'66 was also good. '89 and Returns were not.
I haven't forgotten anything. Of the four films, there is only one that completely soaked in the old television show vibe. The other three are just not on the same level (even Batman Forever), IMO. The Burton films are more weird than campy to me, FWIW, but to each is own.
A bat! That's it! It's an omen.. I'll shall become a bat!
Pre-CBR Reboot Join Date: 10-17-2010
Pre-CBR Reboot Posts: 4,362
THE CBR COMMUNITY STANDARDS & RULES ~ So... what's your excuse now?
A bat! That's it! It's an omen.. I'll shall become a bat!
Pre-CBR Reboot Join Date: 10-17-2010
Pre-CBR Reboot Posts: 4,362
THE CBR COMMUNITY STANDARDS & RULES ~ So... what's your excuse now?
It's definitely THE most campy, no argument there. But some (not you) act like Robin brought the camp into the "serious" early film series, but it was never 100% serious to begin with.
Campy mixes with weird often enough. And Returns is the one that is borrowing actual plots from the 60s show (Penguin taking over the Batmobile, running for mayor) and the visual of the Penguin in his giant rubber ducky boat goes beyond merely goth/weird into full blow ridiculous. In the best way possible, IMO, but still.
There is also Christopher Walken as a vampiric businessman in a ludicrous wig. Nobody is going to not laugh at that, and that's an element of self aware fun the modern Batman movies haven't really displayed.
They were immersed in typical Burton weirdness (which Gotham emulated), but they weren't funny films. Unlike Adam West, Keaton and Kilmer played it seriously. Clooney tried to straddle the line, but to no avail. Yes, they were comedic moments, but no Bat shark repellant or Batman telling Robin to put on his safety belt.
A bat! That's it! It's an omen.. I'll shall become a bat!
Pre-CBR Reboot Join Date: 10-17-2010
Pre-CBR Reboot Posts: 4,362
THE CBR COMMUNITY STANDARDS & RULES ~ So... what's your excuse now?
Typical Burton weirdness is still camp though, at least in my opinion, just his own flavor of camp. West was campy, but he was still the relative straight man compared to everyone else, and that's no different than Keaton playing it straight opposite DeVito and Pfeiffer hamming it up.
Yeah, there's no Bat Shark repellent but again...big rubber ducky boat, rocket launching penguins and a big spooky circus train traveling through an empty (?) city to kidnap kids. It's campy, the big difference is that it's not lit up by neon. The entire series was campy, just to varying degrees and it seemed to increase with each subsequent installment. People overlook how silly Returns can be because it also has some darker, twisted stuff in it (often presented in a black comedy way), and it's going to be upstaged in the camp department if the next one has Jim Carrey in it.
there's a reason the suits at WB have no love for Robin. Hell even over at Marvel they had to age up Bucky to even have him in the MCU and that's about as close a comparison as you can get to the less dark Marvel movies
A kid with no powers running around beating up adults is camp and pretty unrealistic WB is almost hardline when it comes to no presenting Batman in a non campy manner after the Nolan movies. Hell after Joker's success I bet you'll be hard pressed to ever see a lighthearted live action version of Batman anything
Maybe if in the last 20 years we had only got Batman brave and the bold instead of BTAS things would be different
BTAS had Robin in the 18-21 range, and it worked fine. TNBA went onto to have a tiny 12 year old Tim Drake as Robin.
A college aged Robin wouldn't be as difficult to pull off as people make it out to be, especially as they would most likely cast an actor in their mid-late 20s who can pass as a little younger anyway.
Disagree - maybe there won't be anything lighthearted Batman related in the live action department, but we'll still get lighthearted animation. I mean there's the pre-school targeted Batwheels coming up.
But yeah, I can't see them using a Robin younger than 16 in any live action adaptation.