Originally Posted by
godisawesome
I tend to think that true “preachiness” in art can only really come with hypocrisy - which is of course going to be much rarer when dealing with true representation behind the camera.
On the other hand, if context, subtext, or just plain text reveals a hypocrisy, than it can feel preachy because it doesn’t seem to practice what it’s ostensibly about. Like how The Force Awakens practiced inclusion well enough to establish a context where Lucasfilm’s subtextual bias and prejudice towards Adam Driver as Kylo Ren was revealed by The Last Jedi, even though The Last Jedi’s most vocal defenders try to argue it was making a statement.
Because we saw that Star Wars was perfectly capable of having a female main character and a black male lead, we saw that her story didn’t neccessarily need a connection to a pre-established “patriarchy,” and we saw that having a close relationship with pseudo-romantic vibes between a black guy and a white girl wasn’t driving off anyone… before The Last Jedi came in an immediately started pimping out Rey’s credibility to try and push Kylo as the male lead and de-facto main protagonist because of his family while seeming to freak out about Finn so much it banished him and the rest of the cast’s non-white actors to a subplot of a subplot of pointless failure.
There, when people claimed TLJ was progressive, it stunk of hypocrisy. The film couldn’t “go woke, get broke” because it wasn’t “woke” in the first place.
(Don’t get me wrong; Luke’s fans got pissed or very predictable reasons, and the family story arguably needed Rey to be a Skywalker… but those are different aspects of TLJ’s issues.)