Page 223 of 325 FirstFirst ... 123173213219220221222223224225226227233273323 ... LastLast
Results 3,331 to 3,345 of 4870
  1. #3331
    BANNED Killerbee911's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luprki View Post
    Actually the producer is lord over the project, everything has to go through him or her. The producer takes credit for all aspects of a movie. Feige is doing a good job at what he is doing with the MCU, but the big question is can he ventured out of the MCU formula.
    So far he has showed he can’t.
    .
    Feige was a on producer of X1, X2, X3 and Deadpool. Kevin Feige is also a producer of Electra,Blade 3, Daredevil, Hulk 1 and 2. This whole chain of thought of what on what type of movies "Feige makes is silly"

  2. #3332
    Post Editing OCD Confuzzled's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Location
    Swingin' Above Ya
    Posts
    11,999

    Default

    Like Feige had the level of control on those non-MCU films like he has on the MCU films. He threatened to walk if Disney didn't fire Ike Perlmutter and make him the ultimate power over Marvel Studios (a necessary threat though to ensure the success and survival of the MCU in the long run).

    Having said that, isn't Black Panther proof that he can venture out of the MCU formula and give a director, if he or she is established enough, the required creative freedom?

  3. #3333
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,989

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Beaddle View Post
    He does the opposite to directors. If he brings directors in and let them do their own thing, MCU would not be sterilized, there should be no formula there.Thor has no reason to follow the footsteps GOTG. Spiderman and Ant-Man should not be the samething. Captain Marvel should not be retreading Iron Man 1, down to carol trying to do Stark's quips. There are no directors in MCU, there is only a formula.
    Their formula is making a good blockbuster. Their style, which is director driven, has been shown to have quite a degree of range.

  4. #3334
    Ultimate Member Wiccan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    12,923

    Default

    Ike Perlmutter just limited Marvel Studios. If you think the current movies are too formulatic, with him it would be even more. They have only gotten better ever since he left.

  5. #3335
    Mighty Member Maestro 216's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,644

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiccan View Post
    Ike Perlmutter just limited Marvel Studios. If you think the current movies are too formulatic, with him it would be even more. They have only gotten better ever since he left.
    If he was in charge Black Panther and Captain Marvel would have only come out this year. Also Inhumans would have gotten their movie. >.>

  6. #3336
    Ultimate Member Wiccan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    12,923

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maestro 216 View Post
    If he was in charge Black Panther and Captain Marvel would have only come out this year. Also Inhumans would have gotten their movie. >.>
    He didn't even want to make Captain Marvel and Black Panther. He only allowed them if Feige accepted to make Inhumans too, which is why Inhumans got dropped as soon as Feige got full control.

  7. #3337
    BANNED
    Join Date
    Apr 2019
    Posts
    1,299

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Killerbee911 View Post
    Feige was a on producer of X1, X2, X3 and Deadpool. Kevin Feige is also a producer of Electra,Blade 3, Daredevil, Hulk 1 and 2. This whole chain of thought of what on what type of movies "Feige makes is silly"
    All those movies you named Feige was an associate producer, executive producer or co-producer. He was not the main producer which oversees all aspects of production.



    Quote Originally Posted by Confuzzled View Post
    Having said that, isn't Black Panther proof that he can venture out of the MCU formula and give a director, if he or she is established enough, the required creative freedom?
    No


    Quote Originally Posted by Wiccan View Post
    Ike Perlmutter just limited Marvel Studios. If you think the current movies are too formulatic, with him it would be even more. They have only gotten better ever since he left.
    Disney couldn’t control Perlmutter, so they choose Feige, because they can control him better.
    Feige is just an employee, he has to answer to Alan Horn and whatever Horn says is final.
    Feign is just the face of the MCU, but Horn is the ruler.

  8. #3338
    Mighty Member Maestro 216's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2019
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    1,644

    Default

    But Feige at least on a public level seems easier to work with over Ike.

  9. #3339
    Ultimate Member Wiccan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    12,923

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luprki View Post
    Disney couldn’t control Perlmutter, so they choose Feige, because they can control him better.
    Feige is just an employee, he has to answer to Alan Horn and whatever Horn says is final.
    Feign is just the face of the MCU, but Horn is the ruler.
    LOL. Disney didn't have anything againt Ike Perlmutter. He's still in charge of Marvel Entertainment. The change was that Marvel Studios used to be part of Marvel Entertainment(which is why they had to report to Perlmutter) and Feige asked to be separate. Disney had no reason to go against Perlmutter as Marvel and the MCU were already/still doing great while he was on(though now without him they're doing even better).

