Printable View
So as we twiddle our thumbs waiting 84 years for a good Rogue and/or Gambit appearance ...
Any thoughts on what book Leah Williams will be writing or what book they are bringing Alyssa Wong onto?
Desperately looking for a new writer to rescue Remy ...
Meanwhile I don't think Rogue will be gracing X-Men until Issue #8 and I'm absolutely not buying it again until she appears.
And are they ever going to Gambling World?! I seriously don't have the patience for this pacing or format.
Yeah, I'm curious about those two as well. It seems like Wong is kind of divisive but that feels like a lot of writers anymore.
The pacing of X-Men is seriously starting to frustrate me. It feels like Duggan had a few different ideas for what to do with it and then just kind of crammed them all together. Which can be done, but this just feels sloppy.
[URL="https://twitter.com/samjrakoh/status/1479979142020046848/photo/3"]https://twitter.com/samjrakoh/status/1479979142020046848/photo/3[/URL]
Any idea where the upper left hand pic is from? It's my first time seeing it. The one left of the ShadowKing Takes over Romy Kissing flashback
[QUOTE=smokey78;5894707][URL="https://twitter.com/samjrakoh/status/1479979142020046848/photo/3"]https://twitter.com/samjrakoh/status/1479979142020046848/photo/3[/URL]
Any idea where the upper left hand pic is from? It's my first time seeing it. The one left of the ShadowKing Takes over Romy Kissing flashback[/QUOTE]
It is fan art- [url]https://www.deviantart.com/x-bra/art/Rogue-And-Gambit-By-Leuname-X31-633784795[/url]
Devils Reign X-Men
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJdgtPNXsAInXFk?format=jpg&name=large[/IMG]
Hmm ok. What does that mean, though? lol Is it because they're poker buds?
[QUOTE=Sandmans_Raven;5902285]Hmm ok. What does that mean, though? lol Is it because they're poker buds?[/QUOTE]
Yes, probably about poker game in X-Men 2.
[QUOTE=Purplevit;5902428]Yes, probably about poker game in X-Men 2.[/QUOTE]
That makes sense. It would be cool to see a follow-up game at some point in the future.
I guess, since he was at the game, remy must think that he’s of such a bad guy and so would be disappointed at this? Her reaction is kinda a 180 from the original poker game issue, lol, but okay.
She seemed to be cool about Remy hanging out with Rhino, just not in a public place where paparazzi could see
[QUOTE=Dipter;5902663]She seemed to be cool about Remy hanging out with Rhino, just not in a public place where paparazzi could see[/QUOTE]
Yeah that was my take.
This was a nice little line. Somehow Rogue is getting better use in this tie in and sounds like even better use in the Death of Dr. Strange/Black Knight/X-Men issue by Spurrier, than in her home book.
But I suppose we just enjoy the crumbs we get at this point.
David Talaski variant for X-MEN ‘92: HOUSE OF XCII #1
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJjOtufXMAEJHKw?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG]
[QUOTE=AppleJ;5903188]Yeah that was my take.
This was a nice little line. Somehow Rogue is getting better use in this tie in and sounds like even better use in the Death of Dr. Strange/Black Knight/X-Men issue by Spurrier, than in her home book.
But I suppose we just enjoy the crumbs we get at this point.[/QUOTE]
The X-Men/Black Knight one-shot was overall well written and Rogue was actually useful
[QUOTE=Purplevit;5904342]David Talaski variant for X-MEN ‘92: HOUSE OF XCII #1
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJjOtufXMAEJHKw?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG][/QUOTE]
Literally the one thing in all the April solicits that I'm at all excited for ... and it's a variant.
When will Gambit and Rogue get some attention again?
[QUOTE=Purplevit;5904342]David Talaski variant for X-MEN ‘92: HOUSE OF XCII #1
[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FJjOtufXMAEJHKw?format=jpg&name=900x900[/IMG][/QUOTE]
This is gorgeous. I wonder if he used the most recent Legends as a reference for them? Their hair looks similar to those sculpts