Ehh, just because he's in a battle doesn't make it a war.
I really feel like American media likes to keep villains past their expiration dates.
Type: Posts; User: PCN24454
Ehh, just because he's in a battle doesn't make it a war.
I really feel like American media likes to keep villains past their expiration dates.
I always loved his portrayal of Ross in Hulk.
Yeah. The soldier aspect that a lot of superheroes had seems to have been emphasized recently
They're literally beings fighting in a war.
I feel like superhero becomes "beat people up" rather than "helping people" more and more in the minds of the public each day. It's not completely undeserved, but it's still depressing to see.
I think you have it the other way around. Gwen gets a lot of flack because she's not MJ.
The fact that you bring up something that happened when she was still grieving her father's death only...
Of course. Romance is rarely perfect.
Ultimate Spider-Man
Not really. They needed at least ~2 year timeskip between 1 and 2, and that doesn't guarantee that they'll stay together.
An "anti-hero" is just a hero that doesn't fit the standards of being a hero either be it their methods or their personality.
A lot of old characters that would be considered heroes by old...
While the movies may be two hours, they take place over long periods of time. The first movie on its own was at least a couple of months.
Making anti-heroes and "flawed" heroes more feels like an excuse as to why writers can't write nice, healthy relationships.
I don't get this criticism. You could say that about Uncle Ben as well. That's precisely the reason why the MCU doesn't bother to talk about him, and people still call BS on it.
I always wonder if people actually remember what Peter was like in the comics when they complain about him.
Or maybe, it's that they do, and that's why they hate Garfield so much.
Nah, one counterexample doesn't automatically negate others.
After all, does Steve's Company not being racist mean that Isaiah wasn't experimented on because of his color?
It's the fact that things with never change that people will consider it sensitive. It's a futile endeavor.
Wasn't that the point?
None that I know about. It's just a shot. You should make sure to exercise the area where you get the shot.
The Fever only lasted a day, so it really wasn't that bad.
That's a good point. Goliath from Gargoyles was Black-coded for the same reason.
Aren't all Dwarves Scottish-coded?
I would be perfectly ok if they retired the older characters. That's my controversial statement.
The biggest thing hampering the inclusion of new characters to legacies is the presence of the old characters. Tellingly, despite how many Robins and Batgirls there've been, Bruce Wayne has almost...
That's the thing about gray areas. When there's no clear right-or-wrong answer, what do you do?
Making things straighter makes sure that characters aren't just doing nothing.
Not seeing the difference here. Even in the older shows most of his "victories" got nullified by something else.
And he still does that here, so yeah
Which are caused by Peter being much older than Miles. That's like saying that a 20 year old is smarter than a 10 year old. It means absolutely nothing.
Spider-Man getting beat up is not a new trope. That's literally just how comic books work.