Search:

Good luck getting a creative team that will get people hyped after all controversy. Chip wouldn’t take the book before the Wells run, and I’ll bet a lot of writers after seeing this run won’t touch...

At this point it’s more a matter of ego than anything else. It’s clear that the BND status quo is a dead end. That’s why each of Peter’s love interests get progressively less time and development,...

Apparently no one, since editorial won’t let the status quo change even a little bit long term.

People do know that Hickman dropping out of his X run was due to special circumstances, right? Beyond that he’s always finished what he started.

I don’t see the point in getting worked up over people making up stuff on the internet. It happens constantly, so it’s better to just ignore it.

I mean , i don’t think many find the current direction with Ben to be that entertaining as it is. Especially given wells seems to treat the character as a joke.

That"s one of the many reasons these comics suck now. Like the fact you're lumping in Superman and Spider-Man tells the whole story. Superman is supposed to be a Paragon, and living ideal. While...

Since when does anything in this run make sense?

I’d argue that the massive success of USM probably helped create hype for the rest of the Ultimate universe books.

It’s called a supporting character for a reason.

Maybe the fact that major developments like that can be handwaved away is the problem. Why even get invested in these characters and stories if nothing matters.

This is a dumb argument, cause you can just create a new character with the same power set.

This is just getting sad. Dan is just recycling all his well known stories at this point.

Didn’t wells first arc imply he did? Like it was how he ambushed Peter.

Aunt May becomes a goblin.

Does anyone really need to do this? I feel like the whole premise of the series makes it unnecessary.

Whole new universe, for all we know shocker could be top tier.

Jackpot’s a new untried property that’s alienated many of the people who might be interested in the concept. It’s a completely different situation to ASM.

See I seriously doubt MJ can sell comics long term, so the whole endeavour seems like a massive waste of time.

Why do we need a character to be MJ’s boyfriend? Like if they don’t want to write MJ, just don’t write her. The days of her and Peter being just friends is long past. If they aren’t dating just boot...

I think it’s safe to say that I do not like Celeste Bronfman’s writing. It’s just too Saturday morning cartoon for me.

I probably liked Norman better after he came back, then who he was pre death. So yeah, bringing him back was the right move.

If you have any actual evidence the leak was intentional please provide it. Otherwise you’re just yapping.

Is that why they said MJ and Paul were married in a recap page despite that not being the case? Or why they let the death in 26 leak 2 weeks before it came out? Or the fact they let characters...

Why would i pay money for a book I know I won't like?