I never did, that was absolutely you and only you. If you imply something like that again, you better show me the quote.
You act like she's some glass statuette whose decisions have no merit, an eternal victim so to say, when she's proven herself a smart, capable, and headstrong woman in every respect. She forgave Hank a long time ago, despite Hank never forgiving himself, and she's accepted him back into her life multiple times. Condemning Hank is condemning her forgiveness. You might as well call her a poor battered housewife while you're at it.
Once again, for the Nth time, you prove that you have either an unwillingness or an incapability to divine Shooter's clearly-presented intent in the story. All you do is say "Look! Here's panels of Hank abusing his wife in this one infamous story while he was in the midst of a severe mental breakdown!". Except you forget to mention he was going through a borderline schizophrenic episode. Every time. Do you understand the concept of a psychotic episode? Do you honestly believe that someone cursed with a serious mental ailment should be persecuted to the fullest extent for an isolated incident brought about by the disability that they have zero control over, and in Hank's case no real awareness of?
Oh and those women he's been with since, has he ever shown any signs of physical aggression or abuse towards them? No, he hasn't. Because he had come to recognize his own problems, and was able to remedy the most severe aspects of his disease through self-medication, though he still clearly suffers from manic depression.
Your statements speak to a complete failure to understand the situation in any real manner beyond personal grievance. Honestly I feel like anything I say is a complete waste of time. At not point do you ever show a willingness to actually engage in real conversation or address others' arguments in any acceptable capacity. You stonewall yourself inside your own narrow-minded worldview and repeat the same things ad nauseum, despite those points being addressed, not only by myself and others, but thousands of times over by thousands of fans for many years. It's willful ignorance, no two ways about it.
http://jimshooter.com/2011/03/hank-p...e-beater.html/
There ya go. Straight from the horse's mouth. You either believe him or you think he's a liar. Doesn't matter to me, what happened happened and he ran with it, but I think it goes to show that he did not originally set out to stain the history of Hank Pym forever.