Is there any reason a lightsaber through the chest would not work?
Is there any reason a lightsaber through the chest would not work?
Sidious-super fast, expert swordsman, can incinerate you with force lightning, can move pretty heavy stuff (yoda lifted troop carriers in the original clone wars cartoons and yoda and him were equal in power), he can create force storms that can destroy entire fleets and teleport people, he has those mind powers also, force illusions, etc etc
How are they not canon lol....the same cartoon series I mentioned showed how grievous got his chest injury. It was released just before the movie in fact, so sorry but it is canon. They've showed him doing similar stuff in the force unlimited video game too correct? Just because marvel released some new trilogy doesn't mean everything is just not canon. Idc what anyone says,mid you do that you get rid of Darth banes rule of two, even if you keep Darth bane, ok whered he get the idea from, it was from Revan, wasn't an original idea. Who was sidious teacher if the books etc are no longer canon, sure plaguis is mentioned in the film but he has his own book.
Don't think the old Clone Wars cartoon was ever considered canon, it certainly isn't in the current Disney canon, neither are the Force Unleashed video games(thank goodness)
If Disney, who own the franchise, say that everything before April 25, 2014 outside the movies and (the then running CGI)clone war series was non canon, then it's non canon, the person that owns the things gets to set the rules for it's canon.Just because marvel released some new trilogy doesn't mean everything is just not canon. Idc what anyone says,mid you do that you get rid of Darth banes rule of two, even if you keep Darth bane, ok whered he get the idea from, it was from Revan, wasn't an original idea. Who was sidious teacher if the books etc are no longer canon, sure plaguis is mentioned in the film but he has his own book.
it was canon for a while since hasbro went to CN to ask for a miniseries to tie in with the release of EP III and CN suggested that genndy do it. but then after how successful it was, they decided to do a whole series about it and kinda sweep it under the rug. so between the release of ROTS and the CGI movie, a argument could made that it was canon for a short time.
but yeah. disney owes SW now and they say it's non-canon, like with a lot of other stuff. (i'm looking at you, force unleashed II)
I wouldn't shed a tear if the Force Unleashed games were retconned from reality to be frank, 2 because the story was so flipping stupid, and 1 because it's the reason we didn't get an actual Kotor 3
I think they were canon but the new stuff messed up the canon as it confused many things. The cartoons were canon, I remember when they came out. Also you gotta remember that in the new cgi cartoons they still have pretty impressive feats, sadly I can only compare what sidious can do to what Vader can do. In the comics and cartoons Vader is shown lifting heavy stuff like those giant walkers, sidious of course is much more powerful then Vader.
Well, if it sorta alleviates the fact that Yoda’s troop carrier feats are non canon....New canon had him held back a mountain.
...Wait, is he actually fighting earthbenders? The hell?
Last edited by Iron_Twister; 02-26-2018 at 07:54 PM.