So you're saying you think Pratt would publically support a man he thought might molest his kids?
Common sense alone would tell you what the answer is. He's publicly supporting Gunn. Unless he was an idiot incapable of thinking beyond the next 5 seconds he would have asked himself that question at some point before making his support, public. The media would only ask him if there was a smoking gun, and 10 year old tweets aren't a smoking gun. Pardon the pun. In fact, you can infer the Bible verses he gave before outright supporting him was him wrestling with said question.
You phrased it as a "gotcha" question. What do you think it would achieve? We don't have Pratt here to ask, but we have you, the "star" of this thread now, to ask. You know how you'd react if he gave a Yes and if he gave a No. So what would those reactions be?
No one has asked him this ridiculous question in order for the answer to be made public or not, don't shift goalposts. What is public is his support of Gunn. What is unknown (to just you for some reason but ok) is and I quote "Would he leave his son alone with Gunn without second thoughts?" You're either dodging or conflating, but fine, maybe that makes it clearer.
If this question was asked as per YOUR scenario, YOU know how you'd respond if he gave a yes or a no, what is it?
It's obvious the troll is just concerned.
"I rhyme with tyre - And cause pollution - I think you'll find - It's the best solution: What Am I?"
"And that's the essential problem with 'Planetary' right there. When Elijah Snow says, 'The world is a strange place'... he gets Dracula, Doc Savage and Godzilla... When we say it, we get The Captain Fire-Cock Rock 'n' Roll Spectacular."
~ Pól Rua
LOL Yep, you did. And ironically I didn't realize I pulled it out of him until you said something.
So Raiders, when you said:
...you actually slipped up and replied to how you'd REACT if the answer was yes to your query? I wish you had been straightforward all along but asked and answered, thanks.