View Poll Results: What did you think of this issue?

Voters
24. You may not vote on this poll
  • ★ ★ ★ ★ ★

    3 12.50%
  • ★ ★ ★ ★

    4 16.67%
  • ★ ★ ★

    6 25.00%
  • ★ ★

    7 29.17%
  • 4 16.67%
Page 5 of 5 FirstFirst 12345
Results 61 to 75 of 75
  1. #61
    Ultimate Member Sacred Knight's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    18,725

    Default

    Perhaps confusing is the wrong word. Soulless would be a better one. This has nothing to do with SM/WW and its an odd deflect to paint it as such, really. IMO, the reconciling of the changes was poor on his part (I didn't need it to be pointed out that the clay birth was still not back in, I actually agree that the onus was on specifically pointing out it was back, I made that argument before so that was never a grievance of mine) in regards to the emotional ramifications it had on Diana herself. She went "insane" for a while and then suddenly was not. It was just..lifeless, and it left most of her relationships in the same state as a result.


    To each their own though. I know he has a popular following here, and judging by sales, across the WW fandom for the most part. I on the other hand just think he's highly overrated with the character.
    Last edited by Sacred Knight; 05-30-2018 at 02:43 PM.
    "They can be a great people Kal-El, they wish to be. They only lack the light to show the way. For this reason above all, their capacity for good, I have sent them you. My only son." - Jor-El

  2. #62
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,505

    Default

    Love the Rucka reboot. It let me buy WW again without feeling depressed. Yay Rucka
    If ten years of recording The Young and the Restless for my mother have taught me anything, it's that characters in serial dramas are always happily in love...until they're not

    “The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views...which can be very uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.” - the 4th Doctor

  3. #63
    Ultimate Member SiegePerilous02's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    15,239

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post
    I don't call it confusing, i call it crappy. Rucka's new History is the blandest possible, he utterly failed to make me care about any and all the characters he (re)introduced.
    To each their own, I guess. I cared about quite a few of them.

    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post
    Rucka's Amazon are also incredibly boring goodies in the story because... because, I guess.
    They're good for the same reason the Waynes and the Kents generally are: because they are good people who raised one of the world's best heroes. And they were the only example we had in the DCU of an all female cast doing that. Rucka gave us more named Amazons with distinct characterizations in one issue than Azzarello managed in three years. And Philippus still acted mistrustful towards Steve because he was male, so she wasn't a saint despite overall being a good person.


    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post
    And yes, his Diana was an unloveable character, dissing on the previous continuity which was then utterly erased so those jabs were both uncalled and utterly meaningless, only managing to alienate the fans of the SM/WW pairing, among which I stand.
    If the previous continuity didn't want to be dissed, it in turn shouldn't have dissed the continuity that came before it. What else do you think Diana's dumb as hell "nothing can be built from perfection" comments were, forgetting that there is a WIDE gap between being a perfect saint and tossing babies off cliffs? The Amazons were never perfect, they just weren't cartoonish caricatures who hated musk before either. That kind of writing is inevitably going to get a response. Azzarello shouldn't dish it out if he can't take it (for the record, I don't think he cares that much).

    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post
    Add to that the fact that both the villains and the "Patrons" were incredibly bland and uninteresting, with even ridiculous looks (Rucka's Circe is utterly devoid of anything appealling, down to her appearance, compared to the New 52 one, same for the Gods).
    New 52's Circe's design would be great for a Gotham supervillain who was going for a "demonically possessed Pipi Longstocking" look, but fails utterly when applied to her. Rucka's Circe was designed in casual civilian wear, and could zap herself with another look if she wanted. Characterization wise, her brief appearance was more engaging than the generic "I hate women/I'll get you next time Wonder Woman! And you're little dog too!" Circe of the New 52.

    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post
    I couldn't care less about Cale and her group of evil women to remain on board with the book and even after I've managed to muster the willpower to Wade through the run in full online, I can't remember anything about them beyond "Cale is angry at WW because she fucked up and her daughter was cursed by Greek Gods".
    Then you must be deliberately overlooking a lot of stuff to miss the fact that whereas Diana is empowered by love, Cale (despite loving her daughter and willing to cross any line to save her) views love as a weakness that makes her vulnerable and that others can used against her, and her pride prevents her from just asking Diana for help and thus makes things worse for herself. She's a very human character that lends herself to a Greek tragedy. I used to dislike Cale, but Rebirth shot her up to my top 5 WW villains.

    Robinson though, he wrote her as just being generically angry, and barely mentions her daughter. And has her begging for her life at the hands of Cheetah, which...no.

