-
[QUOTE=Things Fall Apart;4289117]Moses Magnum would also be a good villain to show BP defeating. They may want to update him to be a guerilla style warlord, and can have T'challa freeing people from him and accepting them as Wakandan refugees.
They can also use Wakandas expanding global role as a tension point between T'challa and M'Baku.[/QUOTE]
His first appearance is in Spider-Man, Marvel might not even own him
-
[QUOTE=Ezyo1000;4289028][B]You know who we need for this... The other break out princess on BP quest...
I think Zanda and Achebe could work, ESPECIALLY if Zanda was pulled from Pantherjack. A superhuman that can impersonate a person or animal? That could lead to some fun fights as well as intrigue.[/B][/QUOTE]
If she showed up first, the articles on whether she is Mystique or not would be never ending. lol
-
[QUOTE=Things Fall Apart;4288770]I really, really don't get the Logan praise. It was so boring.[/QUOTE]
Oh, that's easy. It's for the same reason folks are hyping [I]The Joker[/I].
Some fans (and many critics) are embarrassed that superhero movies are so popular, so they hype up any movie that has broken characters living depressing lives in drab settings that have tragic things happen to them.
That way, they can point to it and say: "Look! It's so realistic and dramatic! Isn't that so much better than people in bright costumes having exciting adventures in fantastic new worlds? Give them awards!!!"
The fact that people actually [B]like[/B] escapist entertainment is beside the point. What do they know? They aren't as literary as the "true" arbiters of culture. :smh:
(And yes, this is [B]exactly[/B] why Coates got BP. Th capacity for entertainment is secondary to The Message™.)
-
Wondering what the USP of the next film will be.
-
[QUOTE=Cville;4289159]If she showed up first, the articles on whether she is Mystique or not would be never ending. lol[/QUOTE]
Or she could be a Skrull.
-
[QUOTE=moneymen;4288804]You are 100% right. but after Black Panther 1 made so much money. Coogler will make his Vision in BP2 .Like Gunn did with with GOTG 2[/QUOTE]
Gotg2 was horrible.
all those things that you people are saying that coogler did for Marvel you should remember that Marvel did those for coogler as well. Black panther is a Marvel superhero and works best in that dimension not in any type of artsy alternate director's cut universe. I don't want to see long drawn out scenes and hand2hand fights that I would see two humans do. I want to see Black Panther in his full Glory the same way that Captain America was shown in his second movie as opposed to his first. The best thing to collect can do is to put more of a spotlight on who the Black Panther is in why he is to be feared. You should take strong notes from redjacks cartoon version who is the true form of the character. Koogler can still shine spotlights on the outside characters and even bring back his boy Michael b Jordan for a bunch of cameos as far as I'm concerned but hed do better to show Tchalla the respect he deserves in the second movie.
The biggest aspects to the success of black panther wasn't cooler. It was seeing the full actualization of afrofuturism on the big stage and all of its Glory, and that's bigger than any director
-
[QUOTE=XPac;4288987]Coogler has gone on record as saying he wanted to use Kraven but couldn't. I suppose in theor a billion plus dollar movie might grease the wheels a bit if he still wants to use Kraven.[/QUOTE]
Another reason why I'm not fully on the coogler gets to do what he wants train. Wanting to use Kraven is as big a red flag to me as anything that coats said during his interviews leading up to riding black panther and ultimately sidelining him in his own book for his own pet project characters
-
[QUOTE=Lord Morph;4288975]A part of me is still hoping against hope for Namor make his debut with BP2. It just would be a shame if such an iconic dynamic/beef doesn't hit the big screen. With BP3, setting the stage for a BP/Namor/Doom Triple threat. [/QUOTE]
NO
REJECTED.
:mad:
-
[QUOTE=Ekie;4289325]Gotg2 was horrible.
all those things that you people are saying that coogler did for Marvel you should remember that Marvel did those for coogler as well. Black panther is a Marvel superhero and works best in that dimension not in any type of artsy alternate director's cut universe. I don't want to see long drawn out scenes and hand2hand fights that I would see two humans do. I want to see Black Panther in his full Glory the same way that Captain America was shown in his second movie as opposed to his first. The best thing to collect can do is to put more of a spotlight on who the Black Panther is in why he is to be feared. You should take strong notes from redjacks cartoon version who is the true form of the character. Koogler can still shine spotlights on the outside characters and even bring back his boy Michael b Jordan for a bunch of cameos as far as I'm concerned but hed do better to show Tchalla the respect he deserves in the second movie.
