I agree completely that it's a big miss, and it's why my original reaction to this is "it's a pretty great movie, but it's not Reign of the Supermen." It's missing 95% of the original story. Tomasi took the Death of Superman comic and weaved enough of it into the DoS movie so that the film was new and fresh but also familiar to those of us who know the original comics story verbatim. The guys they got to co-write Reign basically looked at the cover of the book and said "those dudes look cool, I can write a story with that." And it does actually work as an animated film with the 4 Supermen...it's just not what we were told was coming. So I'm conflicted...
We've all read the book. It's a pretty meaty story! They could have adapted it all...Eradicator thinking he's Superman, Cyborg destroying Coast City and frying the survivors, fighting Superboy, Engine City...they could have put all of that in this almost 90 minute runtime. But instead, they crafted an original story. And that's where I get extremely irate...we were told they were splitting the story into 2 films so that they could give us a faithful adaptation of the original Death/Return. Faithful. And then images came out, and we discovered it was using New 52 designs and in that quasi-New 52 film continuity. But, while Death of Superman wasn't 100% faithful it DID hit all the right beats and added some new layers. Reign misses that mark completely.
Henshaw is not made of energy, he's a cyborg built by Darkseid. The scene of him tossing Doomsday into space as an escape plan is not in the film (and not being a being of energy inhabiting machinery, I guess it wasn't needed). He's partially brainwashed by Darkseid, but once he breaks free of it he mostly sounds like the Henshaw we know & love. The Eradicator does not believe himself to be Kal-El, and after showing up early on with a mission of "you are a criminal, and thus need to be eradicated!", he kinda disappears for the majority of the film. He's not even sussed about others wearing the shield. Steel was probably my favorite 'good guy' in the film, as he is pretty much his comics counterpart. He does mention his old weapon designs being on the streets, so the film is forgiven for not showing him handling it. Superboy was mostly 90's Superboy, which was fun. The lingo is toned down a ton, but some of it is still there due to Dabney showing him nothing but 90's TV while he was in the tube.
There's no plot to turn Earth into Warworld, no engine city, no Coast City. It's all a plot to bring Darkseid & his army to Earth. It sounds like I hated it, but I didn't...it wasn't what I was expecting, but it's a solid "original" movie. Back when the New 52 started, we all talked about wanting DC to tell us how certain events went down in the new continuity. This would have been a fun update to the original story, a modern retelling, and on the level of "this is how it went down in N52", it works extremely well. But as a "faithful adaptation", it doesn't stick the landing.
So I'm torn. I enjoyed the hell out of it once I started thinking about it in terms of a new telling, but I was still mad about what I was promised. It's a great animated film, and a great sequel to DoS, but it's not "Reign of the Supermen". It's just a great little movie with those characters. |