I think many are confused about the 'Marvel method'.
If you were to get a copy of 'How to Draw Comics the Marvel Way', which is still a popular shelf staple for comics artists, you'd see that the writer is still 'in control'.
The artist isn't 'writing the comic'.
Here's an example. It's #4 on the list.
To my knowledge, all the Giffen and DeMatteis JLI issues were done in this format.
And it turned out great.
Giffen would do the plotting, then the artists would do the art, and then DeMatteis would add the script.
It helped make the action move faster because the artist develops the art based on the 'beats' of the plot and also it helped the script writer put in dialogue that more easily matched the facial expressions.
Kingdom Come and Marvels were also created in the Marvel Method.
The writer essentially becomes something like a movie director, directing the artist, who is more like a cameraman, in easy to understand paragraphs, then the writer comes back and adds the dialogue.
It also leaves room for things like the artist being more in control of panel layouts (something artists like J. H. Williams III would love because they'd able to do all their little design layouts).
As long as the pages, and any specific panels listed, include the information and story beats requested, the writer lets the artist have more freedom.
Granted, some artists may not be good for this style, as a few may get in a rut of doing just stock poses without some kind of guidance. Especially if they were used to being told exactly what to draw in every panel.