The biggest aspects to the success of black panther wasn't cooler. It was seeing the full actualization of afrofuturism on the big stage and all of its Glory, and that's bigger than any director[/QUOTE]
If you somehow think any director can depict Afrofuturism as well as it should be on screen, and none of how Wakanda was depicted came from Coogler, then you're not really aware of how good filmmaking works and how much of Coogler's vision was realised.
How many directors do you know that would go to more than one country just to get inspiration, because Coogler did that. Plus, he's the one that got the production designer, the costume designer, and the composer on board. Those people are his friends and we most likely wouldn't have got any of them if he wasn't involved. And those guys can't just do what they want either. They have to realise the director's vision and what he wants, so he has the ideas, they share their own and collaborate.
Afrofuturism may be bigger than any director but why did it take Black Panther a film by Coogler to show how great it is? If anybody could do it, why is Coates failing at it? A lesser director wouldn't have delivered this movie as it is. I mean shit, compare the Russo's Wakanda to Coogler's and there's a clear difference.
As for shining the spotlight on others, it's not Coogler's fault the MCU doesn't know what a good supporting cast looks like outside of the Avengers movies. It took that franchise 8 years to put out another noteworthy villain since Loki in Thor 1. It's not his fault every other villain aside from Loki before Killmonger was shit and forgettable. That's why Killmonger (and Thanos) is getting all the attention. If this was common for the MCU it wouldn't be a big deal.
Like damn, it's not Coogler's fault he made a well written, well researched, well acted and well directed movie all across the board and told the rest of the MCU to step their game up. Why should he be judged for that?
Sometimes I think some of you have let the BP "criticisms" get to you.
-
Some people aren't happy unless they have something to complain about.
Coogler made one of the most socially popular, critically approved and financially successful movies in cinematic history.
But clearly, it wasn't his doing, because then they would have to admit that something good happened.
-
[B]Black Panther’ Goes From Tentpole To Cultural Milestone: No. 2 In 2018 Most Valuable Blockbuster Tournament[/B]
[URL="https://deadline.com/2019/04/black-panther-goes-from-tentpole-to-cultural-milestone-no-2-in-2018-most-valuable-blockbuster-tournament-1202587563/"]https://deadline.com/2019/04/black-panther-goes-from-tentpole-to-cultural-milestone-no-2-in-2018-most-valuable-blockbuster-tournament-1202587563/[/URL]
-
[QUOTE=Blind Wedjat;4288824]
It's the only way I could see it working if they're bring Killmonger back fully but I really doubt it.[/QUOTE]
What about Kingpin? We saw how he worked in Spiderverse.
Or the Wrecking Crew. Remember Thunderball is NOT a dummy.
Or stay internal with Vibraxas-who doesn't like the fact Wakanda open it doors to the world.
-
[QUOTE=skyvolt2000;4289521]What about Kingpin? We saw how he worked in Spiderverse.
Or the Wrecking Crew. Remember Thunderball is NOT a dummy.
Or stay internal with[B] Vibraxas-who doesn't like the fact Wakanda open it doors to the world[/B].[/QUOTE]
was this when he was first introduced? I only read his bio that said he gained his powers and was sent to America.
-
[QUOTE=Ekie;4289325]Gotg2 was horrible.
all those things that you people are saying that coogler did for Marvel you should remember that Marvel did those for coogler as well. Black panther is a Marvel superhero and works best in that dimension not in any type of artsy alternate director's cut universe. I don't want to see long drawn out scenes and hand2hand fights that I would see two humans do. I want to see Black Panther in his full Glory the same way that Captain America was shown in his second movie as opposed to his first. The best thing to collect can do is to put more of a spotlight on who the Black Panther is in why he is to be feared. You should take strong notes from redjacks cartoon version who is the true form of the character. Koogler can still shine spotlights on the outside characters and even bring back his boy Michael b Jordan for a bunch of cameos as far as I'm concerned but hed do better to show Tchalla the respect he deserves in the second movie.
