I'm hesitant to post this topic because I am worried about the response this is going to generate, but I could use some advice from all of you very knowledgeable people who have been following Marvel comics for some time.
I just recently got into comics and I've mostly only read Ant-Man comics as he is my favorite character. Recently though, while looking up information about some of the more recent runs that he is a part of I had the misfortune of coming across an "internet personality" of sorts who has garnered an impressive following making fun of some more modern Marvel characters saying or doing science-y things that really aren't accurate or true.
Without getting into too much detail, he's basically arguing that having these characters "wuv da science," as he calls it, is part of some conspiracy by a certain group of people.
Now my question for you fine folks is--and forgive me in advance for my ignorance--hasn't bad/silly/inaccurate science been a part of many Marvel plots and origin stories since the very beginning? Aren't comics about Hank Pym, Bruce Banner, Reed Richards, Tony Stark, Peter Parker (and most of his enemies), the X-Men, etc. full of pseudo-science, exaggeration, and intentionally mis-interpreted scientific ideas?
And if that is this case, why were people OK with these plot-lines before but not OK with them now when characters like Ms. Marvel and the Wasp are involved?
Thanks for any light you guys can shed on this subject and all contributions are greatly appreciated!