Agree, but, of course, never likely to happen because individual countries see the advantage of having incredibly rich individuals and companies based in their manor, and seek to attract them by...
Type: Posts; User: JackDaw
Agree, but, of course, never likely to happen because individual countries see the advantage of having incredibly rich individuals and companies based in their manor, and seek to attract them by...
Interesting video.
Mark Fuhrman was a real piece of work.
See after the trial he retired, got full pension, made a lot of money writing books, tv appearances. That should cause anybody who...
I guess whatever the result of the Trump trial, he will play the victim at the end of it.
If found guilty, the theme will be “Americas champion laid low by a crooked judge and biased jury. Vote...
Yes, I did mean “allow for the fact that views change”.
I’ll say a bit more about search function later. But before that let me admit to a “gut feeling”. It’s this: if I asked some one for their...
No, my post was self evidently completely about the search facility on these boards, and you made a completely irrelevant reply that had nothing to do whatsoever to do with what I’d actually written....
But why did you feel the need to quote my post about the search engine when your comments had nothing to do with my post?
But you completely ignored my actual post and talked about a completely different issue, and have just done exactly the same.
It must be beyond obvious that I don’t support the Republican Party,...
What’s that got to do with the search facility here having severe limitations?
Yes..agree.. the search facility here has severe limits. Not that unusual, it’s true on many sites.
In addition…if you were seeking some one views on something…you’d have to allow for fact, that...
Joking aside, poor sod, was obviously mentally tormented, whatever set of beliefs led to this sad act.
That’s one less vote for the Donald. Unless votes by Ouija board are allowed in US?
You put "Parents have no rights, only responsibilities".
What was it actually supposed to mean? If it actually meant something like "some parents try to control their children too much, etc", ...
Completely misleading. We both know that, but I can see you're just not going to admit that.
I'm not trying to pick a fight.
I am trying to understand your true position. If your original statement was just worded in a very misleading way, it that difficult for you to admit?
No. When have I said anything that could be sensibly interpreted that way??
I believe parents have rights, clearly established by law, and there is no mainstream appetite in either the Democratic...
But your original statement was a simple “parents have no rights, only responsibilities”.
Are you sticking to that? Or was it just a misleading way of expressing your views.?
Pragmatically, I don’t think the parents can directly decide their children’s religion. I was baptised, for example, but decided long ago I’m not a Christian. The right the parents have is not that:...
Factually there’s a lot of established law in US that parents do have rights. If you doubt that, you can always check via Google.
I won’t define it in strict legal terms (I probably couldn’t even...
Wow. Do you really not realise how extremist that view is?
Really??
I can see why it might be an amber warning…but surely not a red flag, unless you believe parents have no rights, and it’s never appropriate to ever refer to them.
I live in UK.
A couple of years ago, realising I’d never read any John Buchan books, though he’d written some famous ones such as “The 39 Steps”, decided to try a couple…
So down to nearest...
I wonder what other country than Israel could have a couple of thousand assorted high explosive projectiles aimed at them, and be expected to not regard it as an effective declaration of war.
Yes. That’s maybe the most amazing thing (with strong contenders): just how transparent the act is.
I think of him essentially as a con man, and have from time to time tried to compare him with...
I know all the reasons the Republicans ended up with Trump…”fanatical supporters”, “he gives licence to hate”, etc, etc.
But, blimey it’s strange that it can come to him being their Presidential...
I suspect we are probably in close agreement in reality then…because I agree it could be true. We’d only be debating the probabilities of whether it’s true or false.
Incidentally Iran’s assurance...