He'll never give answers as the hours I spent questioning him, he danced around answers by throwing more back at me. He seems to get entertainment out of teasing fans, even after all this time when there's no way Marvel is going to let him resolve his plots. When I went to the extent of flagging even this he bit back that the plots could end up being instead addressed in his own written fiction. But he hasn't had a novel published in over twenty years and only one short story in that whole time. Every novel he has written since has not met with interest from publishers. So he just needs to give up and respect his fans by finally providing answers to all of his unresolved plots.
Nor I! Friend David Rettenmaier has been keeping me up to date as he has been posting regularly up until this point.
He’s seemed shitty so I would expect it would be the other, that his pitches have been knocked back. He even went on to draft a huge pitch this year on the Reavers and Gateway which was knocked back because he obviously hadn’t realised Gateway had been killed off (being an Australian, I always considered Walkabout would have been a better codename than Gateway).
That’s high praise, indeed. Thank you.
The term in his script was sidereal string, which he had likewise used in Excalibur (when referring to Widget), so yes I would expect so.
I'm glad you think so as you’re one of the only fans who has agreed with me when I’ve pointed this out.
Did you know Chris also revealed who the Bright Lady was, but back in the seventies?
I wonder if he intended to introduce such a character in Uncanny X-Men #282, but what we instead got was Bishop? Claremont would have likely gone for introducing a new female character over a male and he was apparently involved in early discussions for the introduction of the character that became Bishop.
The question then becomes how he got transported back in time from our current era to the era leading up to Scott’s youth as he seemed to have entrenched himself at the State Home for Foundlings for some time.
Chris was no longer a Creative Director working for Bob Harras by the time of the latter fight, so I’m not sure we can count that.
Yes I remember and it completely threw what he had previously established. It does not make sense for Logan to have his adamantium by 1936.
There is no evidence that Landau, Luckman and Lake were intended in Claremont’s original conception to be involved in time travel. That idea only got interwoven later by Larry Hama. In Claremont’s initial conception, LL&L seemed more traders with interdimensional cultures as opposed to temporal ones. Remember Psylocke’s armour and it being introduced in the same story Claremont introduced Roughhouse. The armour seemed mystical so suggested LL&L were trading with the Nine Realms.
Good points all. If Logan was working for LL&L, that would suggest Raven and Irene Adler were also. Yet if they were working for a Temporal Bureau, how did they get manipulated by the Shadow King for so many decades?
As for how he knew where to find Kitty and Kinross, that could be explained by Irene's usual precognitive visions guiding the mission.
I know. None of it makes sense. I suspect these anomalies are why it was initially rejected for publication in 1990-91 when Claremont originally pitched it for Excalibur Special Edition #3 and #4.
The biggest problem with the story is how Baron Strucker ends up with his long-time facial scar as a result of Logan's claws, yet didn’t recognise him 6 years later in Madripoor. That’s not possible, period.
FYI, in Back Issue #4, Chris revealed that it was Wolverine's whispering in Charles' ear to seek out Kitty in Deerfield in X-Men #129. Hence she became part of the team because Wolverine set it up. Was Logan's advice a result of the mission we saw in X-Men: True Friends, and had Irene Adler told him of her later significance to human-mutant relations and this is why he pushed Charles to recruit her? If so, how did Logan keep track of the Pryde's from there given her parents would only have migrated to the US after WWII and he was by that point travelling back and forth from Canada to Japan, Russia, etc.?
Hopefully its use in the film Wolverine: Origins will make Feige want to avoid it like the plague.
Was the introduction of Seraph in Marvel Comics Presents #2, then Psylocke's mystical armour in Wolverine #5 was taking us in that direction. If Sabretooth was a modern day pirate, what was he really pirating? Perhaps it’s all connected!?
And just where did the armour end up after Betsy passed through the Siege Perilous?
Although if it was that mystical, how did the Adversary manage to re-corporate after Wolverine slashed him with his adamantium claws yet struggle to maintain his Naze form after Colossus punched him?
Yes it might enable him to kill anyone, but if he could bend I-Beams before, I’m not convinced he would consider it as providing him with a necessary edge, particularly if it led to the slowing down of his healing factor. If he was able to whup Logan's arse annually, even when Wolvie had the adamantium, nothing much would likely be capable of stopping him without it.
If it was decapitation he was worried about, had Sabretooth been through that before and if so who the heck managed to pull that off?
Hama’s plot had the exact opposite happen to Logan when he went feral as hell after having his adamantium removed.
As for classic Marvel villains capable of being involved in the bonding of adamantium to Logan's skeleton, the most logical would seem to be Magneto given he could have made the procedure as quick, painless, and untraceable as possible.
By beating him up every year? Given Sabretooth routed Logan again in Wolverine #10, it didn’t seem to be working sufficiently.
Absolutely! So the jury is still frustratingly out.