Inspired purely by the fact that I'm watching the movie again.
Overall, I enjoy The Dark Knight, but it's difficult sometimes.
On the good side, there are little nuances that many people miss even after several viewings, that really add character to the film.
- Batman not realizing Harvey is using a two-headed coin when apparently brutally threatening Joker's henchman after the apparent death of Gordon, only to discover the coin after he saves Harvey from death.
- Alfred's story of a Burmese criminal with the tagline of "some people just want to watch the world burn" only to reveal later they only caught the guy by burning down the forest
- Joker excaping the MCU in a police car with his head out the window reveling in the wind like a dog, and later revealing he's "like a dog chasing cars."
There is almost nothing about this script that is there by coincidence. So many subtle nuances - it's an incredibly advanced piece of writing.
But balanced against that is the horrible direction, and particularly the editing. The chase scene where Joker is going after Harvey in the police convoy is one of the most difficult to follow in cinematic action movie history. There are very basic flaws throughout the film involving point of view, sequencing, camera angle.
But there are brilliant performances by people like Heath Ledger, who brings a terrifying creature to uncomfortable life while being genuinely funny (see the Joker leaving the hospital, or the disappearing pencil), and Michael Caine turning in a subtle meaningful performance without being a nagging conscience as Alfred. But then there is the wooden, uninspired performance of Bale, who seems to go through motions unless he's delivering a one-liner ("i'm gonna tell them it was your idea!")
But it was a landmark film in the superhero genre, influencing so many other films to follow - most importantly, and ironically, the Marvel films.
Anyone else have such conflicting views on this movie?