Sounds to me like it should be regular thing. If you follow some reviewer and eventually you notice that you disagree with his views/tastes/whatever then you should stop subscribing to him, no?
Sounds to me like it should be regular thing. If you follow some reviewer and eventually you notice that you disagree with his views/tastes/whatever then you should stop subscribing to him, no?
Lmao
0CEA64A0-A2D6-412C-AC1E-6B901995F26B.jpg
If Emmerich or Hamanda really were stupid enough to think they could just put out the SC and have that be the end of it, let this disprove that notion. And since they gave them the SC they will never ever know peace now. The discourse around DC movies will remain permanently toxic from here on out.
It doesn’t matter at this point; the narrative has already been quietly changed to “even if the film is bad; it’s still 100% Berg/Johns’ fault”
I gotta wonder if the Ray Fisher situation didn't play a big role in why WB's already dismissed future Snyderverse follow ups, before even seeing how it does on HBO Max. WB decided to give the snyder cult a bone, thinking they would get some good will. Only to have it emboldened Fisher to settle some scores and they got a PR mess. I'd cut that franchise loose too if I was in their position.
Depends-is it everything he or she says or is it certain topics?
I dumped one recently.
On the grounds he could not hide his HATRED of Marvel, Ms Marvel, Ryan Coogler, WOMEN in comics, Sana Amanat and calling certain folks in comics racists (with no evidence). He can't promote his stuff or do a review without insulting Marvel.
Before PANDERING to a certain gator fandom-he was fine. He could give you thought reviews and commentary with DATA to back it up. I miss those days.
Let this be an example of PANDERING GONE WRONG.If Emmerich or Hamanda really were stupid enough to think they could just put out the SC and have that be the end of it, let this disprove that notion. And since they gave them the SC they will never ever know peace now. The discourse around DC movies will remain permanently toxic from here on out.
They WILLINGLY gave in.
I mean if they wanted to show that version WITHOUT doing anything and let Snyder comment on it or just show it as is-I think that would have been fine.
The MOMENT you gave him MONEY to finish his version-Dc asked for it.
Now the question will be HOW TOXIC will it get?
Will they go after say the folks doing Static's movie? What about Star Girl's show? Or Doom Patrol's Cyborg?
Sounds more like people wanting to see something continue, than anything 'toxic'. I think JL is going to do really well in March.
I just really want more Ben Affleck BATMAN- and why the hell not? There's no need for an either/or mentality. SHAZAM is the best superhero flick IMO, but I also love the Ultimate Cut of BvS (which feels in the vein of X-Men: Days of Future Past which slaps). We can accommodate all kinds of tones and vibes.
Last edited by Flash Gordon; 12-31-2020 at 05:21 PM.
They’re toxic. They’ve shown that again and again by constantly harassing anyone who even dares to say they don’t like Zack Snyder’s films. Doubt you’ll get what you want, Affleck has already booked a bunch of films apparently, his cameo in Flashpoint may be how he gracefully bows out.
Eh, I'm not on Twitter or anything so I'll take your word for it but whatever they're doing seems to work. I don't want to use the word 'toxic' lightly. This seems light to me.
I doubt very much that Affleck is bowing out (the very concept of bowing out sounds hacky), but we'll see. I don't think he wants to be Batman in anything other than stuff he makes or Zach Snyder makes- so it'll depend on that. They're all nuts if they don't let Affleck direct his own feature.
Last edited by Flash Gordon; 12-31-2020 at 06:04 PM.