Originally Posted by
Cyke
Comics in general tend to be a big middle finger to physics, especially the X-Men in general. I'm less concerned about that (I mean, magic users are so prominent, and by definition their powersets are supposed to be giant FUs to physics), and more about how the explanation to Cyclops' powerset seems convoluted in an attempt to make his one-note power seem more interesting.
If you reread my post, I argue that the more convoluted portal-eyes explanation isn't a middle finger to physics (so yes, the simpler explanation is that middle finger instead) moreso than it is someone trying to use their limited knowledge of physics to make Cyclops seem more impressive than he is. Indeed, no writer uses that as integral to Scott, even though there've been several workarounds for his powers (i.e. a psychic barrier that shuts off his powers, or henchmen wrapped in ruby quartz armor, or energy manipulators, or depriving him of solar power, or simply turning off his X-Gene), but never an attempt to go after those portals, because writers just don't care about it. It's not a middle finger to physics -- it's a guy trying to express his love of physics by writing a terrible poem on Valentine's Day.
As it is, you could say the same about Havok and ambient cosmic energy -- all the energy he has is built internally from absorbing the same amount of energy as Cyclops, and yet he's the more powerful of the two. No need for openings to other universes or other extra nonsense. Is it a big middle finger to physics? Sure it is. Is it needlessly complex to make up for some kind of shortcoming? No. He just does it. And that's all he needs.
Sometimes a middle finger to physics is needed in comics. But sometimes trying to create an explanation isn't necessary, either. Star Trek: TOS is harder sci-fi than Voyager, even though Voyager goes through much greater pains to explain the science, because they're too concerned in making imaginary techno-magic than they are about telling sci-fi stories (i.e. the conflict resolution of a story shouldn't come from a technobabble solution, it should be coming from a deep change of the character -- the technobabble solution should be a tool to solve the problem, but not the story itself).
And that's Cyclops. He can do a lot of things, but mostly he just needs to be the guy that shoots stuff.