Originally Posted by
vitruvian
Why the heck would he do that? Okay, villains, perhaps, to the extent that it didn't conflict with the mission statement of defending the planet against outside threats, but heroes? If you make, say, the FF disappear, the planet gets eaten by Galactus. You make Dr. Strange disappear, and Dormammu or Nightmare conquer our dimension. Being able to do it all themselves has never been the case with either the Man on the Wall or T'Challa himself; even before the modern age of heroes, even before S.H.I.E.L.D. the chartered organization, there was the whole Shield organization going back to Galileo and DaVinci and Newton also defending the Earth, there were the previous Sorceror Supremes, there have been all kinds of other defenders.
No, the super heroes play a role we ARE aware of. They save the world on a regular basis from stuff that got past the Man on the Wall.
That's an interesting thought, but there are enough different threats out there that the extra practice probably isn't necessary. On the other hand, with many villains like Doom and Zemo and so on, whether they take over the world or not, they have a vested interest in the world continuing to exist, so they actually potentially serve as part of Earth's defense system as well. Remember, Doom was instrumental in protecting MU Earth from the Mad Celestials.
How would BP have done that? He's been an Avenger about as long as Ultron has existed, and it's not like the Avengers haven't been trying to stop him every time he popped up. When they haven't been looking for him, it's been because they had no idea part of his programming survived anywhere, and when they have known that, I wouldn't assume they've been sitting on their thumbs rather than looking for his backups. And Age of Ultron appears to have finally happened when Ultron popped to a future era where the Avengers couldn't do anything about him further developing himself, after a sojourn in outer space where he almost took over the universe with the Phalanx... it's difficult to see how the Avengers, or BP alone, could have done much about that. And even in terms of BP being more proactive and looking into these things on his own even if the Avengers as a whole aren't on the ball - why would he need to be Fury's successor as the Man on the Wall in order to do that, when Ultron has always been as big a threat to Wakanda as to the rest of the world? And yes there has been a lot of accommodation over the centuries between various agents around the world.
You seem to keep forgetting that Wakanda IS ON EARTH. There's no conflict between protecting one and protecting the other.
As to political infighting and conflict between people on Earth, the only time I can see this being an issue is if/when Wakanda is actually at war. At other times, while T'Challa would have to continue looking out for Wakanda's interests, that's hardly more difficult than Fury continuing to go after AIM and HYDRA as Director of SHIELD for most of his work week, only moonlighting as TMoTW on Fridays for the most part. If Fury had truly been without politics from the point of taking that role one, he hardly would have been continuing to go after Nazi-founded terrorist organizations or the Yellow Claw for most of his time.
Given the number of things that evidently got past Fury, or that he chose to let the heroes handle in their own way, it's not at all clear that his wetworks methods are actually more effective than simply looking at all threats without exception and throwing all the available resources at stopping or containing them, or that he's really been necessary.