Search:

indestructible hulk 4.

Good, but away by the greatest. That's how people know Pad's, "by the greatest".

These three writers Paul Jenkins, Bruce Jones and Gerry Duggan) is enough to break a Peter David's idolatry.
...

Pad's did nothing but direct Grey Hulk to another perspective. All that clap about Peter David is a lie, and nobody want to see the true of the story. Nobody want to writer the Hulk's book anymore!...

Mantlo do a unique run, nobody do this after him. He just put the Hulk in a respect position. Peter David do nothing but writer a Grey Hulk from another perspective, but Stan Lee do this first, fact.

Greg Pak who KILL a important character created by Mantlo, that guy lost his respect, and the same writer who responsible to Amadeus "sucks' Cho. A guy who writer a 635 issues of family's hulk...

Never care about PAD'S, like how i never care about Maestro. They try and try another times to bring this character back, and not work.

Talk to me about Bill Mantlo/Sal Buscema, the rest let's...

By Angel Medina art? You're serious? This is crap.

No, is not.

I care about good stories, not battles.

Ross was cured, and now maybe he come back from the beginning. Betty was cured, maybe she come back in this run, too.

Rick Jones appear on Secret Empire (another boring event), Samson appear in...

Thanks to Deodato Jr. for i keep more away from this run, the art is pretty bad.

I never care about Heroes Rebon, but if i remember, this long hair Hulk born if a new origin from the another universe. Both events (Onslaugh/Reborn) is from 1996/1997. And in the Hulk's title he...

Post-Oslaught.

I quit to follow Pad's since fall of the Pantheon, i don't care about this green door either;)

But i have these issues.

Hope Devil Hulk's appear in this green door! Even Greg Pak leave this incarnation to take another runs. And if appear, do the same (or better) than Jenkin's run.

Well, here we go again for one more review about immortal hulk series:

ISSUE #4.

When you read all of Hulk's story in your whole life, you start to understand how this character work.

1-...

I don't need to read your last post to see how bizarre that mistake is, if you want to justify, fine. But i don't care about the wiki. LED TV in the 60's there's no how to justify. Because of that...

And i ask to you: why they don't show to new generation a tv from 60's or how the people watching the news? This is so much simple.

I really hope than this book will be good, i want to forget this...

The writer do a big (bizarre) mistake, and there is no how to justify. If you think this is funny, good for you, but not for me. I not laughing. This run starts with serious plot, and now this...

Cool and nothing more than that.

Pretty good, but i don't see Hulk like a agent of shield, sorry. But this run is pretty solid, even with Kim Jacinto's art.

Start good, in fact, the three first...

Not so nice about this run.

When i was a kid start to become when a was a fake in these days.

Don't care about Mc Farlane's run, read one time and goodbye.

To your own ambitions.

Hope than non sense page from 1966 not ruined this book.

Thank you, finally i can see the preview.

And, i going crazy or Ewing go crazy? LED TV in 1966? (Tales to Astonish #77 Hulk's identity revealed) I start to kind worried about this writer.

Cannot open.