Quote Originally Posted by HeroVladimir93 View Post
Normally, I try to keep an open mind about Krypton's destruction since it's just a small aspect in Superman's history. What matters is that Krypton blew up and Superman survived to have a full life. Krypton's destruction, in my opinion, isn't something that should be constantly modified because it doesn't need to be modified. Who cares if it was a natural disaster or an act of terrorism? Make all the explanations you want, but Superman's personality and ideals wouldn't change.
IMO, it's a function of writers that feel an adversarial confrontation isn't compelling without some kind of vengeance-driving personal stake in the conflict. Superman's home is Earth, and has been for almost all of his remembered existence, nor is he usually portrayed as a Kryptonian Patriot, so I'm not really sure a "[insert supervillain] destroyed my home" approach is right for Superman.