First off I never said Dick had or should be written like he was in NW #29 for this story. I said that it felt like a bible for how he should act. Two very different things, the main point of that post was to steer discussion towards a Dick Grayson bible. You know what a character bible is? In short it's how the character acts, almost like a template. So any writer coming in can read it and have a very basic level of understanding of the character depending on the detail of said bible. Every writer or company has one and I'm curious what Dick's looks like, how it's changed over the years, or if he currently even has one right now. The creative team going into this arc doesn't feel like they know who he is. Knowing who the character is let's you know who he isn't. From there you can build a solid foundation of how Dick is different pre and post-headshot. Let's say you are doing a story about an amnesiac Superman, how do you go about it? What is the goal of the story? Is it just about him retaining those superhuman feats and continuing his life or does he become someone else entirely? If he does than what are you trying to do or say with the story? The main real difference between Dick and Ric (other than general outlook, design, thoughts on being a hero, etc) is that Ric does his heroing reduncantlantly or as almost a survival instinct. Is this story saying that Dick would've always been a heroic person if the situation was fight or flight or that without Bruce's training Dick would just be a normal guy not stepping into help?
This story feels more like Scott Lobdell transplanting himself in Ric's place. Enjoying the discovery of him becoming a superhero and commenting about how cool and awesome the life is while also complaining about it as if those complaints were actual development or depth. We are 4 issues into this story and the only meaningful things that happened was Scarecrow escaping Arkham (like always), Dick being a homeless criminal, and some cops finding his old hideout. There is very little reflection or introspection, no deep character work, no meaning about Nightwing's importance to Bludhaven other than some cops putting on old outfits. It's just a fill-in arc that was hyped to be something more than it really is. Deconstructionist stories like these I think have been so overdone in the modern age of comics, writers and readers seem more interested in how characters should act in relation to today's world or break a character down to their essentials and display what they think that means in relation to the world. These stories are so played out, they peaked with Watchmen and DKR back in the 80s. Batman just had the same amnesiac, who am I, what do I represent blah blah blah arc, Aquaman is going through the same thing, they did it poorly with Donna when they brought her back, it is so tiring. We keep going through the same cycle of stories, most are worse than the version before it.