I mean, sure, if you're happy just phoning it in.
I'm gonna be the second positive response to Donna's Dark Angel phase that Siege has seen. The problem with Donna is that you're in too deep already; her continuity is beyond broken and she's got too many ties to major IP's; changing her history creates a canon ripple effect across a big chunk of the DCU. Any attempt to resolve her origin will result in some part of her history not making sense internally, and/or rubbing up wrong against Diana's continuity, or the Titans (which spreads to Metropolis and Gotham and Central and.....). Try to fix the origin again and you're just throwing good money after bad.
Byrne made all the reboots work for the character by internalizing these different continuities; the breaks in her canon isn't "bad writing," it was an attack on a multi-dimensional level. Donna is the victim of non-consensual rebooting. Whatever her history and dynamics were at any given time? That's exactly how Donna experienced it, regardless of what the official modern continuity is.
The whole Dark Angel thing is clever; it gives Donna a rogue of her own (how deep is Donna's rogues gallery? Two people?) with a cosmic scope but very personal motivations. It makes Donna's broken history work for her; instead of trying to paint over a broken wall Byrne just installed a window. And most importantly, it gave Donna a major role and niche in the DCU; a narrative purpose she has never had before or since. "Donna Troy, Harbinger of the Multiverse" wasn't just a character with ensemble appeal, that was a character you could hang a solo on. Defending continuity, hunted by a foe who had literally rewritten Donna's reality several times, dealing with cosmic titans and expanding on the Monitor lore.....when has Donna ever had that much going for her?
It could have been her "Nightwing" moment. But alas.