The biggest aspects to the success of black panther wasn't cooler. It was seeing the full actualization of afrofuturism on the big stage and all of its Glory, and that's bigger than any director[/QUOTE]
[B]I would say, the most noteworthy part's of BP that people here and elsewhere praise, is when Coogler goes outside the formula and gets to flex his creative muscles. And actually longer shot fight scenes are better then a bunch of edits because it allows you to appreciate the choreography of the actors, hence why people love Okoyes casino scene so much. And your right, it wasn't just Coogler, ot was Cole, T'Chadwick for fighting for having authentic African accents and not British ones, the whole crew putting in work and doing something different but this was still based off of Cooglers vision.
Coogler respects Tchalla, hence why he took the time to build his world and his supporting cast so we actually had characters to talk about and Care about.. unless the cool thing is to give supporting cast the Thor treatment (replacing the entire supporting cast, and grabbed hulk, killed off the warrior's three and no one gave a shit, one of the warrior's 3 actors was different from Thor 1 to Thor 2 and NOBODY noticed)
I mean damn, people act like there needs to be huge sweeping changes to the sequel as if it did Ant-Man numbers. Movie was a straight up unstoppable juggernaut both commercially, socially, and culturally.. i think the changes some people are asking for would actually be a detriment[/B]
-
[QUOTE=Cville;4289552]was this when he was first introduced? I only read his bio that said he gained his powers and was sent to America.[/QUOTE]
I think he was speaking of potential motivations in the MCU.
-
[QUOTE=MindofShadow;4288525]Hickman's entire run.
Plus, Coates doesn't play in the universe. So it won't be until he is done at the earliest.
Plus, if there was a marvel wide crossover thing, Wakanda would just get blown up again and everyone would get mad lol.
The time to raise T'challa's profile in the comic world came and went. That is pretty much over. We kinda made it? and blew it at the same time. Ain't nothing going to change until maybe BP2.
you are getting predictable lol.
I don't want to BP Coogler movie. I want a BP MCU Coogler movie. I want my third act mega fight fest. I want rhinos, invisible ships, shield cloaks, barking large dudes, and kymoyo beads that magically cure paralysis.
I don't want some stupid indy boring ass movie like that Joker movie. People overreact everytime a white actor acts a bit creepy on screen. BP will make more in its first weekend than that movie will make in its entire run.
The great thing Coogler did was create a great movie within the confines of the MCU. to the point it transcended a bit. Why can't he be allowed to... do that again?[/QUOTE]
Coogler BP movie >> BP MCU Coogler movie
The specificity he'd create within the movie would be one the greatest [B]films [/B]of all time.
They're not going to let him do it, but just saying it would.
Shot on film, real locations, 100% focused on the weight of its themes, etc.
Again it won't happen. But damn would it be perfect.
-
[QUOTE=Ezyo1000;4288711][B]This is another important thing to note. People keep acting like Coogler needs to "Watch out" for these other movies and feel threatened by another movie. Which for one is dumb. No one should hope a fellow director should fail to protect their ego (abd if they are then they have a fragile ego and need to get over it) or dramatically change their process or the process of the company they are working for because.... Their first movie was a massive success and a cultural event in itself? So why are people wanting this change exactly??
The only things I would like to seen different are minor. Brighting the trafficker scene in the theater version, got that W'kabi and Okoye scene, cleaned up the CGI in the first 15 sec of the mine fight, and added in something showing that Tchalla created some tech other then his CW habit (the employee beads would've been an easy thing to give him credit for)
But those are minor compared to everything done right. So why ask for dramatic change when Coogler has shown he can step up abd deliver a colossal success without needing to go indie on it [/B][/QUOTE]
I get and for the most part agree with what you're saying.
However, Creed, Fruitvale Station truly [B]look[/B] like different movies compared to Black Panther. They really did put the shackles on Coogler/Morrison's visuals. Its still better than most (if not all) Marvel films. Its just why hold back on cinematography, and story telling (3rd act) to remind the audience this is an MCU movie?
Feels like a Jay Z "dumbed down for my audience to double my dollars"
If Coogler didn't show clearly robbed of a Best Director nom worthy efforts in previous films I wouldn't sweat it so much. I love BP, the best MCU film to me, but I do think its clearly his 3rd best [I]directed [/I]film imo. My 2nd favorite overall though after Creed.
-
[QUOTE=Klaue's Mixtape;4289632]Coogler BP movie >> BP MCU Coogler movie
The specificity he'd create within the movie would be one the greatest [B]films [/B]of all time.
They're not going to let him do it, but just saying it would.
Shot on film, real locations, 100% focused on the weight of its themes, etc.
Again it won't happen. But damn would it be perfect.[/QUOTE]
Yeah because im sure coogler knows how to navigate the political aspects of shooting in different countries.
-
One thing I know from being a Craftsman/artist?, is you have to become more creative when put in a box. When you're in a drawing class or have to draw or sculpt your 6001st Tweety Bird or Micky Mouse, if the work ethic and passion are in you, you make the best damn Tweety or Micky you can. True artists/craftsmen do break the rules even if they are in a box. Coogler expanded the box and will do so again. Plus, the demographic BP reps was famished. And those outside the demographic ain't never tasted shit like that. BPII is gonna be the second helping. Just sayin
-
[QUOTE=Beware Of Geek;4289438]Some people aren't happy unless they have something to complain about.
Coogler made one of the most socially popular, critically approved and financially successful movies in cinematic history.
But clearly, it wasn't his doing, because then they would have to admit that something good happened.[/QUOTE]
Preach!
[QUOTE=skyvolt2000;4289521]What about Kingpin? We saw how he worked in Spiderverse.
Or the Wrecking Crew. Remember Thunderball is NOT a dummy.
Or stay internal with Vibraxas-who doesn't like the fact Wakanda open it doors to the world.[/QUOTE]
Making Vibraxas a villain would be interesting. Let his powers disrupt the suit and you have a built in cinematically cool fight
[QUOTE=moneymen;4289719]All the best parts of Black Panther was because Ryan Coogler. One being deep writing. Without him you get Captain Marvel or Antman ok films but nothing to analysis without deeper meanings.[/QUOTE]
Kareem, when did you make a new account again?
-
[QUOTE=Klaue's Mixtape;4289663]I get and for the most part agree with what you're saying.
However, Creed, Fruitvale Station truly [B]look[/B] like different movies compared to Black Panther. They really did put the shackles on Coogler/Morrison's visuals. Its still better than most (if not all) Marvel films. Its just why hold back on cinematography, and story telling (3rd act) to remind the audience this is an MCU movie?
Feels like a Jay Z "dumbed down for my audience to double my dollars"
If Coogler didn't show clearly robbed of a Best Director nom worthy efforts in previous films I wouldn't sweat it so much. I love BP, the best MCU film to me, but I do think its clearly his 3rd best [I]directed [/I]film imo. My 2nd favorite overall though after Creed.[/QUOTE]
[B] Someone please post all the accolade's BP has gotten since it's release so we can see just how many shackles Coogler was brought down with.[/B]
-
Some people just like being miserable
-
I'm new but dangit you will not Slam Coogler
-
I honestly think that some fans [U]want[/U] the movies to fail, possibly so they can justify their fan rage or point to them and say "See? I was right about how the character should be written!"
I have a long memory, and I can clearly remember folks getting upset before the movies came out:
[LIST][*]When they saw that part of [I]Age Of Ultron[/I] took place in a somewhat low-income area of Addis Ababa, they [U]immediately[/U] jumped to the conclusion that it was doubling for Wakanda, and the movie would suck. They were wrong. It wasn't doubling for anything.[*]When they heard that Coogler was filming in Atlanta, they [U]immediately[/U] jumped to the conclusion that most of the film would take place in the US, and the movie would suck. They were wrong. Only a few flashbacks and the very end of the film are in America.[*]When they saw that Bucky and the "Secret Avengers" were hiding out in Wakanda, they [U]immediately[/U] jumped to the conclusion that said heroes would play a big part in the movie's climax, and the movie would suck. They were wrong. The only non-Panther character shows up in a stinger and had no impact on the plot.[/LIST]
Notice a pattern?
Of course, Marvel is playing their cards for [I]Endgame[/I] close to the chest, and I believe [I]BP2[/I] hasn't even started production yet, so the only thing they can do is revisit the first film and reveal that, despite having loads of success, Coogler is somehow a hack, and [U]immediately[/U] jump to the conclusion that the [b]next[/b] movie is going to suck….
Guess what I think will happen? Hint: It rhymes with "Play your gong". :cool:
-
[QUOTE=Beware Of Geek;4290255][*]When they saw that Bucky and the "Secret Avengers" were hiding out in Wakanda, they [U]immediately[/U] jumped to the conclusion that said heroes would play a big part in the movie's climax, and the movie would suck. They were wrong. The only non-Panther character shows up in a stinger and had no impact on the plot.[/LIST]
[/QUOTE]
Ahh yes, the Bucky/Cap/Falcon were going to save Wakanda in the third act theory.
