That panel was mocking the people who say stuff like “WW is a warrior of course she kills her enemies!” which isn’t at all how WW is supposed to be. I doubt Morrison has read Injustice, he was moreso taking shots at himself, Johns, Bendis, and other “big” writers.
He said that he was roasting himself as well as others, so he’s not being hypocritical about it. He knows he bears some of the responsibility for that characterization.
When is a sword and shield “needed” exactly? Swords are used for one thing: Killing. The Lasso lets her nonlethally take down people and foes. Her bracelets are what she uses to deflect bullets or blows. She doesn’t need either of those weapons.
Can we not hash out the sword no sword debate here? There's a place for it in the WW subforum.
(But if you must know I'm pro-sword - just cause all the "Oh noes, she has a sword!" stuff has made me root for it)
E também ñao sentimos que o escudo era necessário -- And also we didn't feel that the shield was necessary.
My Portuguese lessons finally pay off.
https://twitter.com/Borys_Kit/status...57830164971521
The Flash has been given the release date of 07/01/2022.
[ deleted ]
Last edited by jennysparks; 12-11-2019 at 02:37 PM.
WW hasn't had a no killing rule since the first DC reboot so a sword fits just fine in situations where she won't be able to non-lethally subdue someone. And because I know how these conversations tend to go, no, I don't want Diana killing all the time but the option doesn't have to be off the table.