Search:

Folks this weekend is the NFL Draft. Tony Khan is doing this for the publicity angle. NFL.com is already reporting it:
...

OK sure. But so what? Is that *really* enough of a reason for nearly every single wrestling talking head to melt down like they are?

110% agreed. But people are acting like he pooped on a woman's head or something.

Long dead? Wasn't the Punk interview just a week ago? Everyone keeps saying the same thing, that it's AEW alone that keeps bringing all this back up.

Me watching Dynamite last night: "Huh Punk attacked Jack for sure. Seems like he's in the wrong here"

The rest of the internet: "AEW JUST BURIED THEMSELVES! WORST MOVE EVER! TONY DOESN'T KNOW WHAT...

Quoted for truth.

Quoted for truth.

My pet theory is still that they are going to make the "James Bond is a code name" idea a reality. the next movie has the existing M need to create a new type of agent. This new agent type will need...

Steve Koonan is a regular fixture on Atlanta sports radio and I never knew he was on the WWE Board. You want to know who the leak is? My money is on the guy whose nickname is 'Puffy K'.

I'm glad I'm not the only one that thought that. I agree with a lot of pundits who say the Women's division doesn't get enough time but then a match like this happens and I think "I don't want to see...

Sounds like the whole thing was scripted:

https://whatculture.com/wwe/why-cody-rhodes-used-banned-words-on-last-nights-wwe-raw

Per Dave Meltzer on the latest Wrestling Observer Radio, this...

Having Cody go over Reigns would imply that AEW's talent is equal to, or superior than, WWE's. Vince would never in a million years let that happen. Cody has years of getting buried in his future.

This feels like Cody was trying to use the WWE as a negotiating tool for a new contract. The old "You're offering me this but they are offering me more" tactic. However Tony Khan decided to call his...

Think about this too....which characters would have been the most problematic with the code name Bond scenario going forward? His best friend? His evil step brother? Good thing they are conveniently...

Well I wouldn't exactly say 'established' looks. Bond has been black haired, brunette, blond, 30's, 40's 50's 60's, hairy chested, smooth chested, etc. And not 100% 'established' characteristics...

It is now yes. But the premise of the next movie would be to establish the creation 'James Bond' as a codename to honor Craig's character by his supporting cast. i can just imagine the final scene of...

If they do it poorly, absolutely. I just have a feeling that's how they will handle the next movie.

It would let them go a bit Dr. Who going forward, where each new 'Bond' brings enough of their own characteristics to make it believable. In their world they call each other M and Q, Bond wouldn't be...

As a retcon trying to apply it to past movies I agree. But setting it up as the standard going forward might be what they are thinking.

My guess is there will be a need for some kind of non 00 agent and the current cast will get together and decide the new code name for this agent will be James Bond, after their friend who sacrificed...

I'm guessing it has something to do with being able to sacrifice himself. Remember he did get his Worthy-ness back right before he fought the Beyonders in a hopeless fight.

Lois Lane asks Superman if he knows who won the last American Idol or when was the last time he went to a NASCAR race?