That was always good for a multi page disagreement
"the mcu is all connected! Avengers are there!"
"dude, no way they will do that"
"but muh shoe horn! connected! just makes sense"
fun times
-
Was looking up capoeira stuff on YouTube and found this Brazillian capoeira movie called The Assailant (AKA Beetle/Besouro in Brazil). It's apparently based on a real capoeirista but it mixes a bit of mysticism and myth but it's set in the 1920s.
[video=youtube;ghmo7_5A8U8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ghmo7_5A8U8[/video]
Anyway I haven't watched the whole thing yet but it's got some killer fight scenes, especially because it combines capoeira and the Hong Kong cinema style choreography and wirework. The fight choreography was done by the legendary Huan-Chiu Ku, who did The Matrix, Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon, Kill Bill, Into the Badlands, and a bunch of other martial arts movies (so you're definitely gonna like this @Rumble).
After checking out stuff from the film I think this guy and this style would be a perfect fit for the BP sequel. Capoeira was used extensively in the first one but this movie takes it to another level because it's also a bit of a fantasy film. Also Coogler does seem to watch and check out a lot of foreign films so I'm hoping he notices this one. [URL="https://www.lmmt.com.br/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/pantera-ailton.jpg"]And the main actor of the film kinda looks like Chadwick[/URL] so they might as well get him as the stunt double.
[URL="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qNY103LoYEs"]LINK1[/URL]
[URL="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJzVtXCUik4"]LINK2[/URL]
-
Wasn't bushmaster in Luke Cage using Capoira?
EDIT: and you really don't even need a stunt double that look slike Chadwick. The character should be fighting in a suit/mask for most of the movie. Just pull the camera back and let the stunt doubles do their jump.
And if you have two people of similar power levels fighting each other, you don't even need a ton of wire work.
[img]https://i.imgur.com/pcdC8Br.gif[/img]
-
The stunt double thing is mostly a joke but yes Bushmaster primarily used capoeira with some boxing/muay thai. I like what that movie did because it used capoeira which is a very grounded martial art and infused it with the Crouching Tiger-esque choreography and a superhuman element. Of course superhero movies tend to give their martial arts characters a mix of other forms so it wouldn't just be capoeira. The choreographer clearly knows a bunch of styles but it's his work that I think fits.
-
I want more claw feats.
IDK what you can get away with in a PG13 Marvel movie but need to find that line.
BP's feature tech is the bullet proof suit, force push, and the claws. Those are the three things the focus on heavily.
The suit and push get plenty of feats, the claws... scratched caps shield and..... cut some metal?
Give me more before Logan becomes a thing please
-
If you mean people scratching guys with his claws, I don't think it'll be too much of a problem if they want to show it. Lots of people are shown getting stabbed, cut and even shot in the head in the MCU. That kind of violence shouldn't be a big deal. In that second challenge fight there's actually quite a bit of blood splatter and close ups to wounds when T'Challa and Killmonger cut each other. I want to see more of that.
But if we're talking using them against other materials, I agree we could use more of that but I think we got some nice stuff in the film. Easily tearing off that car door, ripping off a moving car tire, using them to make a sharp turn on the road with a car. He's also shown to be able to scratch Vibranium a bunch of times. I do get what you mean though. If they can show him use them creatively to get out of a tough situation it'll be cool.
-
I want him to be able to turn on the Antimetal feature of his claws. Like basically make it cut through metal like the lightsabers in episode one but much, much faster.
It would have been cool to have him do it casually in front of Iron Man, then just run off and keep fighting or doing whatever it was he was doing, and then show Stark just dumbfounded and kind of touching his suit like, "Oh ####, I should probably do an upgrade."
-
This is the somewhat weird thing about the anti-metal claws. It's said the claws aren't pure anti-metal but an alloy (to stop it from melting his gloves I presume). If it's a weaker version of anti-metal then why should does it need to be anti-metal? I'm pretty sure vibranium can cut right through Iron Man's armour. Steve was able to do it with a blunt vibranium shield. I just don't see what the big difference would be. Unless T'Challa's gonna be fighting guys that use vibranium also or adamantium I don't see the point in there being a difference.
