I think a fundamental problem with the character was his concept to start with. He's a thief. Part of the associated occupational hazard is also being a liar. Both these things tend to land him pretty solidly in the creep category, which is reinforced by not accepting Rogue's rejection.
If he's given a makeover, philosophically speaking, I'm not sure he'd be Gambit any longer, would he? I'm really curious about this. Other characters have had an aspect revamped or tweaked, to make them more acceptable -- Wolverine's policy on killing, for example -- but I can't recall where the whole concept of what motivates them has been scrapped in favor of something else.
The fun Gambit of old before all the angst was charming and had his own little mysteries. They devolved those mysteries into Belladonna and a Sinister past. So what he needs to progress has always been easy to see...turn him into a full villain. He should of stayed with Sinister back in 07 in Messiah Complex. Would of been much more interesting than what he is today..I remember he was damn near shaking in his boots in front of Miss Sinister in X 23's book while Laura didn't want to back down. Whst kind of hero is that? Lol.
I think that if Rogue and Deadpool had loger relationship... They would clash about this problem sooner or later.
I didn't.You seem confused. The poster was talking about how Gambit was a thief to imply Rogue can't trust him.
I wrote that Gambit had secrets and that he was suffering because of them. That was main part of trust.
Being a thief... Especially leader of thief guild... They weren't together because of this reason for some time... right?
Did You forget this?
She has hopes that anyone can be better.It is fair game to point out how she holds thieves to a higher standard than murderers.
I am pretty sure that Deadpool wouldn't be able to live with her for long without making some stupid mistakes(look at SE for example).
both are wrongMy response which is entirely fair given the above is why is she concerned about Gambit being a thief but not Mags and Deadpool being murderers.
in both situations Rogue should give them chance, because she believes that people can change
in both situations they will still kill people or steal stuff and relationship will end
Rogue can forgive him any number of times but it won't change anything. Gambit will still be a Gambit and they will break up.
She had different memories then... Do You think that wirters should ignore her powers?
Issue 1
That was good and solid. Good start.
This is basically a humorous like couples/relationship type comic. Perhaps there will also be superheroing as well.
I agree about it feeling very retro/nostalgic like it's trying to "reset" the whole Gambit/Rogue situation or something. We will find out more what the book's endgame is I guess.
Forget the old ways - Krakoa is god.
OBEY
If I where to try to create an answer it would probably be that she cares more for Gambit and therefore holds him to a higher standard and opens up more to him then others. For a girl with a lot of issues on trusting, intimacy and opening up that probably scares her more then any apocalypse, sinister or brood fight.
The real answer is more probably changing writers and editorial staff at Marvel.
I think you hit the nail on the head with your point about Rogue having all the agency and Gambit being her satellite, and all the character and narrative problems that follow.
It really should have been clear that this would be the case right from the start based on the title of the comic - Rogue and Gambit. Just as in Avengers vs X-Men, where the group that is named first, Avengers, were the heroes and the X-Men the villains, and Inhumans vs X-Men where the Inhumans were the ones Marvel was trying to portray sympathetically and the X-Men were once more the villains, putting Rogue before Gambit in the title should tell readers that Rogue is the actual protagonist with Gambit as her satellite.
Has Kelly Thompson's body of work consisted mainly of female protagonists?
Also, is the series having the same artist for all the issues, or will the artists be playing musical chairs?
Your analogies are faulty, and you assume premises without offering sufficient evidence. As a reader of Rogue, I feel confident that she has forgiven him for a lot of things, maybe even everything. I don't think she is still mad. But she can forgive him and still believe a relationship isn't good for them. She always speaks positively about gambit and refers to him as one of her best friends. But by no means does that mean she has any obligation to be in a relationship with him. And your comparisons with DP AND mags are flawed.
DP: was NEVER in a relationship with him. Does not need to believe he is a wonderful person to be on a team with or learn to trust him. Both he and mags were at the tail end of redemption arcs, where they were atoning for past mistakes. But Gambit....NOT REFORMED. Proudly continues thieving and living a life which Rogue would reasonably feel is inconsistent with what she wants.
