Wonder Woman - General Discussion

[QUOTE=Gaius;5825700]Oh right. Clay origin is the opening scene of the show and is in the intro of the animated opening for every episode.[/QUOTE]

Yes! Lean [B][I]into[/I][/B] it!! LOL

[QUOTE=Koriand'r;5825191]Lynda Carter is on Tamron Hall today talking about the loss of her husband Robert Altman.[/QUOTE]

Here it is, she's STILL so beautiful! I don't know what work she's had done but dammit it was successful!

[video=youtube_share;Ofz5oV_7rTk]https://youtu.be/Ofz5oV_7rTk[/video]

[URL="https://aiptcomics.com/2021/11/24/dc-preview-justice-league-dark-vol-2-2021-annual-1/"]Preview for the JLD Annual[/URL]

[QUOTE=Sebastianne;5828315][URL="https://aiptcomics.com/2021/11/24/dc-preview-justice-league-dark-vol-2-2021-annual-1/"]Preview for the JLD Annual[/URL][/QUOTE]

Looks like the beast she was fighting got the best of her easily. Sigh

[QUOTE=Sebastianne;5828315][URL="https://aiptcomics.com/2021/11/24/dc-preview-justice-league-dark-vol-2-2021-annual-1/"]Preview for the JLD Annual[/URL][/QUOTE]

The true world's finest re-united. :p

[QUOTE=Sebastianne;5828315][URL="https://aiptcomics.com/2021/11/24/dc-preview-justice-league-dark-vol-2-2021-annual-1/"]Preview for the JLD Annual[/URL][/QUOTE]
Nice to see Diana back :).

With her hooded cape :p

[QUOTE=Sebastianne;5828315][URL="https://aiptcomics.com/2021/11/24/dc-preview-justice-league-dark-vol-2-2021-annual-1/"]Preview for the JLD Annual[/URL][/QUOTE]

If Wonder Woman is joining the team again, are there any other Wonder Rogues that would make sense for this team to oppose? Queen of Fables makes sense and White Magician would be appropriate. Are there any other magical Wonder foes?

[QUOTE=PopQuezy;5828800]If Wonder Woman is joining the team again, are there any other Wonder Rogues that would make sense for this team to oppose? Queen of Fables makes sense and White Magician would be appropriate. Are there any other magical Wonder foes?[/QUOTE]
The DC Comics version of Morgan Le Fey fought Diana when John Byrne wrote her book. I'd love to see her return.

[QUOTE=Sebastianne;5828637]With her hooded cape :p[/QUOTE]

I find it funny she only seems to wear it when she's with the JLD.

I guess they bring out the moody teenager in her. :p

[QUOTE=Gaius;5828819]I find it funny she only seems to wear it when she's with the JLD.

[B]I guess they bring out the moody teenager in her.[/B] :p[/QUOTE]

Even Diana has an inner edge-lord. :p

It's a magic cape only appears when the justice league dark meets :p

[QUOTE=mystical41;5828335]Looks like the beas she was fighting got the best of her easily. Sigh[/QUOTE]
That might be some uber powerful void between realms beast.

[QUOTE=Rightoya;5829106]That might be some uber powerful void between realms beast.[/QUOTE]

I hope so. But these days WW struggles against plenty of foes that don't really have feats to measure how powerful they are. And since she hasn't been impressive power wise in a while. A lot of people don't have a reason to assume that the threat she struggles against is that strong.

[url]https://tamronhallshow.com/videos/lynda-carter-on-losing-husband-unexpectedly-after-37-years-of-marriage/?[/url]

Another one for the [I]Take It With A Grain of Salt[/I] files: [URL="https://www.thathashtagshow.com/2021/11/24/jason-momoa-wonder-woman-3-details/"]Jason Momoa's Aquaman [May Be] Appearing in Wonder Woman 3 [?][/URL]

Some tidbits that are intriguing (yet, concerning to me):

Remember Arion? He might be the villain. All the wiki pages I see claim he is an old hero of both amazonian and atlantean lore (but nobody expands on the amazonian part. Any WW historians here know anything about this? I had never heard of Arion being a part of amazon history before.

