Uncanny with Gillen sold very well, and his 2 Sinister stories are the best Sinister stories
Uncanny with Gillen sold very well, and his 2 Sinister stories are the best Sinister stories
It's due to some greedy Marvel editors who keep relaunching number 1 because number 1 sells.
People don't care about number 1 anymore because it is too frequent and too many relaunches.
They should go back to basics and continue the old numbering to avoid confusion.
MAGNETO was right,TONY was right, VARYS was right.
Proud member of House Ravenclaw and loyal bannerman to House Baratheon
"I am an optimist even though I am told everything I do is negative and cynical" --Armando Iannucci
Uncanny returning in November. According to Jordan D. White.
20180723_034818.jpg
The X-Editors probby knew how difficult Remenders run would be if no one dared utter the *gulp* "M-Word" in Havoks presence...one slip up and BOOM!! plasma blast and hobo puss to the face
I literally stopped purchasing Marvel comics when Uncanny X-Men was canceled.
They took the adjective that has been associated to the X-Men for nearly 40 years and to prop up the Avengers, gave the Avengers the Uncanny moniker. I found this so disrespectful that I couldn't support this organization. Here's hoping that brighter days are coming
Uncanny X-Men should always be the core book, no if, ands or buts.
Jean
Cyclops
Storm
Wolverine
Everyone else should be interchangeable
Appreciation Thread Indexes
Marvel | Spider-Man | X-Men | NEW!! DC Comics | Batman | Superman | Wonder Woman
I wholeheartedly agree with this 150%
This on the the other hand....
How could this lead to good storytelling? Not considering I find those 4 to be the least interesting X-Men (thanks to an intro to New Mutants them GenX) but have four "stars" will eventually lead to stagnation and "bottlenecking" where every conceivable thing happens to a few characters while their are newer and newer chars getting crammed down with limbo and shitty story arcs
Adjective was important when the X-Men was the only mutant team in the 1960s. Yes, they were uncanny when compared to other teams.
But when the X-Men have grown so many folds, we really need to have several teams without the adjectives.
So the colored teams are a natural progression.
Even when the first core team split into two , they were called gold and blue team although the title didn't change.
Hopefully, we don't have vol 1, vol 2 etc , it's so confusing after just 30 issues for each volume.
I can understand if they start another volume after issue 999 but nowdays they just relaunch after every 30 issues.
So in 10 years time, we have probably vol. 1000. LOL.
I don’t diagree thay the relaunch thing is annoying, but the other stuff you said isn’t true really.
Marvel keeps doing relaunches to number one because they get a sales bump. So clearly they are following the market trend that the readers are setting.
On another note I do agree with something someone said earlier and I think it’s thag most of us vastly underestimate the negative effect of people stealing comics by reading them free online.
Your favorite superhero- the one you visit these forums to talk about. Would they talk to others the way you do on this message board?
While I get the idea of disrespect, what peeves me off about moving the adjective is that it confuses the branding. Is Marvel trying to dilute their brands into some indistinguishable blob? Leave Uncanny with the X-Titles, Amazing with Spider-Man, Incredible with the Hulk, Invincible with Iron Man, etc. It just confuses things when you start swapping them all around from a marketing perspective.
Part of that, though, ties into the behind-the-scenes stuff going on and how it was, intentionally or no, harming the X-books (aka The CompleX). I mean, do you see them making an X-Men book called "Earth's Mightiest Heroes," Secret X-Men, Fantastic X-Men and the like?
If the franchise needs a secondary or tertiary adjective, Astonishing works and, honestly, so does Extraordinary.
What can I say but, "I love comics."
When did they first go to more than one Xmen book a month, and what was it called?