And when you say she should forgive a person who she has a deep and complicated past with, before she is morally allowed (I know that wasn't your exact wording, but I feel adequately summarizes your stance) to be with other guys, than you are kinda policing her.
Also, I am quite surprised y'all think she is being treated as a saint. One of the most poignant moments in the book, to me, is when he says the lone about having to carry all of the weight of their history. THAT is not only an excellent criticism of Rogue, but is one I can honor as a Rogue fan which genuinely makes me sympathize with Gambit. KC is legit the first writer to make me sympathize with him in a very, very long time. And also, you talk about hypocrisy? You know good and well Gambit is with girls left and right, and you would probably respect this as shallow relationships...he doesn't need to know or consider the character of the girls he gets with. Why should rogue?
Only when she gets in a serious relationship with an ONGOING criminal who is not reformed (Or at least portrayed so by writers as mags and DP were) and who is as untrustworthy as Gambit can you call her a hypocrite with any chance of validity.
Oh, and Rogue DID have a problem with DP's past, even asking cap to take him off the team. So...
Sorry, but I keep remembering new things...ALSO during AXIS, Rogue ended things completely with Magneto and communicated disgust and betrayal from his actions when he killed red skull. So yeah...she held him to a high standard as well...so not hypocritical. If there was a time when she was woth mags and he was actively murdering not itself defense or defense of another, then it has been half a decade, and she has had a lot of character moments to grow. I don't think she would be in a relationship with anyone who was an intentional, active, not reformed criminal.
Last edited by NicoElFreako; 01-04-2018 at 03:23 AM.
I agree with all the positive reviews for this book. A lot of fun and hilarious.
Too bad it's not an ongoing, or even a 12-issue series at least.
The AoX memories weren't brought up once after the two entered into a romantic relationship. They are completely irrelevant, imo. Had Rogue just had a one night stand with Mags and used the memories as an excuse then you can continue to use them as an argument, but that didn't happen.
Also what do you mean about ignoring her powers? She had her powers under control for a while before she chose Magneto over Gambit and after breaking up with Magneto she still didn't want to be with Gambit while her powers were still in control. Which was all after telling him in Legacy that once her powers were dealt with the two could be together. Gambit stayed with Rogue on her Legacy team the whole time she was dating Magento too. Marvel not doing more with Rogue when she had control of her powers was a huge let down and them just putting her back into her old and tried role of being concerned about them again is a disappointment and regression I feel like.
I'm sorry, but in Legacy when Gambit was on Rogue's team he was fully reformed. He wasn't a criminal. I don't think you can use that as an excuse. He was her longest standing team member and stood by her despite everything. He risked everything for her in MC, he stood by her in AoX, he stood by her in Schism, he stood by her when she chose Magneto over him, he stood by her when she left to go join the Jean Grey School with Wolverine, and he also stood by her when she broke up with Magneto before she left to go be an Avenger. I just don't understand how people can bring up trust issues after they went through all that. He also only went to be a thief again once Rogue left the X-Men to go join the Avengers. After she left Gambit had no real motivation to be with the X-Men anymore and went back to doing his own thing again since he couldn't follow her to the Avengers.
She can not like him being a thief because she worries about him but I don't think trust should be an issue between the two anymore because neither has anything to hide, especially if she is willing to trust Magneto after what he has done too. It just doesn't make sense to me for people to keep falling back on that after they went through everything they went through. I understand Rogue not wanting to be with Gambit romantically, her moving on to Magneto, Johnny Storm, and Deadpool if Duggan had it his way, is fine by me and makes sense. Gambit needs to do the same and move on as well, but I don't think trust should be a big issue between them anymore.
I like both Rogue and Gambit but I don’t like them together because that ship sailed long ago and was resolved.
This issue just made Gambit’s character even weaker. I really just wish he would move on. Again!