I think you misunderstood what I meant to say. SW isn't how you introduce them, it's you you end a multi-movie introduction of them.
I don't particularly want to see that, and the premise would...
Type: Posts; User: RockyHorror
I think you misunderstood what I meant to say. SW isn't how you introduce them, it's you you end a multi-movie introduction of them.
I don't particularly want to see that, and the premise would...
Nah he's fine. In fact I think the first avengers comic I ever read was Kang's first appearance.
But as an Avengers-level threat, let alone a Thanos-level threat, he's more than a little...
DS9 continues without Armin. There's no MCU without Josh or someone in that role.
And let's face it. Being the main villain in Ant Man is more than that character deserves on the big screen.
Thank you for that.
What point did I miss? Was I even responding to you?
I really, really don't get the preference for physical resemblance over acting ability to tell a story. It's like an admission you don't want a story, just people punching stuff
Yes and he's a completely different character than Thanos. But in Ant Man, he serves the same purpose as Ronan. He doesn't come close to serving the same purpose as Thanos.
Like I said before,...
Yes, but you cannot have a comedy movie without the climax being a joke
Kang is like Ronan without a single infinity stone. He is nothing like Thanos.
Only C) is not legitimately debatable. B) is not even close. Starlin does not do boring characters.
Cross did not lose his credibility, I think. I'm not suggesting Kang would either. I'm only suggesting that Kang is a big deal to a relative handful of people, and if you're going to use him in a...
Well okay, if you're cool with Kang getting the equivalent of being hit by Thomas the Tank Engine then I guess we don't have a disagreement here. But do keep in mind, he hasn't fought anyone yet, let...
Not sure where you got the idea he said Lee was. I think you misread something.
Ultimately, if you're not comfortable with Kang being the straight man in a comedy, you're probably going to want to stay away from this.
I think it's the only sensible use of the character. He...
I think the role should be recast, to send a message and to ensure the future of the entire MCU franchise.
But if Marvel doesn't have the courage for that (and I'm not sure I would criticise them...
Previous incarnations of Hulk were mo-cap too. They looked nothing like Banner. Ruffalo resemblance was intentional
Reminder that we aren't talking about comics Kang. We have no idea what MCU Kang is or is not capable of.
That's not a personality, that's a caricature. Doom is those things too, but we have some insight into why he is those things. I'm not aware of any such depth to Kang.
Although I doubt this will be a Lou Ferigno type of appearance per episode, its kind of a funny thing about actors. They actually want to appear in things they act in. Oddly enough, that aligns...
in the comics there is little resemblance between Banner and Hulk but they look nearly identical in the MCU
It's the most obvious climax to bringing the FF and X-Men into the MCU.
Although I'm at a total loss to understand how that relates to the death of Captain Marvel.
"I Want It All" by Queen is particularly effective.
Chevy Chase Steve Martin Martin Short Eddie Murphy Dan Ackroyd John Belushi Jim Belushi prolly more along these lines
I really wish this thread was talking about the movie instead of speculating on these stupid accusations. Even ranting on the movie would be an improvement.