    And weren't you just saying a while ago that Feige was controlling everything which is why the directors can't do anything? You need to stop making up some ridiculous new theory every time someone refutes your arguments. Just because Alan Horn is Feige's superior in Disney doesn't mean he has anything to do with the MCU creatively.

  10. #3340
    BANNED
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,989

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wiccan View Post
    You need to stop making up some ridiculous new theory every time someone refutes your arguments..
    Quoted for extreme accuracy.

  11. #3341
    BANNED Killerbee911's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by luprki View Post
    All those movies you named Feige was an associate producer, executive producer or co-producer. He was not the main producer which oversees all aspects of production.

    .
    What do you think that means. Executive producer and Studio Head are way different things

    Let be clear about something Kevin Feige gets wayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy to much credit for Marvel success. Which is why I am also not giving him as much credit for "creative" movie making flaws so to speak you guys are want to blame him for right now.

    What Kevin Feige deserve credit for 23 movies that feel cohesively that they are in the same universe despite having different themes and types of superheroes. What you some of guys are calling a flaw is it is a feature , It is like comic event and Marvel uses Stuart Immonen, R.B. Silva, Pepe Larraz, Jim Cheung on art versus a event with Joe Mad, Alex Ross, Rob Liefeld, John Romita Jr on event. Which is going to go better? Obviously the first one because while being different stuff they feel similar.
    Last edited by Killerbee911; 08-03-2019 at 09:34 PM.

  12. #3342
    Incredible Member Wissenschaft's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    806

    Default

    I feel like the russo brothers deserve a lot of credit for making some of the most successful marvel films and really fleshing out several characters.

  13. #3343
    BANNED Killerbee911's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Posts
    4,814

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Wissenschaft View Post
    I feel like the russo brothers deserve a lot of credit for making some of the most successful marvel films and really fleshing out several characters.
    We live in some weird world where if X-men movies where made the same quality and maturity level as Black Panther, Infinity Wars, Captain America Winter Soldier and Civil War. That it would be bad thing . That is fate they are scared of apparently "Oh no marvel is going to make X-men movie quality of Winter soldier".

  14. #3344
    Ultimate Member Wiccan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    12,923

    Default

    To be fair we don't know how the X-Men movies are gonna go. I don't think they'll be anything like The Winter Soldier. Even when it comes to being mature, they'll probably have a bit more humor. And that's fine, as long as it's also really serious when it needs to be(unlike say Ragnarok and GOTG).

  15. #3345
    BANNED Beaddle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2019
    Posts
    1,199

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Killerbee911 View Post
    We live in some weird world where if X-men movies where made the same quality and maturity level as Black Panther, Infinity Wars, Captain America Winter Soldier and Civil War. That it would be bad thing . That is fate they are scared of apparently "Oh no marvel is going to make X-men movie quality of Winter soldier".
    There is no Disney movie that has the same level of quality and maturity. Its either Disney ends up with a more lighthearted juvenile plot, reduce the drama or they mess up the technical parts of their movies.

    Quote Originally Posted by Theleviathan View Post
    Their formula is making a good blockbuster. Their style, which is director driven, has been shown to have quite a degree of range.
    The forumla is about making processed factory movies. Good blockbusters would be depending on what your tastes and expectations are. Obviously I found Disney very limited with Marvel. You will be contradicting by admitting they have a formula, if they have a formula then there is nothing about their movies that is director driven.


    Quote Originally Posted by luprki View Post
    I’m actually surprise Disney+ is going this route. Disney+ would be the perfect media to introduce mutants. But I guess Feige’s limited vision can’t go beyond of the MCU. Everything he has produced by himself is a MCU movie, now he is producing four Disney+ shows and all are part of the MCU. Four show with characters we have seen for years. Can this guy do anything different?
    The other obsession with Feige is to sell everything about Marvel through the MCU. He obviously has a limited mind. What happened to standalone films, I prefer what DC is doing. The upcoming Batman movies won't have any big tie ins to the DCEU. It makes movies more authentic.


    Quote Originally Posted by Confuzzled View Post
    Spider-Man: Far From Home becoming the biggest Spider-Man film of all time despite coming on the heels of Endgame says otherwise though. People are hungry for MCU more than ever, especially in overseas markets like Asia and Latin America.
    Everyone keeps pointing out that FFH is the highest grossing Spiderman film of all time but where are you placing it in your Spiderman film rankings? Its the problem with Disney, they only care about cashing in the money , they don't care about making the best films they possibly can. Difference between FFH and Spiderverse/Spiderman 2.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •