Originally Posted by
akiresu_
I think what's interesting is if you read this in-text, it's a condemnation of reactionary thinking. Like imagine this isn't a mutant, but a transphobic feminist, or perhaps a racial supremacist in an otherwise radical community. Exchange mutant with woman and I'm sure I've seen this same vitriol targeted at trans people over twitter.
Yet, with the meta text and our knowledge of mutancy at large (and particularly the Inhumans/Mutant war), this is a sympathetic character. We know that "mutantkind" has an entirely different context, one where mutants have been gassed and sterilised because of the Inhuman's racial superiority (prioritising new inhumans, disregarding mutant deaths, is a pretty clear cut display of superiority imo). We disagree with the method, but I think a lot of readers will be sympathising here more than the text wants them to. Because instead of having a marginalised person being gate-kept out of a community, as the writer wants us to read the book, the one-for-one metaphor shows us a member of a privileged class (Inhumans) who wants to co-opt and exploit the space of a marginalised group (Mutants).