    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post
    So yeah, in my book, Rucka's second run is an hot piece of rotten meat. At least with Robinson's stale bread run, you're less at risk of dying/getting extremely ill. The best thing which could happen to Diana is that someone down the line utterly disregarded her Rebirth runs and start anew. I don't care if she is the only one rebooting, once more, since her books are basically so secluded from the others that it wouldn't change anything for the rest of the DC continuity.
    I dropped this book after Robinson's first arc, so I'm going to die of starvation if we don't get a good replacement for him.

    Quote Originally Posted by Sacred Knight View Post
    Perhaps confusing is the wrong word. Soulless would be a better one. This has nothing to do with SM/WW and its an odd deflect to paint it as such, really. IMO, the reconciling of the changes was poor on his part (I didn't need it to be pointed out that the clay birth was still not back in, I actually agree that the onus was on specifically pointing out it was back, I made that argument before so that was never a grievance of mine) in regards to the emotional ramifications it had on Diana herself. She went "insane" for a while and then suddenly was not. It was just..lifeless, and it left most of her relationships in the same state as a result.
    To be fair, I do I agree with you that the present day stuff (barring Cheetah's scenes) were weaker than the flashback arcs. Ferdinand's presence miraculously curing her was annoying. But I definitely wouldn't call Year One and especially Godwatch soulless. Especially compared to the tripe we're getting now.

    But why do the relationships need to change? What would be the point of changing her relationship with her mother and the Amazons, especially since messing around with it so much just pissed off too many fans that it would be a dumb business desceison to double down on it. Her relationship with Cheetah was fleshed out after the half assed attempts in the New 52. Her dynamic with Etta DID change by the end of the run, but they botched any interesting direction for that in the next issue. And Batman and Superman's relationships with their major supporting casts don't change all that much either.

    Quote Originally Posted by brettc1 View Post
    Love the Rucka reboot. It let me buy WW again without feeling depressed. Yay Rucka
    Yeah me too. Now, on the other hand (well, I'm not buying it, but...).

  4. #64
    Astonishing Member Korath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Toulouse, France
    Posts
    4,437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SiegePerilous02 View Post
    They're good for the same reason the Waynes and the Kents generally are: because they are good people who raised one of the world's best heroes. And they were the only example we had in the DCU of an all female cast doing that. Rucka gave us more named Amazons with distinct characterizations in one issue than Azzarello managed in three years. And Philippus still acted mistrustful towards Steve because he was male, so she wasn't a saint despite overall being a good person.
    I'll just adress it, because the rest is clearly a matter of taste, and everything Rucka did since Rebirth for Diana was for me utterly worthless or disgusting. So to each their own. But what I meant here is that once Diana left the Island, the Amazons had no reason to reapper in the story, except for Rucka to paint them as those goodi two shoes. And that's even without taking into account the fact that I loath the depiction of a segregationnist and autarcic society in a good light to begin with. Hyppolyta and the others were just taking panel space because Rucka wanted to appease fans of pre-Flashpoint, I guess.

    Also, I would like to point out that nothing Azzarello did precluded the main bulk of Diana's stories to have happened. Rucka made sure that nothing could ever be used from New 52, thus utterly erasing the five years of it (or relegating them as an ELseworld, still better in its mythological depiction than what he did). That's why I say he dissed the previous continuity.

  5. #65
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,505

    Default

    Yay for appeasing fans pre-Flashpoint and jettisoning Azzarello.
    If ten years of recording The Young and the Restless for my mother have taught me anything, it's that characters in serial dramas are always happily in love...until they're not

    “The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views...which can be very uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.” - the 4th Doctor

  6. #66
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    34,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post
    I'll just adress it, because the rest is clearly a matter of taste, and everything Rucka did since Rebirth for Diana was for me utterly worthless or disgusting. So to each their own. But what I meant here is that once Diana left the Island, the Amazons had no reason to reapper in the story, except for Rucka to paint them as those goodi two shoes. And that's even without taking into account the fact that I loath the depiction of a segregationnist and autarcic society in a good light to begin with. Hyppolyta and the others were just taking panel space because Rucka wanted to appease fans of pre-Flashpoint, I guess.

    Also, I would like to point out that nothing Azzarello did precluded the main bulk of Diana's stories to have happened. Rucka made sure that nothing could ever be used from New 52, thus utterly erasing the five years of it (or relegating them as an ELseworld, still better in its mythological depiction than what he did). That's why I say he dissed the previous continuity.
    Rucka did not remove the clay origin. Azzarello's book by definition was meant to have been a reboot which meant the main bulk of Diana's previous stories did not happen.

