The difference is that he was given power over those ideas. If he didn't come up with them he certainly was allowed to execute them the way he wanted. He never had such luxury with SM/WW.
Circumstances drastically changed for Tomasi, Bendis taking over Superman on the other hand is no different whatsoever from him taking over Iron Man. Circumstances would have been different for Bendis if he was given a third book set in the past or another continuity. Right now I see no change in his mo.
Pak is only held up by a small group of New 52 fans.
True indeed but based on BMB's track record speculation has every right to be negative.
Again I'm not seeing this Tomasi comparison:
Tomasi didn't get to write both Superman and Action.
Tomasi didn't get full control over Supergirl.
Tomasi didn't have absolute control over the franchise.
The quality of Bendis's work isn't the problem. I'm not knocking on Bendis because he wrote garbage and therefore must always produce garbage . The issue here is that if I dont like his work I'll simply drop it. The problem is that I wont just be dropping Bendis, I'll be saying good bye to the entire franchise.