Search:

Type: Posts; User: numberthirty

Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.08 seconds.

  1. Nothing about that is even remotely shocking.

    Nothing about that is even remotely shocking.
  2. [/B] On what's in blue... While...

    [/B]






    On what's in blue...

    While I'm not still super sharp on exactly how it played out, it seemed like it kind of hitched on exactly what they either acquitted him on or couldn't come...
  3. There's more than one working theory there... ...

    There's more than one working theory there...

    - If you are not up to speed, dude was on Trump's old show...
    - Could lay the groundwork for another person Trump actually wants to cut some slack......
  4. Here's a little "Basics 101" - Actually doing...

    Here's a little "Basics 101" -

    Actually doing anything like the bare minimum in states you lost during the primary is the "Apple" to the "Orange" that would be making some judgement calls based on...
  5. Your preaching to the choir...

    Your preaching to the choir...
  6. To start with, you've got to be straight with...

    To start with, you've got to be straight with yourself about what a "Liberal..." in America even is. Which is "On The Left Edge Of What Is Actually 'The Right'..."

    It's been that way for decades...
  7. One quick "Credit Where It Is Due..." nod - At...

    One quick "Credit Where It Is Due..." nod -

    At least Elizabeth Warren gets that it needs to be Medicare For All to even have a chance to be anything except a tire fire that America just keeps on...
  8. Except for me talking about a couple of folks in...

    Except for me talking about a couple of folks in the running, I'm pretty sure Bloomberg is the only instance in the thread where someone said "I Would Probably Just Not Vote..."

    Edit:

    Make that...
  9. Jeez... Yeah. Every single time I hear...

    Jeez...

    Yeah.

    Every single time I hear "Medicare For All Who Want It...", I just want someone to ask if Mayor Pete will commit to bankrupting himself helping all of the people that "Medicare...
  10. There is no version of things where putting right...

    There is no version of things where putting right around "No..." focus into states that you lost during the primary is party of a strategy that is not "Horrible Losing". There is no version of thing...
  11. One more reason not to support him...

    One more reason not to support him...
  12. "Apple"/"Orange" When she was going up against...

    "Apple"/"Orange"

    When she was going up against Sanders was she coming out of Congress?

    If the answer there is "No...", it's not a particularly apt comparison.

    What it actually was amounts to...
  13. Or... She was "Who's Next?..." Which she...

    Or...

    She was "Who's Next?..."

    Which she was. Never mind that Democrats regularly nominate the "Who's Next?..." option.
  14. Which takes place after a nomination process...

    Which takes place after a nomination process where they have regularly weeded out likely more popular options.
  15. No. For the same reason as Sanders. Each of...

    No.

    For the same reason as Sanders.

    Each of the big two will usually make the "Who's Next?..."/"Seemingly Safe Bet..." call in their nomination process.
  16. Not if the popular vote is driven by a party who...

    Not if the popular vote is driven by a party who usually make the "Who's Next?..."/"Safe Bet..." call.

    Which Democrats regularly do.

    Again, not complicated.
  17. No one said any of that. You asked how a more...

    No one said any of that.

    You asked how a more popular candidate could lose during the nomination process. It's easy.

    "Seemingly Sensible..." Vs. "Actual Popularity..."

    Not that complicated....
  18. No, not really. Democrats are fond of...

    No, not really.

    Democrats are fond of nominating "Who's Next?..."/"We Believe This Is A Safe Bet..." choices.

    Never mind that there were only to viable options. It ain't hard to run the...
  19. Ditto. ..........

    Ditto.

    ..........
  20. On Bloomberg, I'd disagree. There is a clearly...

    On Bloomberg, I'd disagree.

    There is a clearly realistic scenario where that winds up at "Please Vote For The Least 'Complete Garbage..." Option..." Ignoring the issue with viability when it comes...
  21. You are making it more complicated than it is. ...

    You are making it more complicated than it is.

    Democratic primary voters have picked "The Person Who Is Next..." more than once.

    Actual viability in a General has been, at best, a secondary...
  22. For starters... Not just taking Wisconsin and...

    For starters...

    Not just taking Wisconsin and Michigan for granted.

    That's already a far better plan.
  23. Who have selected losing nominees more than once.

    Who have selected losing nominees more than once.
  24. ..........

    ..........
  25. There's a whole story there... ...

    There's a whole story there...

    https://www.bustle.com/p/the-big-problem-with-using-nevertheless-she-persisted-as-a-feminist-rallying-cry-36631
Results 1 to 25 of 500
Page 1 of 20 1 2 3 4