Yes, partially, because that is Superman. A big part of it was that he seemed in better spirits, focused on saving people before punching the big bad, and overall seemed to be someone who inspired confidence. Superman's here! We're going to be okay! My audience cheered and applauded when he announced his presence in the climax of the movie, which was the only time they did so before the credits. The wonderful WW scene, Supes v JL fight, nothing else elicited such a response and those are generally agreed to be some of the more entertaining moments.
Moreover, Superman is a lot like us, but he's not us. He's what we could be if we really tried. He doesn't stumble where we do, but he helps us up and makes sure we can keep moving forward. Snyder was trying so hard to dig into the drama of his tragedy that he forgot the whimsy and triumph of the character. He doesn't brood because he's different. He makes it an advantage and finds a way to do the right thing. He has the most interesting, adventurous life that ever will be and he's overall a cheerful character. Zack made him a broody teen who nobody "gets" because the weight of the world is on his shoulders and, unlike Superman, he buckles and questions himself. Henry does his best in every movie with the material he's given, but he finally got to play the character this time. The Superman in Justice League is pretty much the best we've had since Reeve while not actually doing a riff on the guy. It's a great portrayal for a modern generation. He's heroic, has some humor to him, and seems to live an adventurous life. He's that older brother or uncle you really hope you can be as cool as one day; a genuinely inspiring hero.
Furthermore, I'd argue that Superman or any of these characters need the rest of the JL to be who they are. They have their origin stories for that. Bruce needs his parents to get shot. Clark needs Krypton to blow, his parents to love him and send him to two more loving parents who inspire him. Diana needs to be raised by the Amazons and realize man's world needs saving. These are what make them Batman, Superman and Wonder Woman. They'd be those characters with or without a Justice League.
I'd also argue the JL aren't a bunch of freaks. For the most part, DC's characters are well-put together mentally and emotionally, even those with some darker pasts. The only real freak of the bunch is Barry, too, as everyone else's gifts are natural to them (Clark, Diana, Arthur, J'onn) or tech/tools (Hal and Bruce). Barry was the one guy who got hit by lightning and chemicals. In film's League, there's just Barry and Victor. Everyone else is still fundamentally normal unless you just want to call anyone extranormal a freak.
People are saying this movie got the tone right because, at the end of the day, DC characters shine best when they're a bit less dour. Snyder missed the point every time because he wanted to go toward DKR and Watchmen. It's what he loves. It's not really what DC is about, though, so it's just a very abstract take on the concepts and Superman is so antithetical to everything that entails.
To answer the primary thread, I had fun in the movie but it's objectively so uneven I can't really give it a pass. That said, at moments I was so genuinely overcome with joy I laughed out loud. I even cheered at the first post-credit stinger. Didn't love Barry, but Aquaman was fun to watch even if it's a vastly divergent take. It's definitely a course correction tonally. The horrendous plot be damned, if I just watched a bunch of clips on YouTube, I'd genuinely have a blast. Some moments really are wonderful for DC fans.
|