  7. #67
    Astonishing Member Korath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Toulouse, France
    Posts
    4,437

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Agent Z View Post
    Rucka did not remove the clay origin. Azzarello's book by definition was meant to have been a reboot which meant the main bulk of Diana's previous stories did not happen.
    But they could have happened. Nothing in his run prevented it, nowhere was it said that it was her Year One or that nothing of her past existed. Rucka purposely erased at least five years of stories (since Azzarello wasn't the only one touched by his retcon of her never going back to Themyscira) and failed to establish anything meaningful to fill the void he had thus created. Some peoples here are gushing over Godwatch, but it was an utterly boring storyline, with boring and uninteresting character, except for nsotalgia fanatics who got to fawn over the return of so many older rogues, failing to notice that none of them had a lasting appeal for newcomers like myself. It's a problem for Robinson also, with perhaps the exception of his Silver Swan, and even then it's a big perhaps.

    And Rebirth was marketed as "not a reboot" when the New 52 was open about its rebooting nature. Which makes what Rucka did far worse : it was insulting for the works of creators before him, smacked of grand-standing and yet utterly failed to make me care about any of the characters, even Diana. In fact, while Azzarello finally made me realize that there was a lot to love with Diana, Rucka's rebirth run soured me so much that I more or less hoped that even her movie would tank so D.C. would be forced to go another way with her. Thankfully, it didn't happen in the end, but Rucka's Wonder Woman is totally unlovable as a character for me, and while his run is hardly better, Robinson's Diana is light-years ahead of Rucka's. For all his faults, he had least reconcilied me with Wonder Woman.

  8. #68
    Moderator Nyssane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    4,744

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post
    Some peoples here are gushing over Godwatch, but it was an utterly boring storyline, with boring and uninteresting character, except for nsotalgia fanatics who got to fawn over the return of so many older rogues, failing to notice that none of them had a lasting appeal for newcomers like myself.
    That sounds like a you problem. Most reviews and fan reactions I've seen, even from newcomers, have noted that Rucka's Rebirth run was instrumental in fixing the "Wonder Woman's villains suck" issue. It all comes down to personal taste, so you may not like them, but you're in the minority.

    And Rebirth was marketed as "not a reboot" when the New 52 was open about its rebooting nature. Which makes what Rucka did far worse : it was insulting for the works of creators before him, smacked of grand-standing and yet utterly failed to make me care about any of the characters, even Diana.
    It was marketed as "not a reboot," yes, but it was also (very strongly, I might add) marketed as a "return to the classics." DC acknowledged that the New 52 wasn't the success they were hoping for so they returned to a more Post-Crisis feel to appease longtime fans. Maybe to the detriment of some newcomers like you, unfortunately, but it is what it is.

    Anyway, this probably isn't the thread for all this anyway. Isn't there a Rucka vs. Azzarello thread already out there?

  9. #69
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    34,115

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post
    But they could have happened. Nothing in his run prevented it, nowhere was it said that it was her Year One or that nothing of her past existed. Rucka purposely erased at least five years of stories (since Azzarello wasn't the only one touched by his retcon of her never going back to Themyscira) and failed to establish anything meaningful to fill the void he had thus created. Some peoples here are gushing over Godwatch, but it was an utterly boring storyline, with boring and uninteresting character, except for nsotalgia fanatics who got to fawn over the return of so many older rogues, failing to notice that none of them had a lasting appeal for newcomers like myself. It's a problem for Robinson also, with perhaps the exception of his Silver Swan, and even then it's a big perhaps.

    And Rebirth was marketed as "not a reboot" when the New 52 was open about its rebooting nature. Which makes what Rucka did far worse : it was insulting for the works of creators before him, smacked of grand-standing and yet utterly failed to make me care about any of the characters, even Diana. In fact, while Azzarello finally made me realize that there was a lot to love with Diana, Rucka's rebirth run soured me so much that I more or less hoped that even her movie would tank so D.C. would be forced to go another way with her. Thankfully, it didn't happen in the end, but Rucka's Wonder Woman is totally unlovable as a character for me, and while his run is hardly better, Robinson's Diana is light-years ahead of Rucka's. For all his faults, he had least reconcilied me with Wonder Woman.
    How? There are numerous stories that are completely incompatible with the New 52. To start with, the idea of the Amazons being created for some purpose by the Olympians is laughed off in the New 52 when that was why they were created pre Flashpoint. Diana was the only child born on Themyscira pre Flashpoint. In the New 52 every Amazon except Diana is born as a result of the pirate raids. Steve's mother is never mentioned nor appears and Azzarello's origin issue treated Steve as the first contact Themyscira had with the outside world. Ares' entire motive and relationship with the Amazons in the New 52 is completely different from what it was like pre-Flashpoint where she was never trained by him. Athena desposed Zeus from the throne in Rucka's first run. in New 52 she makes sure he never leaves it. Hippolyta showed no attraction to Zeus pre-Flashpoint and I doubt she would have after what his son did to her and her people. And I'd really like to know how she went from having black hair to blonde hair. Speaking of Zeus, how is Cassie bow both his daughter and grand daughter? You'd think Diana would have brought that up in the previous continuity.

