Search:

Well I'll have to check it out then I suppose. If they are gonna pull this off though it needs to be directly discussed imo. Polyamory is not the sort of thing that works as subtext imo lol, it...

Good lord lol Well is it written well at least? I feel like I could get behind a polyamory angle if its written well, but not gonna lie that sounds like a little too much too quickly lol

Oh no, what is happening with the Hickman run? I keep hearing something about a threesome/polyamory?

A seriously weird tan too.

So with Scott coming back in UX 11, what is there to catch up on with the current status quo? Anything worth reading? I saw someone mention something about Madrox being a villain in another thread,...

Woops. Double post.

My general POV on changing a character's race is that it doesn't really matter to me, so long as the changes to their race don't cause a change in the characterization (whether explicit or just...

Seeing it mentioned and not having kept up with Blue recently, have they addressed the one-sidedness of the rapport at all? As in actually engaged with the fact that it's not a good thing as it...

Question: was there ever a point where Scott would have actually considered retiring? I know that nowadays he definitely wouldn't, but would that have ever been in character for him?

Can we not at least discuss characteristics of this specific section of the run then? Even if it isn't Aaron's complete run, the ending of Jane's tenure as Thor marks a clear section of it at least...

So seeing as I've seen it mentioned a few times here and there, does anyone who enjoyed the run as a whole have anything to say in defense of the whole "all the male characters are incompetent...

True! I just meant that while that character trait isn't inherently bad when he's in a relationship with a telepath, it is bad in a relationship with a non-telepath and either the relationship would...

It's definitely an interesting pattern, though I might disagree that there "isn't anything wrong with it." Not that its a particularly bad or unfaithful way of portraying him and his relationships,...

I suppose I just fall somewhere in between those two options. Removal of guilt would imply that he was already entirely in love with her, which I don't necessarily believe, and making him fall for...

- While it's not an in-story explanation, I'd say the real reason he didn't marry Emma is that editorial didn't want Scott getting married again given the drama of the past (and to a certain extent,...

Honestly, while I think theres discussion to be had as to whether he loved her in Morrison's run (or even after), his marrying Jean and not Emma is probably not the best argument. After how things...

While perhaps not the best of examples, if we're looking for male leaders in the X-Men then Madrox should at least be mentioned lol

This plot point has always struck me as odd whenever it pops in various stories (not specifically Scott and Jean). Does it not take two people mutually deciding to enter a relationship for there to...

Well said! And I didn't mean to imply that some fans are wrong in how they like a character, only that viewing the character's through these lenses can result in drastically different interpretations...

Holy ****. I know that we all like to imagine King on just about any character, but I think he could actually be really well suited to a Cyclops series. Especially with his focus on things like PTSD...

I realize this was conversation has mostly already run it's course, but I just wanted to add something here. There's a difference between people who enjoy both (or all three) characters in their own...

Lol I guess we all called it at least. It's worth noting too that even if the X-Men's goal of stopping Jean from bonding at all was a stupid idea, it would at least be a good idea to try and get Jean...

I mean fair enough lol I just happen to think a) that would at least be more palatable and b) that using his willingness to kill as a rationalization doesn't work given the dialogue.

Well, regardless of whether or not OML makes sense for other reasons (killing if necessary etc.), it doesn't really change the fact that OML's explanation/reasoning was based entirely on his...

Thanks! I remember reading a bit of How to make it a while back, so I'll have to check it out.