earth-cosmic fusion. But it would depend a lot on how they approach the characters. There's plenty of ways to spin either Carol or Jane differently than what we've seen in the comics. Jane could focus more on the mythological side of the franchise, and that alone would separate it considerably from Carol. But who knows? I mean, if they ever did do Jane's story, the movie would look radically different from the comic; in the films Odin is gone, the Warriors Three are gone, Freya is gone, Malekieth is gone, etc etc.
[QUOTE]Like with Thor I don't see us getting a new Cap immediately after Evans leaves. I think it's possible either way, but I agree it's equally viable that they might just forge their own paths with their identities (Bucky already has a new one to boot).[/QUOTE]
I wouldn't think it'd be a change they'd make quickly, if they make it at all. But I really have no idea, I couldn't begin to guess what the studio will do. But I could see it going either way; Cap and Thor are popular IP's and there are plenty of stories to be told with their respective legacies. The studio doesn't need those core IP's to be successful, but that doesn't mean they might not want to keep them around (in some form) anyway.
-
Nick Fury and Maria Hill will be in Spider-Man: Far From Home:
[url]https://superbromovies.com/2018/07/25/spider-man-far-from-home-star-seemingly-confirms-maria-hill-will-appear-in-the-film/amp/?__twitter_impression=true[/url]
-
[QUOTE=MindofShadow;3803751]Not all outrage sticks.
Fox simply didn't seem to care. He denied the allegations and since there was no smoking gun... waht can you do?
Gunn's "jokes" pale in comparison to Singers accusations... but Gunn's "jokes" are out there for all to see.[/QUOTE]
The issue with Gunn is that he crossed a line on the public sphere that is mostly defered to Comedians and even then, if one of them made a career out of including around 10.000 pedophlia jokes, that person would be booed out of the stage sooner or later.
The kicker is that he`s not a comedian and lacks common sense and the Mouse doesn`t find the combination funny nor are they lacking money making properties.
-
It's too bad about Gunn simply for the fact that I'm sure he really is a good guy and regrets the idiotic, tasteless jokes he made.
But...he [I]did[/I] make them and no matter how nice a guy Gunn may be, defending pedophilia jokes is just not the hill that Disney wants to die on.
It's cool that the cast stands by him but I don't see Disney having a change of heart on this.
-
[QUOTE=Aioros22;3821384]The issue with Gunn is that he crossed a line on the public sphere that is mostly defered to Comedians and even then, if one of them made a career out of including around 10.000 pedophlia jokes, that person would be booed out of the stage sooner or later.
The kicker is that he`s not a comedian and lacks common sense and the Mouse doesn`t find the combination funny nor are they lacking money making properties.[/QUOTE]
Just pop in here to say that he did not make 10000 pedo jokes. Only like 2 dozens or something (on various taboo topics) in total.
Here is a detailed rundown:
[url]https://www.reddit.com/r/marvelstudios/comments/92bgiu/james_gunn_did_not_make_10000_jokes_about_rape/[/url]
-
[QUOTE=Prof. Warren;3821642]It's too bad about Gunn simply for the fact that I'm sure he really is a good guy and regrets the idiotic, tasteless jokes he made.
But...he [I]did[/I] make them and no matter how nice a guy Gunn may be, defending pedophilia jokes is just not the hill that Disney wants to die on.
It's cool that the cast stands by him but I don't see Disney having a change of heart on this.[/QUOTE]
Given how far this has gotten Disney has to say SOMETHING on the matter.
This certainly puts Guardians 3 in limbo for now unless Disney can come to some MIDDLE GROUND in all of this/ I still believe that there has to be a compromise in someway for everyone to be happy.
Because even though DInsey had every right to fire him and how quickly they did it, doesn’t fully make them the good guys in all of this.
There has to be some middle ground in all of this, right. ?
-
Ant-Man should have been released in the fall.
It's doing well, but I feel like coming out in July was a mistake.
I appreciated the small stakes, but I feel like after a run of Thor 3, BP, and IW... all of which ended up in my "best of the best" tier for comic movies... Ant-Man was enjoyable. I needed to see a mediocre Fox or DC movie in between to realize that, oh yeah, it is still good just not "holy shit" good.
It is telling that AM2 can come out to "its good MCU movie" type reviews and make what it did the opening weekend... meanwhile MI6 comes out to "holy shit balls its awesome!" reviews and still lags behind AM2 by like 20 million lol
-
[QUOTE=MindofShadow;3822275]Ant-Man should have been released in the fall.
It's doing well, but I feel like coming out in July was a mistake.
I appreciated the small stakes, but I feel like after a run of Thor 3, BP, and IW... all of which ended up in my "best of the best" tier for comic movies... Ant-Man was enjoyable. I needed to see a mediocre Fox or DC movie in between to realize that, oh yeah, it is still good just not "holy shit" good.
It is telling that AM2 can come out to "its good MCU movie" type reviews and make what it did the opening weekend... meanwhile MI6 comes out to "holy shit balls its awesome!" reviews and still lags behind AM2 by like 20 million lol[/QUOTE]
People [I]love[/I] superheroes. I don't say that lightly. And MCU just puts out easily way above average superhero flick like it's nothing.
And anyway, final numbers are all that matters. Homecoming's opening weekend was lower than both Ragnarok and Deadpool 2, and it still made more than both of those.
-
Ant-Man and the Wasp should have opened in September in a less crowded environment. Too many smaller hits taking away box office from the movie. Even the juggernaut Incredibles 2 took a lot of biz away not to mention the less but still strong Jurassic. Not even sure if Ant-Man will surpass Solo on the domestic front.
-
There will be an Ant-Man 3, but it won't come soon. 2022 will likely be when it will come out, and it won't be a summer release. Marvel has a February 22, 2002 date for a Phase Four film, and I think that Ant-Man 3 will be that one.
-
Anyone here checked out yet the new based Venom trailer? Not technically MCU, at least not yet, but still, this trailer looks much better than the first one.
-
[QUOTE=Venomous Mask;3823098]Anyone here checked out yet the new based Venom trailer? Not technically MCU, at least not yet, but still, this trailer looks much better than the first one.[/QUOTE]
This isn't the thread for Venom and that terrible CGI, cheesy trailer
[quote= Pascal]Here's what we're doing: all these characters are a part of the Marvel comic book universe. In that universe, they are all related to each other. Kevin [Feige] makes characters in the Marvel Cinematic Universe. [B]These characters are separate, except for Spidey,[/B] who belongs in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, which is why he's there.[/quote]
-
[QUOTE=Witchfan;3822523]There will be an Ant-Man 3, but it won't come soon. 2022 will likely be when it will come out, and it won't be a summer release. Marvel has a February 22, 2002 date for a Phase Four film, and I think that Ant-Man 3 will be that one.[/QUOTE]
With the merger, I don't know if we can 100% count on anything other than Spider-Man 2 and 3, Black Panther 2, and GoG3 at this point.