No, there's not - comparing a mythological ancient figure to real world bigots and recent sexual predator is just...yeah, no.
Seriously, holy **** man, Epstein???
I'm sorry, but I just don't agree. The narrative of Wonder Woman is shaped not by her birth but by her childhood. The live action film proved that - nothing was lost, Wonder Woman wasn't changed because of that detail. We saw her in Themyscira as a child, we saw her training, we saw the women in her life. We saw what made her who she was. And suddenly that was thrown away at the end of the film when we discovered Zeus was the sperm donor? I just can't buy that. I saw the film, and that change didn't harm Wonder Woman.
Now 84 on the other hand...
What Joker did with Thomas Wayne is fine, and what Man of Steel did with Johnathan Kent is fine. Just like Zeus, it caused no damage to their heroes. The Trinity's parentage isn't the important aspect of their characters - even if Thomas was a dick, it doesn't change Bruce's grief and rage seeing his parents killed. If Johnathan is morally debating whether his child should save a bus full of children vs keeping Clark safe doesn't change who Superman becomes, and Wonder Woman discovering that no she wasn't made out of magic clay she has a father like everyone else on earth doesn't change the fact she was raised, shaped, and molded by strong women in her life. Origin stories are important, but fans today are too attached to the small details over the important character beats that form who these heroes are.Agreed, though to be fair look what Joker did to Thomas Wayne. Even with the Zeus origin, Hippolyta probably fared the best of of the Trinity parents recently in film
True. But there's literally nothing to suggest they're doing anything other than race bending Clark. They're not blind, they know what's going on in the rumor mill/blogosphere/online. They could say "it's not Clark" - unless of course, they can't because it is.