Originally Posted by
millernumber1
Including Cass in Outsiders should have been obvious, given Dixon and Tieri's setup - fill in writer or no, he completely ignored everything that came before. And even if we say "he just wrote Cass out because of no personal dislike whatsoever", that doesn't deal with his role in turning Cass evilwas already transitioning to writing during that time and was gone soon after. If it was a matter of his position then what happened to his successors in that position? They didn't bother with Cass either.
He was literally given the job of ignoring everything that came before him. The previous writer had a massive falling out, ofcourse everything he built up to was going to be shelved for a fresh start. Cass is not an Outsiders classic and you really have no reason to expect every Outsiders writer is going to use her. Its about Brion, Jeff, Tatsu, Rex and Halo first and foremost. A writer may introduce additional characters but there is no guarantee a successor will follow them. Snyder got rid of Jess and Simon and replaced them with John, Martian and Hawkgirl on JL. Does it mean he hates them? You think Enchantress, Croc and Katana will be part of Suicide Squad forever? obviously no.
Batman and Robin Eternal was Tynion's project. Seeley was helping another writer tell a story.
The Destiny issue was loaded with cameos galore and background fodder in non speaking roles but the real focus was on Superman and Dick.
Compare this to his use of Damian in Nightwing must Die and Nightwing Rebirth. It also appears that he's made Damian Batman in Injustice. The difference is astronomical.
Babs was Robin?
Notice how weak your examples are, you are literally using once in dozens of issues cameos.
Snyder helped his protege get a career using his influence as the main Batman writer. Where was his affection for Cass and Steph in those 50 plus issues of his run, Metal and all its tie inns, All Star etc? His co collaborations involves discussing the plot with the other writers and then stamping his name for a few extra bucks. The story ideas, the scripting etc are all done by the others.
What you ultimately feel about Tomasi as you stated here is your right. But he can write Jason well if you've read Arkham Knight comics and his Tim is ok and moreover Snyder, Dixon and a whole host of others do the exact same thing as Tomasi. King just had Bruce almost kill Mr Freeze over his woman dumping him. Makes Tomasi's Batman who lost his son seem far more mild.
Seeley actually did include Steph in Nightwing (as one of Dick's prominent dream allies against the dream-invader villain), and he wrote her in Batman and Robin Eternal.
King explicitly included everyone in the death panel who was Robin. It wasn't random. It's not super significant, but it's not an accident.
Snyder wouldn't have helped Tynion do what he did if he didn't have some kind of affection for the characters. I have made similar accusations about Snyder - that he claims to love Steph and Cass, but never writes them himself - but people have apparently talked to him at cons and tell me he's a really big fan of them.
My personal dislike of Tomasi's writing is only partly because of his history (imagined or not) with Cass, and more to do with things I've gone into when discussion Batman and Robin (the n52 run) previously - I don't like the way he treated Jason and Tim, and I don't like the way he excuses Bruce and Damian's morally wrong actions by using sympathy for their pain instead of showing a change in behavior. It's complicated, and a long run that includes a lot of actions that must be interpreted. I've said many, many times that I think he's a very, very skilled writer. I don't like the morality that I read in his books, so I don't really like reading his stuff. But that dislike isn't mostly because of his history with Cass (or anything to do with Steph). It's because I just don't like what he writes - not because it's badly written, but because I disagree with what I believe it's saying. And if you disagree with me about what it's saying, that's also perfectly valid.