“The reason of the unreasonableness which against my reason is wrought, doth so weaken my reason, as with all reason I do justly complain on your beauty.”
― Miguel de Cervantes Don Quixote
I first discovered a page from Excalibur on a Nightcrawler fansite when I was twelve-- when I realized there was a whole title focused on Kurt and Kitty on a team in England my jaw just about unhinged.
Nauck and Immonen make their respective books worth it. Agreed-- art is like prose, in that sense. I stumble over bad anatomy like it's bad grammar. With great art, occasionally I'll hit a "wow" moment and pause, but, for me, "great" is defined by lively readability.
(bless Cockrum, too, for all the fantastic Nightcrawler moments... and for the character!)
*sigh*
Yeah, I miss those days. The days when being put on an X-Men book meant you're a superstar. Not that there's been absolutely atrocious artists (seriously? Immonen, Coipel, Quitely, Cassaday...all amazing artists), but it seems like other titles seem to be the "it" titles these days.
Plus, I don't feel the writers who take on the X-Men these days are really passionate about the characters. Maybe they feel like they can do something special and want to do ok, but I think it's more about them wanting to do something cool starring the X-Men, rather than something cool with the X-Men.
I don't know if I'm really saying it correctly.
Find me on Instagram and Twitter - @arfguy
https://whoaskd.com/
^I get what you mean. A good example is the large volume of present-day writers and/or artists want to do THEIR version of Sentinels. Sometimes I feel the creators on the books love the giant robots more than the readership.
CANON: "Cyclops, the most important mutant in 616" - The scientific community of the 616
Yu/Ribic tied for #1
Kuberts
Mann
Cassady
Copiel
Bachalo
Opena
Great thoughts, Sungila and SkaraBrae. I totally agree: the word is 'readability', and the point is empathizing with the characters, not using them as an excuse for showing off.
Maybe I'll be struck dead for saying this, but I don't think Cockrum was a great draftsman --he was slightly rude, and not a very good narrator. Nevertheless, he was an EXTRAORDINARY designer: Second Genesis X-Men, Starjammers, Mystique...he conceived a lot of characters and costumes that have been proved unbeatables. Through the years, a million artists have done their best to change them, but they always come back. Nightcrawler's costume is so simply perfect as that designed by Ditko for Spidey.
Pardon?
Phil Jimenez
Kaare Andrews
Simone Bianchi
Frank Quitely
Steven Sanders
Juan Jose Ryp
John Cassaday
Igor Kordey
Scott Eaton
John Paul Leon
Yes, it is confirmed by Claremont himself in interviews. In the 90s comics shifted gear from story, nuance, and continuity to financial investments. The 90s Marvel Comic management staff and editors hired artists and gave more control over the comics to them in hopes of increasing the monetary value of certain issues for speculators and short lived economic booms. This practice eventually caused Marvel comics to become bankrupt by the late 90s. That is why Marvel Comics sold the rights of the X-Men and Fantastic Four to Twentieth Century Fox. Same for Spider-Man to Sony Entertainment.
Claremont was booted for "fresh new talent."
Byrne is, for me, the classic (New) X-Men artist, being the artist on the strip when I first became a fan.
John Romita jr I love, the period of his art being the apex of my X-Men fanaticism.
Paul Smith, again a great period of the X-Men that I loved.
Bill Sienkiewicz, who's New Mutants work I still find exciting and inspiring today.
Alan Davis, without whom Excalibur was an empty shell.
Neal Adams did some fantastic work on the original X-Men, the man is a legend.
Art Adams X annuals were breathtaking.
I loved Bachalo's Gen-X, and I even still like his work today.
Immonen is also very cool, though I don't associate him with the X-titles in particular.
Nick Bradshaw, that's who I kept forgetting!
http://www.shadowandflamewithmagik.com/
My Blog following the adventures of Kitty Pryde, Lockheed and Magik
I have a big soft spot for Land mainly due to Endsong. I wouldn't necessarily say hes my favorite, but it always stands out to me.
Paul Smith
Alan Davis (Let's be honest, pretty much everything about the first however many issues of Excalibur was awesome)
Whilce Portacio (I thought his run on X-Men was pretty damn good)
Marc Silvestri (More for his run on Wolverine)
Bill Sienkiewicz (Unlike most people, I preferred him when he was a slightly surrealist version of Neal Adams, as opposed to when his figures started
to get really angular and distorted).
Tony Daniel (Loved his kinetic, sketchy, over-the-top style on X-Force)
Jim Lee (If you don't like Jim Lee's work on X-Men, I find it hard to believe that you like comic book art)
Chris Bachalo (circa Generation X #1-5 and Generation Next #1-4 - once he changed from being Bill Sienkiewicz influenced to being Joe Madureira influenced, I completely lost interest)
Jackson Guice (Very underappreciated photorealist style - just a top notch artist)
Andy Kubert (Very distinctive, slightly odd style [everyone has angular cheekbones and slightly Asian looking eyes] but Kubert does cinematic camera angles and poses better than most artists and with Matt Ryan's fine-lined, detailed inks to add some realism, his issues of X-Men were great)
Ian Churchill (Did some good issues of Deadpool and of Cable in the 1990s. Good solid, detailed linework and design).
Olivier Coipel (Quirky style, but once you get used to the way he draws faces [nose optional], probably the strongest artist to have worked on the X-Men in years. His three issues of X-Men were stunning - but three issues!!! Come on Marvel!)
Jerome Opena (His issues of X-Force were just plain gorgeous)
Stuart Imonen (His work on Superman: Secret Identity shows that he's capable of better than the work he's done in All New X-Men, but his work on ANXM was still streets ahead of most of his competitors. A real draughtsman with real talent, not just a cartoonist.)
Last edited by genki_desu; 07-23-2014 at 09:40 AM.