Search:

Same, but just from a marketing perspective I would assume he'd go bigger with Spider-Man than just FNSM.

To be fair, X-Men 97 was greenlighted because X-Men TAS killed it on Disney+. It was at one point literally the most watched Disney+ show, so I wouldn't say not doing Spider-Man '98 counts as...

I mean, he had two bad cartoons that no one watched and were forgotten.

Also, making him older and adapting 616 material like X-Men '97 would immediately diatinguish it from the past two cartoons....

Seeing TAS Spidey was great.

I do kinda wonder if Marvel is kicking themselves in the foot for being so far into production with Friendly Neighborhood and not doing Spider-Man '98 or another show...

Both the PR nightmare of Wells' run (see Kamala fiasco) and massive USM are anomalies - enough to potentially catch a higher-up's attention - and I think (thanks to USM) the BND Editors ran out of...

A huge reason USM is selling so well in the first place is because of the marriage. It's impossible to deny this when it was one of the main things it was marketed on from Day 1 (and still is).
...

That's not how investors think.

They're going to want to know why Marvel is leaving money on the table with ASM.

I doubt it was intentional.

I don't think they had much of a plan besides just "Spider-Man isn't married" and "we're going to rehash old stories".

I get that. Personally, I don't entirely buy Jameson being cool with Peter. That was by far the weakest part of Zdarsky's run for me. I think Jameson's reaction in Civil War was more in-line with who...

I liked her interactions with Captain America in JMS' run.

I also liked her putting Wolverine in place, lol.

Lots of characters weren't originally designed to work together, though. The whole DC universe wasn't originally designed to work together.

But they're in the same universe now, and there's (very...

I'm talking about Peter's psychology. I don't think Peter can live in a universe where others took on his mantle and be agnostic/lukewarm/have no opinions on that phenomenon. It's not realistic human...

My point is that I don't think Peter being agnostic on them works.

Addressing OMD and Peter's incompetence is first priority but I think addressing Miles/Spider-Verse is the most important...

IMO, there isn't sufficient evidence to accept something like that yet.

More importantly, I said they don't have to team up often. Just that their existence has to be acknowledged. It has to have...

It needs 4 things that all go together IMO.

1. Undo OMD - The obvious one. Let Peter and his world grow instead of being stuck to the 70s status quo. Also, you kinda need to undo OMD at this point...

The way Gwen and Harry seemed into them, I do think MJ for a moment thought they wanted something more personal...

Peter agrees too.

This has been covered. It's a myth that Ditko disagreed with Peter graduating high school.

Hickman isn't doing (and is never gonna do) the "Get a real job / You must outgrow your fun side and hippie beliefs about changing the world once you have kids" thing with Peter.

IMO, Peter should have a job that feels real and that feels connected to real events.

Both his job at The Bugle and his job as a teacher had that. The rest, not so much.

I think Peter still being a photographer is commentary on the lack of upwards mobility to better-paying jobs for many Millennials. It does seem to be intentional. As is him getting that job in the...

I think eventually they'll have to drop the real month-to-month time.

It's so weird how MCU Spidey doesn't quip much when:

1) Spidey is known for quipping and the MCU is known for staying true to the comics.

2) The MCU is also known for quips in general.

3)...

Same.

I'm fine with his panel time. We are only 3 issues in. That's only half of the first trade volume.

A lot of the "this character hasn't done much" talk I see strikes me as way too...

It's been Daredevil since the 80s.