If ten years of recording The Young and the Restless for my mother have taught me anything, it's that characters in serial dramas are always happily in love...until they're not
“The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views...which can be very uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.” - the 4th Doctor
Regarding the breaking sword, I kind of link the origin of WW's sword to Kingdom Come. At the very least, I tend to think that that particular story popularized the sword. In any event, I'm pretty sure the sword ended up breaking in the sequel, so I don't attribute unbreakability to the sword. Sure, it can shave an electron off an atom, but it's not unbreakable like her bracers.
Looking back at the original DoS story in the comics, I sometimes wonder if the reason the Justice League Junior Varsity team was featured was because the entire point of the showdown was that Doomsday beat everyone else who was thrown in front of him, and the only thing that was going to stop him from ripping up Metropolis was a Superman who didn't hold back anything in his punches, nut Superman was going to die in the process. You don't have to address the question about how the combined might of the real heavy hitters would fare against the beast (though later stories did). If you substitute in the "real" JL, something's gotta give. You either change the basic framework of the story, or the rest of the team have to go down. I guess the one mitigating factor is that while Superman did kill Doomsday (sort of, since DD can't really die), he had to die. The other JL teammates "only" go KO'd but lived.
There's almost no middle ground here. It's pretty hard to make a story where the entire team engages Doomsday, WW (or whoever) gets to stand as tall as Superman, Superman kills the beast, and Superman dies in the process. BvS tried, but that came short. At the very least, a Double KO is easier to write for. Anything else, and it'd likely seem like Superman had to die needlessly.
Which brings me back to my original point: avoid DoS retellings. If not for the redundancy, then at least nobody has to tank a fight to tell a story.
Pretty much this.
If you have the full power A team League mashed by Doomsday and then Superman beats him one on one, you are unavoidably saying that Superman is tougher than every other member put together.
At which point everyone else becomes Superman's sidekick [instead of Batman's, but that's another discussion ]
If ten years of recording The Young and the Restless for my mother have taught me anything, it's that characters in serial dramas are always happily in love...until they're not
“The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views...which can be very uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.” - the 4th Doctor
I think WW did well during her fight with Doomsday she last longer than her teammates, if WW did beat Doomsday then whats the point of having Superman if she beat him, this film focuses on Superman so he will be the one to defeat Doomsday, It seems like that if Wonder Woman struggle, lose a fight, or show some incompetence, then some fans would get upset and act like DC has it out for her. I am fine with the way the movie execute it, she lasted long and did some couple of damages on Doomsday.
I don't think it's so much about WW beating Doomsday or anything like that. It's more about WW being sidelined and butchered in almost everything where Superman (and Batman) are involved. We don't really have moments where WW is the one to save the day in a big event. She's just sidelined and I think it ticks people off.
This is DoS, it wouldn't matter how formidable all the JLers are written, Doomsday will always be Superman's kill, resulting in his own death. That is the story. Fundamentally, it can't be changed regardless of what fans want. I thought WW did well under the circumstances, she did last longer.
I'm trying to understand the complaints in this thread. I have never read WW so I am largely ignorant of her history. Are people mad because she hasn't been shown as being equally strong although DC claims she is (basically they're all talk and no show)?
Last edited by rpmaluki; 08-02-2018 at 11:25 AM.
Personally, I think it would've been best if WW never showed up in this movie. I mean, it's a Superman film so of course everyone not named Superman is going to be sidelined and that's exactly what happened. As for DC's claims on WW...yes, it has been all talk and no show for years now. They keep claiming she's the best fighter, she's so smart and all of that but they never really show it. It's all lip service. Didn't Geoff Johns say she was the best fighter in the DCEU? Umm...where is that? We haven't gotten anything to claim that she is besides empty words.
All this talk about the B-League and a blind Gyu Gardner lasts way longer than Hal did.
Anyhow, it`s "Death of Superman". The premise alone dictates how it`s going to go.
“Better fighting skills” “best fighter”...
Lol what does that even mean? If it’s between a black belt level fighter and a meteor, the meteor will win EVERY time.
If ten years of recording The Young and the Restless for my mother have taught me anything, it's that characters in serial dramas are always happily in love...until they're not
“The very powerful and the very stupid have one thing in common. Instead of altering their views to fit the facts, they alter the facts to fit their views...which can be very uncomfortable if you happen to be one of the facts that needs altering.” - the 4th Doctor
Not even close.
Remember when Wonder Woman got punked by Kalibak and then Superman said in so many words that he wasn't even worthy of fighting Batman!
I guess the Justice League DCEU movie makes sense now when he says to Wondy and Aquaman, "Is this guy still bothering you"?