I guess theoretically they should be able to cut things even easier but T'Challa's got enhanced strength, speed and vibranium is still one of the strongest metals ever.
-
[QUOTE=Blind Wedjat;4290628]This is the somewhat weird thing about the anti-metal claws. It's said the claws aren't pure anti-metal but an alloy (to stop it from melting his gloves I presume). If it's a weaker version of anti-metal then why should does it need to be anti-metal? I'm pretty sure vibranium can cut right through Iron Man's armour. Steve was able to do it with a blunt vibranium shield. I just don't see what the big difference would be. Unless T'Challa's gonna be fighting guys that use vibranium also or adamantium I don't see the point in there being a difference.
I guess theoretically they should be able to cut things even easier but T'Challa's got enhanced strength, speed and vibranium is still one of the strongest metals ever.[/QUOTE]
Priest probably understood Vibranium doesn't make a good offensive weapon. The past few years the properties of Vb tend to get confused with simply being a hard metal.
-
[QUOTE=Blind Wedjat;4290628]This is the somewhat weird thing about the anti-metal claws. It's said the claws aren't pure anti-metal but an alloy (to stop it from melting his gloves I presume). If it's a weaker version of anti-metal then why should does it need to be anti-metal? I'm pretty sure vibranium can cut right through Iron Man's armour. Steve was able to do it with a blunt vibranium shield. I just don't see what the big difference would be. Unless T'Challa's gonna be fighting guys that use vibranium also or adamantium I don't see the point in there being a difference.
I guess theoretically they should be able to cut things even easier but T'Challa's got enhanced strength, speed and vibranium is still one of the strongest metals ever.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Cville;4290652]Priest probably understood Vibranium doesn't make a good offensive weapon. The past few years the properties of Vb tend to get confused with simply being a hard metal.[/QUOTE]
Exactly, comic vibranium should be absorbing vibrations... it makes no sense for it to be an offensive weapon.
Steve's shield is an alloid as well I do believe.
The MCU doesn't seem to work that way. As Spider-Man said, it basically makes no damn sense lol
So the MCU version just has vibranium claws just like Cap's shield is pure vibranium
-
IDW panther was decent. Would make a good Sat. morning cartoon. There is a cool tech pull that I want to show the the attachment feature isn't working the way I want.
He basically summons the Panther Hulk Buster out of knowhere like the Ronin Warriors summoning their armor.
-
[QUOTE=Cville;4290652]Priest probably understood Vibranium doesn't make a good offensive weapon. The past few years the properties of Vb tend to get confused with simply being a hard metal.[/QUOTE]
I think the mcu is basically using vibranium as an adamantium substitute where hard metal is needed until they get the real thing.
Now that marvel has the fox stuff, I think we'll get nore precise usage of it.
-
[QUOTE=Cville;4290652]Priest probably understood Vibranium doesn't make a good offensive weapon. The past few years the properties of Vb tend to get confused with simply being a hard metal.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=MindofShadow;4290663]Exactly, comic vibranium should be absorbing vibrations... it makes no sense for it to be an offensive weapon.
Steve's shield is an alloid as well I do believe.
The MCU doesn't seem to work that way. As Spider-Man said, it basically makes no damn sense lol
So the MCU version just has vibranium claws just like Cap's shield is pure vibranium[/QUOTE]
I never thought about it that way, so you're both right. Although vibranium would be a good offensive weapon too because it's durable (although not as much as adamantium) and it's why the redirection of energy thing was a good upgrade for the suit. But absorbing energy definitely makes it more defensive/utility.
-
[video=youtube;oUG3zt6EesQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oUG3zt6EesQ[/video]
Get this man as Achebe already goddamn. This clip doesn't even show the best part when his African accent came out.
-
[QUOTE=Things Fall Apart;4290559]I want him to be able to turn on the Antimetal feature of his claws. Like basically make it cut through metal like the lightsabers in episode one but much, much faster.
It would have been cool to have him do it casually in front of Iron Man, then just run off and keep fighting or doing whatever it was he was doing, and then show Stark just dumbfounded and kind of touching his suit like, "Oh ####, I should probably do an upgrade."[/QUOTE]
The glowing purple dboi gauntlets could be him turning on the antimental feature. Lightsaber guantlets
-
[ATTACH=CONFIG]80834[/ATTACH]
"I got the horses in the back"
"Can't nobody tell me nothinnn"