    The New 52 was not open about it's rebooting nature, at least not initially. You'd have writers and editors (including Azzarello himself) insisting that everything before was in continuity even when it contradicted what was shown on the page. In the end, Rucka only did to Azzarello's run what Azzarello did to previous runs - dismissed them as no longer existing

  10. #70
    Wonder Moderator Gaelforce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    2,903

    Default

    Aaaaand let's get back to discussing the issue, shall we?

    If you want to slam or praise some other creative team, find the right thread for it. Debating the merits or failings of past runs on the book should go elsewhere, please.
    Gaelforce
    WonderAdmin
    THE CBR COMMUNITY STANDARDS & RULES - Ignorance of the rules is no excuse!

  11. #71
    The Detective Man The Dying Detective's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    Look East
    Posts
    4,513

    Default

    You have to give Robinson credit for not throwing away the foundation established by Rucka it's as good as it's going to get with his run. Also I think people would be more worried about how Tynion is going to handle Cheetah on his Legion of Doom book.
    "Excellent!" I cried. "Elementary," said he

  12. #72
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Korath View Post

    And Rebirth was marketed as "not a reboot" when the New 52 was open about its rebooting nature. Which makes what Rucka did far worse : it was insulting for the works of creators before him, smacked of grand-standing and yet utterly failed to make me care about any of the characters, even Diana.
    LOL.

    Anyone would think that Rucka sneaked into the DC offices, wrote the story without anyone knowing, bribed Nicola Scott to draw it, stole into the printers, and secretly ran off tens of thousands of copies of Wonder Woman while the editors were all looking the other way.

    Meanwhile, Robinson also has an editorial mandate, but I simply don't find his story very engaging. Jason is not as offensive to me as the Azzarellozons, but he takes up way too much space in the book that could be use for...

    ...well, Steve!
    Last edited by brettc1; 05-31-2018 at 06:59 AM.
    If ten years of recording The Young and the Restless for my mother have taught me anything, it's that characters in serial dramas are always happily in love...until they're not

    “The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views...which can be very uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.” - the 4th Doctor

  13. #73
    Amazing Member
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    76

    Default

    Should wonder woman be faster than flash since she is powered by Hermes who is the god of speed and the Godwave which is the thing that created the speed force?

  14. #74
    The Comixeur Mel Dyer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    3,166

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by brettc1 View Post
    ...Meanwhile, Robinson also has an editorial mandate, but I simply don't find his story very engaging. Jason is not as offensive to me as the Azzarellozons, but he takes up way too much space in the book that could be use for...

    ...well, Steve!
    The WW comic already has a well-rounded cast of male supporting characters: Steve Trevor, Ferdinand and I Ching. In them, you find Diana's romantic lead, the lovable/pitiable monster and the wise, old mentor - all time-honored literary archetypes. There are large and small, regular and more infrequent roles for ALL of them to play in her on-going narrative, ..without Jason. Isn't it a shame that no writer seems to appreciate that?

    And if an official male Wonder is desired, Diana's cousin, Virbius Rex (Hippolytos), who's basically a Woodland Aquaman, fills out the playbill, very nicely.

    Etta is Diana's best friend, and I'm still waiting for an editorial mandate that requires her to be used, as much as Jimmy Olsen or Alfred. How about every or every other issue?
    COMBINING THE BIGBADITUDE OF THANOS WITH CHEETAH'S FEROCITY, IS JANUS WONDER WOMAN'S GREATEST SUPERVILLAIN?...on WONDABUNGA!!! Look alive, Kangaliers!

  15. #75
    Extraordinary Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    7,505

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mel Dyer View Post
    The WW comic already has a well-rounded cast of male supporting characters: Steve Trevor, Ferdinand and I Ching. In them, you find Diana's romantic lead, the lovable/pitiable monster and the wise, old mentor - all time-honored literary archetypes. There are large and small, regular and more infrequent roles for ALL of them to play in her on-going narrative, ..without Jason. Isn't it a shame that no writer seems to appreciate that?

    And if an official male Wonder is desired, Diana's cousin, Virbius Rex (Hippolytos), who's basically a Woodland Aquaman, fills out the playbill, very nicely.

    Etta is Diana's best friend, and I'm still waiting for an editorial mandate that requires her to be used, as much as Jimmy Olsen or Alfred. How about every or every other issue?
    Yeah.

    We haven't seen Ferdinand for months. Or I Ching.

    And in case nobody has noticed, Steve has not been given much steam as a romantic interest lately. Some occasional lip service, and I don't mean kissing.
    If ten years of recording The Young and the Restless for my mother have taught me anything, it's that characters in serial dramas are always happily in love...until they're not

    “The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views...which can be very uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.” - the 4th Doctor

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •