Hey Guys,
I've been thinking about this for the last couple of days, what are the most contemplative and divisive modern runs in comics; and are their some runs going on now that would qualify.
I thought about this because there is a debate going on in the Robin Rises thread about the true Nature of Darkseid and Morrison's initial intentions in his Batman run.
Which made me go back and read New X-Men, I am currently a quarter done.
Some background, I was a late bloomer with comics, I was into superheroes as a kid but more with trading cards and cartoons. I read some of the greats from way back i.e. Dark Knight Returns, Year One Etc and Claremont's X-Men. However, it wasn't until a friend let me borrow Morrison's "New X-Men: E is for Extinction" that I was hooked. At that time I erroneously thought not much was going on in comics, but after I read it, I couldn't what was being written especially in such a mainstream comic like X-Men.
But, I couldn't understand why it was so divisive and how some fans absolutely hated the run, especially since it pretty much revitalized the X-Men name and gave way for the first X-Men movie.
Then when I heard Morrison was doing a ongoing Batman run, I followed, but that too was so divisive some people absolutely hate or some people consider it gospel. The arguments for each side tends to be:
"Morrison makes no sense"
"Well if you don't understand him then you aren't smart enough"
I know I am really simplifying it, and I am not trying to start some kind of kerfuffle, because there are legitimate reasons to love and hate Morrison and his particular writing style.
Then Final Crisis happened and boy talk about a event that caused more heated debates in LCS and forums.
Now I know I am only referring to Morrison, the only other run that I can think of is Brian Azzarello's New 52 Wonder Woman.
My question to you is: "Is there another writer or another modern (within the last 15 years) run in the big two MARVEL & DC that have been so divisive?"