Which is why he's worse than Rian. "I'm going to half-ass this and let others pick up the slack" is no way to handle a franchise.
Nor is this.No, he didn't. Everything TFA set up was followed up on in TLJ, it was simply followed up on in a manner that didn't match the common expectation. Instead of Snoke being the big bad, he gets ganked so that someone else can take the spot.
Both of which were better ideas than the common expectation.
As Snoke was initially presented as someone who was careful, only revealing himself to his direct subordinates via hologram, but then all of a sudden decided to sit opulently in a large red room to pontificate. There are ways his death could've been handled that would've produced the same powershift, that wouldn't have involved making a parody of his character.. Now I'll admit, the more I think about this, this could- and probably should- be chalked up to JJ Abrams and his lack of consideration for the fact that he wouldn't be leading for the second film in the new trilogy. So I'd be perfectly fine saying this isn't Rian's fault. I can't shift that blame for Hux however, he had considerably more screen time and had more of an established character going into TLJ. To have him turned into the 'comic relief baddy' wasn't anything you could say was 'good subversion'.
This however? Was great and is proof Rian could have done a better job elsewhere.Instead of Rey having a special backstory, she was the child of no one important.
Not things I had issues with. Finn was a great support character for Rey, initially. Had his own compelling enough backstory, (child soldier that shook off his programming and is doing his best to either atone or prevent this from happening in future), and worked well with Rey's scrappy yet ultimately altruistic, survivor characterization (until Abrams decided to crap all this dynamic in RoS). My issues with Luke's characterization is a bit less 'subversion was bad, and the way it was subverted was detrimental'. Luke falling is fine, probably even to be expected considering he's still human. How he fell? It could have been handled far, FAR better than what we were given, and all it would've taken was him simply dropping the Lightsaber at his feet (and not throwing it comically, and dismissively away)… which would've managed the same effect... and him not milking a Giraffe-Walrus thing and drinking the warm, blue milk like some kind of Wildman.A lot of the things TLJ gets criticized for (Such as Luke's deal at the start, or Finn not getting Jedi training) were things that are just Rian following off from where TFA left him.
Two simple changes, and now the solid foundation you had to work with is absolutely unshakeable:
Luke, the formerly almost-painfully optimistic savior of the Galaxy, who had wagered his life and the galaxy on his trust in his friends and the goodness he hoped was still left in his father. Who had taken great lengths to honor Obi-Wan's legacy and rebuild the Jedi Order only to abandon it after a moment of weakness that saw it all burned to ash... and Rey, a woman who had despite lacking in all of the things Luke had going for him, stepped up without being asked. Who had gone through hell and highwater to find him to try and bring him back so that he could do what he'd done before and save the Galaxy... only to realize that the legend she'd grown up hearing about was just a broken shell unfit to give her the help and training she needed; and she'd have to be the one to do what he refused to?
Fantastic juxtaposition, and a way for Rey to grow and thrive in a way that both challenges the viewers' and gives weight to what happens next.
Now, we got notes of this, in a rather rushed and slapdash manner (and a weird chortle of a pep-talk from Ghost Yoda) sure... but the end result felt hollow, and wasn't in any way helped by the "cranky grandpa who likes the blue milk a bit too much". The above two changes, while slight, also would've made his redemption at the end of the movie feel deserved. The Luke we meet at the beginning in TLJ, didn't really deserve a heroic sacrifice. He needed to be put in a home for the elderly.
A third, and perhaps lesser thing: Improving Luke's characterization would've also helped Rey, as the main character in any story suffers when the supporting characters are crap.
The issue is not with 'established lore' in the sense that I want established lore to be preserved at all costs. Star Wars lore is something that has been retconned quite a bit, to say its lore, or lore in established settings in general should never be changed is not something I believe, in general. The issue I have with THIS particular lore break however, is the problems it causes for the story as a direct result of the action. Why?As for the Lightspeed Ram scene: It was amazing, visually stunning scene, and only toxic fanboys care that it "breaks established lore" or whatever.
If you can take a ship and fly it at lightspeed into another ship, and utterly obliterate a fleet of ships surrounding it in the process; it breaks the lore in a way that causes direct plot issues because 1) it means this is something people are aware is possible 2) raises the question of why they haven't been doing it literally forever... as literally all you'd need to do, to win any space battle EVER, is take a ship and Kamikaze it into another ship.[/B] That not only cheapens the stakes of anything going forward, but is just objectively stupid.
To address my comments about Holdo being stupid (because I feel like this might be part of the problem and my fault for typing fast and loose...) it's in response to how she handled the events leading up to the Hyperspace Kamikaze. Keeping everyone in the dark to the point where one person (Poe) attempts to stage a munity due to thinking Holdo herself is a First Order Spy is stupid. After all, if the mutiny had been successful? They all die. The single thing Holdo is attempting to prevent. The demand, implicit or explicit in this scenario, to simply 'shut up and follow orders' is also not a good thing. If the goal was to maximize the saving of lives, while mitigating the losses; it could have been written in a way that managed that without making Holdo look stupid.
Writing a character, any character, like that is not a good thing. Especially if the character is on the side fighting against 'shut up and follow orders'.
As for this?Darth Vader being Luke's father broke Established Lore to a much greater extent, and that wasn't a problem.
It wasn't established that Vader wasn't his father? All Old Ben said was that 'Vader killed Anakin', which in a metaphysical sense is true. Anakin's personality was subsumed by the Vader persona when he fell to the dark side. Ignoring the complicated discussion about what is the 'self' however, this wasn't a lore-break in the same way the Hyperspace Kamikaze is (considering it would also raise broader questions and cause problems with the rest of the sagas); it was more of a subversion. Almost blow-for-blow the same as the subversion of expectation with Rey's parentage. Nobody thought Vader was Luke's father. When it was revealed he was, people lost their minds. Everyone thought Rey was going to be the daughter of someone like Luke, Leia/Han Solo. When Rian revealed that she wasn't, people lost their minds.
Good subversion of expectation =/= Breaking the Lore in a way that causes more problems than it solves.