I don't judge things because they're different from 90's/early 2000's comics. I judge them initially based off what we're told and, should I give the book a shot, what I read. Do i have my biases? Of course, we all do. But there are tons of comics I love both from before and after that era. I think
New Super-Man and the Justice League of China deserves a place among the all-time great DC runs,
Green Lanterns made Simon Baz and Jessica Cruz my favorite GLs and with the exception of Hill's Tec/Outsiders, the only DC book I'm excited for right now is Justice League Odyssey, and with the exception of Azrael, none of the main characters in any of those three books existed or were doing much of anything relevant during my favorite era of DC. I'm biased yes, but I'm really not the "NOTHING WILL EVER BE AS GOOD AS BACK THEN" fan some people here try to make me out to be.
First, thank you for using my correct pronouns.
Second, I usually do give the things I suspect will be awful at least an issue. Not my fault that most of DC's offerings either aren't interesting to me (in those cases I typically keep my mouth mostly shut) or aren't up to par for me quality wise as a reader.
I'm on the Autistic Spectrum. This site is basically my equivalent to a fidget spinner. I almost always have it open and I'm rarely
just here, usually working on something or watching something while I read and post. Posting here, with both positive and negative thoughts, is a way of keeping my cool and my focus. When something is announced or talked about that sounds exciting to me, I come on to rave about that.