Also...if these rumours are true, no Circe as the villain? Hmm. :mad:

Also, WTF...if they have to bring in Momoa's Aquaman (which I am not against) and ignore Circe in favor of another, much less known villain (which I am definitely against) why not Queen Clea?

Third I am not crazy about this part of the report (and I know that mystical41 won't like this either): "[B]When Arion decisively defeats Wonder Woman [/B]and further puts an alliance between the Amazons and Atlantis at risk, [B]she goes to Aquaman to assist her.[/B]"

That is not necessarily a scenario that thrills me.
Granted, this plot could be explosively action-packed (something that WW84 lacked) and Momoa's billion-dollar-level popular Aquaman could be an asset for the box office prospects of WW3, but I don't know. I gotta be positive. In any case, the final product won't fail or succeed based on who the villains are necessarily. The screenplay needs to be top notch, obviously. Whatever happens, I will keep my fingers crossed and hope for the best...

I'm not going to take this with anything.

It's a dumb click bait article better left ignored. They just want to incite outrage and reactions for clicks.

The original scarped plot for [I]Justice League 3[/I] was to have Aquaman and Wonder Woman take their respective thrones and lead their people into battle despite having once been enemies (or something).

Maybe someone is trying to make that plot-thread fit into Wonder Woman 3 (under the assumption this article has any sense of truth to it, thought it sounds like a load of hog-wash to me).

It's not worth anyone's time or energy.

How can they be so sure that AQ is going to be in it?

Hope it isn't truth. WW3 needs to be about WW and her lore. If not then the curse will carry over from the comics and other media. Where we can hardly have WW content solely focused on her.

Doubt Patty Jenkins will allow Aquaman into Wonder Woman 3. She don't let studios dictate what to do as seen by her walking out of Marvel and Star Wars projects.

[QUOTE=Geraldofrivia;5829691]Doubt Patty Jenkins will allow Aquaman into Wonder Woman 3. She don't let studios dictate what to do as seen by her walking out of Marvel and Star Wars projects.[/QUOTE]

And we got the disaster called WW84!

[QUOTE=BiteTheBullet;5829719]And we got the disaster called WW84![/QUOTE]

"Disaster". And that doesn't nullify all the good work she's done before.

[QUOTE=BiteTheBullet;5829719]And we got the disaster called WW84![/QUOTE]

That's so true.

[QUOTE=John Venus;5829461]It's not worth anyone's time or energy.[/QUOTE]

Exactly. Nuff said.

[QUOTE=BiteTheBullet;5829719]And we got the disaster called WW84![/QUOTE]

She also gave us the amazing (and amazingly well received) [I]Wonder Woman[/I] (2017)!

[QUOTE=HestiasHearth;5830183]She also gave us the amazing (and amazingly well received) [I]Wonder Woman[/I] (2017)![/QUOTE]

Never said anything about the first movie, but Patty was not in control of that movie like she was for WW84

[QUOTE=BiteTheBullet;5830191]Never said anything about the first movie, but Patty was not in control of that movie like she was for WW84[/QUOTE]

She directed it and it was a critical and financial triumph. I celebrate her for giving us a beloved film that happens to star our favorite Themysciran amazon. :D

[QUOTE=HestiasHearth;5830969]She directed it and it was a critical and financial triumph. I celebrate her for giving us a beloved film that happens to star our favorite Themysciran amazon. :D[/QUOTE]

You seem to be missing the point. In the first movie she did not have the control she did like in the 2nd movie, and one movie turned out great while the other should never have been made, or at least been rewritten a dozen times before coming out with that turd of a product.

So, yes, I have always agreed with anyone who says the first movie was good, but what changed between the first and second movie? Articles I have read have stated [I]'Ultimately the film-maker got to make the Wonder Woman movie she wanted to make, without any studio interference – again, a rare achievement in Hollywood'[/I], so why was the 2nd effort so bad? I can only attribute it to that Patty had full control of the picture unlike the first one and she wrote it to boot.

So, here is hoping she leaves herself only to directing duties, they hire top notch writers (not Patty) and hire great action directors to help her with that aspect of the flim.

If patty jenkins has full control over WW3. THen i wouldn't hold my breath expecting great things from that film. Not in terms of powerhouse action and entertainment value. She literally has 0 evidence of being capable of handling those aspects of a super hero film. WW84 totally lacked all that. And WW17 only had no man's land. Which was good but still not on the level of the type of epìc vibe and power, that a character like WW needs to have. So if she has full control. Then i'm expecting another flop.

HBO Max has a french documentary on female superheros that interviews fans/artists/writers.

I always want more of these 2 together
[img]https://www.dccomics.com/sites/default/files/imce/2021/10-OCT/BigBarda_615bb59df21c20.97953268.jpg[/img]
[img]https://static.comicvine.com/uploads/original/6/67330/1955298-wonder_woman_vs_barda8.jpg[/img]
[img]https://comicvine.gamespot.com/a/uploads/scale_super/9/98379/2076667-mm_v3_06_p10.jpg[/img]

[url]https://twitter.com/IronStudios/status/1467181898329993220[/url]

[IMG]https://i.imgur.com/PJc57M1.png[/IMG]

[IMG]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FFx6LtWWQAIKarB?format=jpg&name=medium[/IMG]

So

[spoil] looks like according to a leaked panel, Taylor hooks up Diana with Kara/Supergirl in DKoS #2. [/spoil].

[spoil]Ugh. I'll wait for context before making a judgment, but I just know however awfully Taylor writes Diana for the rest of this series, he's going to use this to pat himself on the back for years.
"Look! I made Diana a lesbian/bisexual in an actual comic!"

It's like how he always busts out that small dream sequence or whatever he wrote in [I]Injustice[/I] where Diana is working for the UN (and married to Batman) as "proof" he actually really loves Wonder Woman and totally gets her.[/spoil]

[QUOTE=Guy_McNichts;5839915][spoil]Ugh. I'll wait for context before making a judgment, but I just know however awfully Taylor writes Diana for the rest of this series, he's going to use this to pat himself on the back for years.
"Look! I made Diana a lesbian/bisexual in an actual comic!"

It's like how he always busts out that small dream sequence or whatever he wrote in [I]Injustice[/I] where Diana is working for the UN (and married to Batman) as "proof" he actually really loves Wonder Woman and totally gets her.[/spoil][/QUOTE]

lol. yeah. He spams that Injustice moment any chance he gets, interesting how "true Wonder Woman" still involves her porking one of the Trinity members in his mind.

[QUOTE=Gaius;5839896]So

[spoil] looks like according to a leaked panel, Taylor hooks up Diana with Kara/Supergirl in DKoS #2. [/spoil].[/QUOTE]

[spoil] …My immediate reaction is “ew” because I always see Kara as a teenager and Diana as a woman way to old to be kissing someone who’s 16… But I guess he made Clark 18 (or something) so I guess Diana is around that age too?[/spoil]

[QUOTE=I'm a Fish;5839982][spoil] …My immediate reaction is “ew” because I always see Kara as a teenager and Diana as a woman way to old to be kissing someone who’s 16… But I guess he made Clark 18 (or something) so I guess Diana is around that age too?[/spoil][/QUOTE]

[spoil] Some have apparently jumped on this has him making it a pedophilic relationship but apparently the character designs for Bruce, Diana, and Clark all call them "Young X" so yeah, she's probably the same age as Kara or Clark. [/spoil]

[QUOTE=Gaius;5839986][spoil] Some have apparently jumped on this has him making it a pedophilic relationship but apparently the character designs for Bruce, Diana, and Clark all call them "Young X" so yeah, she's probably the same age as Kara or Clark. [/spoil][/QUOTE]

[spoil] It's like saying Clark Kent is dating Cassie Sandsmark. Even if they are the same age it's weird. Why couldn't he just make it Powergirl instead of Supergirl. [I]*facepalm*[/I] [/spoil]

[QUOTE=I'm a Fish;5840028][spoil] It's like saying Clark Kent is dating Cassie Sandsmark. Even if they are the same age it's weird. Why couldn't he just make it Powergirl instead of Supergirl. [I]*facepalm*[/I] [/spoil][/QUOTE]

Because [spoil]"Wonder Woman Kisses Supergirl" trends faster on Twitter and is easier for clickbait titles probably lol [/spoil] :p