View Poll Results: Are You Excited for a New Professor X Book?

Voters
49. You may not vote on this poll
  • Yes, very excited to see what Charles Soule has in the works

    15 30.61%
  • No (Please Explain)

    34 69.39%
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 66
  1. #16
    Extraordinary Member AcesX1X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    8,702

    Default

    my theory:

    i think he'll stay in the fantomez body until they get tired of it. then professor will hunt down masque and force him/her to transform his face into the one we know and love.

  2. #17
    Astonishing Member DragonsChi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Posts
    2,990

    Default

    I hope its a Professor X solo by Soule. That is a book I would by multiple copies of.
    Idea's Open Discussion And Growth. Silencing Idea's Confirms Them To Be True In The Minds Of Those Who Hold Them. The Attempt Of Eliminating Idea's Proves You To Be A Fool.

  3. #18
    Ultimate Member Tycon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    12,734

    Default

    It's all but confirmed that Astonishing is being relaunched into New X-Men (Morrison's,not KYost's sadly).

  4. #19
    EMMA WAS RIGHT! darkalamator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    2,359

    Default

    No Charles Soule please. Many thanks.
    Primum vivere deindre philosophare

  5. #20

    Default

    X daddy solo? it's garbage idea.
    how many times has this manipulator fake died and came back. I didn't think the X-books could get any worse, but Marvel seems dead set on lowering my expectations even further, yet again.
    05 brats, x daddy, fish, wolverine clones. They all bring down whatever book they're in and are boring and annoy me.
    Rant
    Jean really is the worst character in Marvel, isn't she?
    Scemma forever Triangle never.
    Scott needs an alpha female like Bettsy.
    What woman wouldn't be attracted to Scott? He's 100% alpha male who tells the Avengers to go f*#& themselves.
    I want cyclops back free from any ginger women to be his own man.
    Logically..
    TeenClops should have lusted for Emma & Cuckoos. Especially Stepford Cuckoos! They're teenage triplet clones of his hottest ex, how could he not be?
    End of rant

  6. #21
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    6,666

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ţh€ €жţяą-๏яďɨɲąя¥ Tycon View Post
    It's all but confirmed that Astonishing is being relaunched into New X-Men (Morrison's,not KYost's sadly).
    Based on what?

  7. #22

    Default

    I don't know if there is a market appeal for Prof X in Fantomex's body but i can understand the creative appeal.

    So i could see them just doing it till it rounds out of interest like a previous poster said.

  8. #23
    Ultimate Member Tycon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    12,734

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maestroneto View Post
    Based on what?
    https://twitter.com/MarkPaniccia/sta...97367819919362

    https://twitter.com/MarkPaniccia/sta...76294403981313

    But there's also speculation that Prof Mex is actually going to be leading the young New X-Men with Psylocke, Bishop, Rogue

  9. #24
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    6,666

    Default

    It better be written by Rosenberg.

  10. #25
    Astonishing Member Ulfhammer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    3,246

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AcesX1X View Post
    no one is "sure" of anything - this is soule's announcement and he's being a bit secretive.

    i'm using the method of logical induction to make an assumption as to what he is talking about. if you have another theory, we'd be happy to hear it.

    my proofs:

    1. soule just finished astonishing x-men run
    2. soule just brought back professor x
    3. soule brought "existing character" professor x back in "a fresh way"
    4. soule has not yet had a chance to expand on this new introduction
    5. soule just announced a new book for "an existing character -- in a fresh way"

    what proofs do you have to assume it would be cyclop or wolverine?
    That's not proof, just elegant supposition. As you said no one is "sure" about anything therefore no proofs will be forthcoming.

    As for your list, writers don't always work on the same characters between books, and Wolverine and Cyclops are "existing" characters. Being alive or dead in current continuity doesn't prevent them from existing. To me the opposite of existing would be a new character, not a dead character. As for Charlie walking around in a borrowed superhero body... I'll pass. The most interesting thing about him was his idealogical stand and serving as a counter to Magneto and a mentor to the students back in the day. These roles are all adequately filled by existing x-men. I'm not sure what the draw would be at this point. Are there people clamoring to have him back, and like this?

  11. #26
    Pro Mutant Anarchist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    4,683

    Default

    Charles Soule should stay as FAR away from ANYTHING X-Men related as possible.
    That guy is such a hack.

  12. #27
    BANNED spirit2011's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2016
    Posts
    11,824

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ţh€ €жţяą-๏яďɨɲąя¥ Tycon View Post
    https://twitter.com/MarkPaniccia/sta...97367819919362

    https://twitter.com/MarkPaniccia/sta...76294403981313

    But there's also speculation that Prof Mex is actually going to be leading the young New X-Men with Psylocke, Bishop, Rogue
    T"rying to take an existing character and let them be seen in a fresh way."

    them. I think it may be this new x-men book with professor charlex

    I'm pretty sure it isn't Cyclops and also no Wolverine

  13. #28
    Extraordinary Member AcesX1X's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    8,702

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ulfhammer View Post
    That's not proof, just elegant supposition. As you said no one is "sure" about anything therefore no proofs will be forthcoming.

    As for your list, writers don't always work on the same characters between books, and Wolverine and Cyclops are "existing" characters. Being alive or dead in current continuity doesn't prevent them from existing. To me the opposite of existing would be a new character, not a dead character. As for Charlie walking around in a borrowed superhero body... I'll pass. The most interesting thing about him was his idealogical stand and serving as a counter to Magneto and a mentor to the students back in the day. These roles are all adequately filled by existing x-men. I'm not sure what the draw would be at this point. Are there people clamoring to have him back, and like this?
    speculation based on evidence

    i am open to your ideas if you can support your theory with evidence.

    cyclop or wolverine are baseless speculation thus far

  14. #29
    Extraordinary Member Divine Spark's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    5,891

    Default

    No. I honestly wish he stayed dead.

  15. #30
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    6,861

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AcesX1X View Post
    no one is "sure" of anything - this is soule's announcement and he's being a bit secretive.

    i'm using the method of logical induction to make an assumption as to what he is talking about. if you have another theory, we'd be happy to hear it.

    my proofs:

    1. soule just finished astonishing x-men run
    2. soule just brought back professor x
    3. soule brought "existing character" professor x back in "a fresh way"
    4. soule has not yet had a chance to expand on this new introduction
    5. soule just announced a new book for "an existing character -- in a fresh way"

    what proofs do you have to assume it would be cyclop or wolverine?
    1. Soule killed both Wolverine and Cyclops.
    2. Wolverine just came back. Maybe Cyclops next?
    3. That is actually an argument against, as by the time the secret project comes out, it won't be a fresh idea.
    4. He has 6 more issues.
    5. That is just repeating the statement, not evidence.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •